TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Reason, Fruity or some other....
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Joi Lamusic on Sep-05-2002 18:50:

Invisible Grin Reason, Fruity or some other....

I know Reason and Fruity (have them both). But what else little studios there are out for pc? Any ideas?


Posted by phasedout on Sep-05-2002 19:55:

Theres Orion but i dont know much about it.


Posted by Joi Lamusic on Sep-05-2002 20:58:

Yeah, now there is new orion Platinum... ANyone have any comments of it?


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Sep-05-2002 21:12:

Storm
Buzz
Cubase
ReBirth


Posted by Joi Lamusic on Sep-08-2002 06:44:

Cubase... Is it something like Reason/Fruity (like little soft-studio)??

And is it really any good?


Posted by Treo on Sep-08-2002 09:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Joi Lamusic
Cubase... Is it something like Reason/Fruity (like little soft-studio)??

And is it really any good?


Cubase is a sequencer. only. But it's a damn powerful one, probably only logic platinum can compete with it. You need lots of vst plugins or hardware to make the actual sounds, but if you get it right it sounds like no other. It's a professional tool..


Posted by Tom_cowan on Sep-09-2002 12:28:

Reason running along side Cubase via Rewire on a high spec machine, it doesnt get much more powerful as far as computer music production goes. Its also fukin wicked!


Posted by Joi Lamusic on Sep-09-2002 20:28:

Yeah, I already have Reason (and I love it). but I think I will get Cubase (or some other that acn be rewired with Reason and can ahndle those VST-plugins). And maybe I also will get Rebirth... Little birds told me that Rebirth is really good for 303-sound


Posted by Metronome on Sep-13-2002 04:11:

www.buzzmachines.com I'll never get tired of saying Buzz rulez! D'l it. If you are up for something really hard but amazingly rewarding on software, use that. James Holden backs up my word. I'm serious.


Posted by quddha on Sep-13-2002 17:43:

buzz is cool, and its free. Good thing i have a backgruond in tracking, otherwise it'd be very frustrating to learn. Still buggy though, cuz the guy lost the code. I hope they update the prog, cuz I think its great.

You can load buzz machines into fruity, which I'm fooling around with right now. FSM infector is an awesome synth.


Posted by Joi Lamusic on Sep-14-2002 14:16:

So buzz is VST or something if it can be used with Fruity?


Posted by Michael Russo on Sep-14-2002 14:22:

No, buzz is a program for making music. I wouldn't recommend it if you're using reason. Buzz does sound better than reason in many regards, and you can do a lot more with it, but sequencing with it is a nightmare if you have no tracker experience.

But, you can use buzz machines (the synths, and effects too i think) within fruity... although not all work and you lose a lot of the freedom buzz gives you.


Posted by Joi Lamusic on Sep-15-2002 08:33:

I downloded the Buzz.. I can open those demo tracks and they sound ok. But I just can't get the basics of that machine...

How I can use those some buzz synths/sounds with Fruity?


Posted by Joi Lamusic on Sep-15-2002 08:34:

Umh... How can I see those notes that are playing in those demosongs?


Posted by quddha on Sep-15-2002 19:40:

meh, its really difficult to explain if you don't have tracking experience. :P The help files are best to get u started.

I love buzz and the flexibility it offers, its just way too unstable, and the sequencing interface is really bad right now. To load buzz machines, go into fruity, and add a 'buzz generator adapter' channel, and load a buzz machine .dll file into that channel.


Posted by Zombie0915 on Sep-29-2002 18:47:

can buzz effects be loaded into fruity too?


Posted by quddha on Sep-29-2002 22:43:

yep, just use the buzz effect adapter. but i dunno, after fooling around with it, the machines and effects don't have the same sound as when used with buzz... I'm a tracker and heart too, just hoping a buzz 2 comes out.


Posted by fluoxetine on Oct-02-2002 00:12:

You mean to tell me James Holden uses Buzz in to make his music? He is one of the coolest producers out there imo...man i'm definetely going to have to check it out.


Posted by Tweak on Nov-27-2002 01:56:

Yeah, I read in a Sasha interview that James Holden uses Buzz pretty much exclusively. Anyone else here played with this cool proggie? It would be good to get a tips thread started for it....


Posted by quddha on Nov-27-2002 04:48:

Yeah, i've tried everything, but I always come back to buzz. All info is on buzzmachines.com

Someone uploaded (in the reviews section) a nice emulation of 4strings - into the night using only buzz machines. Sounds just like the original. hehe

Concept is simple, generators hook up to effects, hook up to master, in any combination you can think of. Patterns are made, using a tracker like editor (ticks), and arranged in a multi pattern sequencer. Patterns can be made for generators or effects, and any slider or paramater can be automated in the pattern.

The program itself hasn't been developed for quite a while, but buzz2 is still under development. So there are quite a few bugs that you might need to iron out. The great part is that there are SO many machines u can use, and of course, you can load up your favorite vsti and vst effects. (like the fm7).


Posted by xls on Nov-28-2002 19:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Treo
Cubase is a sequencer. only.

This is not true any more, and hasn't been for a long time. Cubase is an entire production suite. It started off as sequencer/notation software (back in the days of Atari). The most recent version (Cubase SX) is a sequencer, notator, hard-disk recorder, and mastering suite all in one. It integrates MIDI, VST, Rewire (Rebirth and Reason), and Audio tracks all into one great mixer interface. It does come with a couple of free VST synths, but they're not that great. Where Cubase shines is it's MIDI implementation and VST support...


Posted by Michael Russo on Nov-29-2002 12:50:

One word: BuzzVST


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Dec-06-2002 16:09:

Anyone use Acid Pro 3.0? How's that in comparison to other programs, like Fruity Loops? I've got both, but I've only played around a little bit with Acid Pro.


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Dec-06-2002 16:11:

quote:
I've got both, but I've only played around a little bit with Acid Pro.


Oops. I meant I've messed around a little bit with Fruity Loops.


Posted by Fatboy on Dec-06-2002 18:34:

I have tested Acid. IMO it's not suited for producing AT ALL, but I've heard somebody actually manages to churn out good shit from it. Guess it shows that it's the man/woman and not the tools that makes the music. I would rather go with Fruity if those two are the only alternatives. If not, you should browse threads here and see what program you think would suit you the most. There are so many alternatives out there..

Peace


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.