TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- Simply braindead.
Simply braindead.
Ugh, after 3 weeks of partying, drinking, puffing and generally doing jackshit, school's on Monday. I'm havin a go at some homework due back first day, but god damn.. i just cant concentrate!!! Hahahah. All i'll say is, good luck to those going back to school/uni this week, or in the next little while 
yeah big good luck goin out to the aussie ta's doing their HSC or TEE or whatever!
OMG, this just reminded me that I have a 2,500 word essay due in on Tuesday!!! If anybody knows anything about the ethics of whistle-blowing please help me!
P.S. Good luck to all of those Year 12 TAs out there.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Dowlz ...the ethics of whistle-blowing please help me! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PointyDC You must be shitting me no?... if not, good luck bro!! heheheh |
Here's a slightly reworded intro; runs a little better (hopefully)...
This essay will examine the ethical issues faced by workers just like Dan Applegate -� employees who are placed in a position whereby illegal or unethical company activity becomes known to them. Firstly the definition of whistle blowing will be examined...
What uni are you at, DJ Dowlz? If your library has access to the ProQuest or LexisNexis electronic databases, use those. They're a goldmine of journal and newspaper articles.
I'm a 4th year management student, so I know a little bit about this sorta thing
I did fairly well in ethics, so PM me for any help.
2500? On Tuesday? Pfft.
Try writing a 3000 word company law essay the night before its due, then finishing it off on the day its due. Now that takes talent.
Thanx SQ-K for the changes! I've actually got quite a number of photocopied chapters from ethics books, so research ain't a problem. But thanks for the advice about ProQuest etc. It's a pity I'm not actually in Adelaide atm so I can't access the library. But oh well. Professional Ethics is only an elective subject for me (I'm studying 2nd year med).
muahaha
i crammed a semester's worth of research into a 3,000 word feature article - all in the one night 
started my research about 9pm the night before it was due...
and speaking of braindead....tequila shots rule urrgh
too much alkeyhole 
fark you eh!
wheres my tequila.... 
Dolwz, you could include something about the Spaceshuttle that blew up as well. It kind of relates, except the whistle blower was supressed until, cabam, bye bye space shuttle.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by hey cheggy Dolwz, you could include something about the Spaceshuttle that blew up as well. It kind of relates, except the whistle blower was supressed until, cabam, bye bye space shuttle. |
Slight technical problem?
*raised eyebrow*
I thought they would've called it an "incident" as opposed to an "accident" .. oh wait it's nasa not qantas 
although after the "incident" - NASA now stands for Need Another Seven Astronauts
| quote: |
| Originally posted by webmeister Slight technical problem? *raised eyebrow* I thought they would've called it an "incident" as opposed to an "accident" .. oh wait it's nasa not qantas ![]() although after the "incident" - NASA now stands for Need Another Seven Astronauts |
Oh shit, i just remembered that the Final HSC exams are coming up in 3 weeks for us year 12s...
OH NOOOO, i haven't studied yet...I forgot the concept of studying...please help..
Gotta hit the shitty books *yawn.
studying for ur hsc is a piece of piss,
i studied for all 6 of my hsc exams in 5 days, and look how i turned out....
ok so not very well, but getting started is the hardest part, once u do, ur in the zone!!!!
So how do you study properly..
I mean if i got 5 subject s to study for, whats the best way to study them all without forgetting them..
Should i study each 5 every day for 3 weeks, 1 hour each....or what...whats the best way.
There's also the case on the exploding Ford. I can't remember what model it was, but there was a glitch in the fuel tank, whereby a slight rear end accident would cause a rupture and it would explode. Ford ran a test to decide whether a recall would be economically viable compared to the number of accidents that would occur and the payouts required from explosions. They decided that it would be financially cheaper to keep the car on the market, so..... KABOOM again and again.
Not really about whistle blowers as such, although it has a lot to do with business ethics
Yup, that was the Ford Pinto Case. Worked out that it would be cheaper settling the number of suits than it would be to make the necessary modifications. In the end it cost them $50million in suits and saved them only $20.9million. So I guess they (rightfully) got screwed over.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.