TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »

New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

Edit: The stuff about 9/11 starts around 10 min 30 sec mark.


This is a program about 9/11 and the issues surrounding it. Well worth a watch IMO. It was aired on the new internet tv station "The Peoples Voice" wich is a crowd founded channel who have been up and running for a few month now. Still in the early stages but I think it can catch on and evolve with time.

So, is there still someone out there that thinks al qaida did it?

Coming up to 13 years and you fucking imbeciles can't get anything right i literally figured more out in 5 seconds on that tuesday evening than you fools have done in the following decade.

Please share Oh wise one

Fuck you dickhead. You’re incapable of making reasonable inferences from information available to you. It is impossible to reason someone out of an opinion they didn’t reason themselves into.

Haha yeah I think I know your type all to well, have a nice evening

Cretin doesn’t even know how to use “to” correctly. But he’s figured out 911. Just ask him

You truly are a gift to humanity

you lick your nanna.

There's a future out there. Quit dwelling on the past.

Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by SherlockCrash Edit: The stuff about 9/11 starts around 10 min 30 sec mark. This is a program about 9/11 and the issues surrounding it. Well worth a watch IMO. It was aired on the new internet tv station "The Peoples Voice" wich is a crowd founded channel who have been up and running for a few month now. Still in the early stages but I think it can catch on and evolve with time. So, is there still someone out there that thinks al qaida did it?

what's this jist of the argument/thesis?

Re: Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by Spacey Orange what's this jist of the argument/thesis?

That the official story is made up of a bunch of lies. That evidence was destroyed without investigation and that the buildings fell in a way that defies the laws of physics.

quote:

Originally posted by OrangestO There's a future out there. Quit dwelling on the past.

Sure there is, but how that will turn out depends on if we base it on lies or truth.

I think it is possible to talk about the past at the same time as you care about the future. Infact I think they are connected

Finally..... The Rock has come back....to....BULLSHIT.

Re: Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by Spacey Orange what's this jist of the argument/thesis?

that sherlockcrash is one of life's failures and attaches himself to "secret knowledge" in attempt to feel special. likely due to being forced to lick his nanna as an adolescent. i found the argument pretty compelling.

Re: Re: Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by SherlockCrash the buildings fell in a way that defies the laws of physics.

Re: Re: Re: Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by netroM

Ofc I meant if it would have happen as they say it happened



Here you got some examples when the demolition didn't go the way they planned. As you can see it is very important that the explosions takes care of the underlying floors before the top comes down, or else the building will fall to the side. So maybe pkcRAISTLIN can explain why and how the WTC buildings could fall straight down without the use of explosives?

obviously all of the rebar in the wtc had nothing to do with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_resonance

In endeavouring to form a cohesive argument, I take it you've thoroughly studied a large portion of the documentation debunking 9/11 conspiracy theory? Here's a good place to start:

http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html

...because if you haven't, then your "opinion" is founded entirely on an emotional - not a factual, rational - response. Barring your being there, or having lost friends or family because of it, if 12+ years after the fact you're still having such an emotional response to this event, you might want to consider moving on and trying to live in the present moment. All considered, it's not too bad.

You might also want to take the time to read these, as they're great references to assist in tapping into the logical part of your noggin:

http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ass...erHigherRes.jpg

http://theconversation.com/no-youre...ur-opinion-9978

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by SherlockCrash So maybe pkcRAISTLIN can explain why and how the WTC buildings could fall straight down without the use of explosives?

because the twin towers had a steel "exoskeletan", with all the supporting steel of the building on the outside of structure, like this:



unlike the usual distribution that looks more like this:



you can see the real life example here:



why have you been unable to figure this out for yourself?

Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by SherlockCrash So, is there still someone out there that thinks al qaida did it?

So many years on, people still think that there aren't people in the world that hate the US so much, that they're willing to kill large amounts of Americans?

No really, they do hate the US that much.
It's not the average citizen's fault or even something they deserve. But something you should probably come to terms with the consequences of 60-70 or so years of external interference, sanctions, the odd bombing, assassinations, a war or two and other military shenanigans has these kind of repercussions.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice.

quote:

Originally posted by SherlockCrash Here you got some examples when the demolition didn't go the way they planned. As you can see it is very important that the explosions takes care of the underlying floors before the top comes down, or else the building will fall to the side. So maybe pkcRAISTLIN can explain why and how the WTC buildings could fall straight down without the use of explosives?

If the American government were willing to kill thousands of their own citizens by destroying two of the largest skyscrapers in the world, two civilian aircraft and also several surrounding buildings, why the fuck would they care which direction the buildings fell?

What’s even funnier about his shitty example, is that the real demolition looks nothing like the towers. In true controlled demolition form, the building collapses from the bottom up, where obviously the towers fell from the impact zone down.

quote:

Originally posted by PivotTechno In endeavouring to form a cohesive argument, I take it you've thoroughly studied a large portion of the documentation debunking 9/11 conspiracy theory? Here's a good place to start: http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html ...because if you haven't, then your "opinion" is founded entirely on an emotional - not a factual, rational - response. Barring your being there, or having lost friends or family because of it, if 12+ years after the fact you're still having such an emotional response to this event, you might want to consider moving on and trying to live in the present moment. All considered, it's not too bad. You might also want to take the time to read these, as they're great references to assist in tapping into the logical part of your noggin: http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ass...erHigherRes.jpg http://theconversation.com/no-youre...ur-opinion-9978

Haha emotional response, good one. The only persons having a emotional response in this thread is those answering me with attacks.

I have looked at information from both sides, and it is totally clear for me that the official story is a fairytale.

Maybe you should study those sites yourself?

ILLUMINATI!!!!!

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.