TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Anyone using bidule


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-17-2014 20:48:

Anyone using bidule

Started using it for orchestral templates but the workflow is rather brilliant for anything that requires manipulation.

I run it on a slave computer. It is a modular daw I suppose the simplest way to put it. The great thing is that you can easily say send midi controller envelopes from. Say a Source, like cableguys midi shaper, and end that anywhere. Makes it easier to combine synths and apply effects and have them all work together.

It's kinda a more practical version of max maps. Then you send that to your mixing computer

And since the whole resampling craze in the last 3 years , this allows you to send it to those plugins but live.use any filter with any synth and easily patch them which is a nightmare in anything but live.

anyways, it is really fucking coo l surprised nobody talks about it.


Posted by wayfinder on Mar-17-2014 22:15:

http://makingelectronicmusic.tumblr...gue-bidule-user


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-17-2014 23:23:

its rather common. Anyone that is known for sound design uses it. its free. it is rock solid. And it makes everything easier.


Posted by jayxthekoolest on Mar-18-2014 21:50:

bidule is for poor people.

http://www.analoguehaven.com/what/


Posted by meriter on Mar-18-2014 23:59:

looks pretty awesome

I've messed around with Metaplugin a bit, similar concept, still no midi communication with the AU so its useless for layering synths in logic but the vst version has that capability. This seems way more advanced though..


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-19-2014 12:48:

quote:
Originally posted by jayxthekoolest
bidule is for poor people.

http://www.analoguehaven.com/what/



your link to synth modules in reply to something that isn't a synth is telling me you might be retarded.


Posted by Raphie on Mar-19-2014 13:23:

quote:
Originally posted by jayxthekoolest
bidule is for poor people.

http://www.analoguehaven.com/what/

ROTFLMAO it is indeed, the demo vids with the Audigy are hilarious


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-19-2014 17:07:

you really don't 'have a fucking clue what it does do you. IT is something you would probably use even more if you had external gear

is max msp also for poor people ? Or does that confuse you too you fucking knob twiddling preset bitch.

Richard Devine seems to disagree with you. You have some fucking issues. It is used by pretty much everyone that doesn't have their own propriety software / hardware solution ie remote control


Posted by Evolve140 on Mar-21-2014 04:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
your link to synth modules in reply to something that isn't a synth is telling me you might be retarded.


retarded and he can't produce. anything of quality or merit anyway, yet lingers around the production forum. get a new hobby?


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-21-2014 07:14:

I just don't get the subterfuge. It is obvious they have an axe to grind and will pass off actual things that are worth knowing when they could just as easily do it without arguing with the truth.

Raphie is a fuckong child. Thst other dude has some unattended issues I would say fall on the autism spectrum. Takes one to know one.


Posted by Raphie on Mar-21-2014 11:07:

I'm just playing with you no worries
And yes i fully comprehend bidule, just not something i would like to use. As i don't work itb,it yet another "modular platform to connect vst's together"
Not using vsts at all so no use for bidule
But if you make great strides with it, power to you.


Posted by TranceElevation on Mar-21-2014 12:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
I'm just playing with you no worries
And yes i fully comprehend bidule, just not something i would like to use. As i don't work itb,it yet another "modular platform to connect vst's together"
Don't like how itb sounds so nu use for bidule
But if you make great strides with it, power to you.


Well, all the relevant pros work otb.

But yeah, bidule is for poor people, and L4C liking it raises some questions...


Posted by meriter on Mar-22-2014 00:38:

quote:
Originally posted by TranceElevation
Well, all the relevant pros work otb.

But yeah, bidule is for poor people, and L4C liking it raises some questions...


dumb post is dumb


anyway... the installer says it will run in demo mode until april 30th. Is it free to register? If it's for poor people it better be free.


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-22-2014 02:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
I'm just playing with you no worries
And yes i fully comprehend bidule, just not something i would like to use. As i don't work itb,it yet another "modular platform to connect vst's together"
Not using vsts at all so no use for bidule
But if you make great strides with it, power to you.


right but thing of what you can do with say with a midi/osc to cv converter. It is just something that well, hardware's weak points are the sequencers. They are always too rigid and quantized. In fact most people with modular setups use bidule.

Most orchestral guys for film that do mockups use it,
I mean it is used by so many people and it really isn't that hard to understand. It sin't meant to replace your daw

For example, i have a bank of chain effects, and then a bank of inputs, and i can not only automate anything with enveloppes but you can also alter the matrix as to what is sending what were. You can insert an audio crossfader for each so that the sound morphs,


It is just liberating. It does what you can't do in any daw.


Posted by DJ RANN on Mar-22-2014 16:52:

so much butthurt in this thread.

I just can't be bothered with bidule. It's great for what it does (max was always just too much of a headache) but it's really for people who want to spend hours making their soundsources or daw, rather than using it.

I think it's a great tool for any sound designer or even composer, but for the average producer, simply not ever needed.


Posted by jayxthekoolest on Mar-25-2014 17:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
your link to synth modules in reply to something that isn't a synth is telling me you might be retarded.


you don't get it. that's ok


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-26-2014 03:33:

nope. I don't get why post a link to something you seem to think is the analog equivalent but isn't. There is no hardware equivalent.


Posted by jayxthekoolest on Mar-26-2014 06:57:

quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
nope. I don't get why post a link to something you seem to think is the analog equivalent but isn't. There is no hardware equivalent.


creativity is universal


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-26-2014 12:11:

Hardwired components aren't


Posted by jayxthekoolest on Mar-26-2014 15:51:

Evil1

quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
Hardwired components aren't


like i said, poor people can't get them.


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-26-2014 15:56:

if they could do what it is I wanted to do , then yes, you could say this would be the poor version. That isn't really the case. I'm pretty sure you really don't have a fucking clue what it is because you seem to think it is a modular synth.


Posted by jayxthekoolest on Mar-26-2014 21:57:

Dunno

quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
if they could do what it is I wanted to do , then yes, you could say this would be the poor version. That isn't really the case. I'm pretty sure you really don't have a fucking clue what it is because you seem to think it is a modular synth.


you got me



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.