TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Specialization of Labor
Specialization of Labor
People continue to improve their home studios (gear, room treatments, etc.) and their mixing/mastering skills, taking on a lot of responsibility that could be divided amongst several people (writing, recording/engineering, mixing, mastering). I don�t think it�s necessarily bad, and believe people should have exposure to all elements for making a song.
But, where do we start spreading our capabilities too thin? Most won�t be experts at all aspects; most won�t have the resources to actually do some of those steps properly.
What impact does this have on final results? Someone spending more time in an area they have weaknesses instead of focusing on their elements of strength. It seems it could result in songs that don�t live up to their potential in one way or another.
I understand that EDM is not lucrative and there are built-in limitations for entry. There are always exceptions and exceptional people that will counter the above. But I think there is vast potential that benefits all of us that circumstances might be pushing out or precluding.
Just interested in other opinions and thoughts�
Re: Specialization of Labor
i won't be releasing anything in the future unless it's mixed/mastered by a professional. I've learned my lesson, although depending on the music you make and your audience, with Landr coming about I think that'll be good enough for the vast majority. How many people can even tell the difference really. Again it depends on your audience.. I'm doing my best not to sound cynical but I think you get the point. It's sort of a non-issue with the current state of things
Aye what palm said, touchay
lol
I don't necessarily disagree... although the paradigm may be shifting.
the exceptional cases will continue to garner success.
But, just look at guys like TILT. They are a model of specialization and workflow. 2-3 guys handling everything, for the best album out this year.
I think the biggest reason I lost interest in trance was my inability to balance songwriting and production. I just didn't have the patience to sit and fiddle with onscreen knobs and sliders for hours trying to chase a certain sound that I didn't know how to accomplish without trial and error. I'd be so burned out by the end of it that arranging all the patterns and automation clips into a cohesive song just seemed like too much of a chore to approach from a creative standpoint and my music sounded generic as fuck because of it.
I've been recording music with a friend of mine for the last year or so and he has a mixer that we plug guitars and keyboards into and just fuck around with. We'll record a quick loop on guitar, hit record on the mixer, let it run for 3 minutes and turn it into a song by adding layers bit by bit. It's a ton of fun and very refreshing compared to the sort of workflow you're stuck with on a DAW.
Welcome back Kysora! I wondered what had happened but you did exactly the right thing; Endlessly trying to construct a track on laborious and slow going workflows is a sure-fire way to kill your passion for making music.
I once did a week long session with Omar Rodriguez-Lopez (mars volta, Antemasque etc) - they would even go so far as to completely ban any talk of production among band members when writing, not even little comments while jamming etc. You just play, that's it, and have engineers/tech record it. Period.
It sounds extreme but his method was that role of production itself, kills pure creativity so do not allow one to bleed in to the other.
Not saying that I totally agree, but when you're regarded as one of the greatest living guitar players, you do kind of have a point.
Getting to the crux of the topic, EDM is virtually completely unique in that we have always been expected to do so many roles that in any other music genre, you would have several, if not many other people doing.
We're the sound designer, composer, arranger, sequencer, synth programmer, orchestrator, engineer, assistant engineer, producer, mix engineer and mastering engineer, all in one.
Some do it really well (like PVD and Jaytech) but others need a lot of help.
I once saw a documentary on SisterBliss (of Insomnia) in the studio and she was literally telling a guy "I want it to sound more whoofy" etc and not even touching an instrument, key or mouse.
One guy I know who had quite a successful DJ and track career,
was telling me how he doesn't step foot in a studio without his preferred engineer as he just can't do both the writing and producing without someone technical.
Just like him, some "producers" just write the melodies and have a engineer put it all together and make it sound right.
Even DeepDish would do this. For any recordings, they would hire a studio, have their engineer guy do the recording, they would then do the work in Logic to make the track, but then it was given to a protools engineer to mix.
Personally, I try to do it all myself, but that more because I love geeking out on the process. If I was serious about really wanting to put tracks out, I'd probably just invest in more things that allow me to just jam like electribes and synths etc, then treat the rest of the elements (Sound design, engineering, mixing) as completely separate / compartmentalized stages of the process, not this "do it as you go / wear all hats at once" thing.
That bit about Omar is awesome, I feel like that's the attitude I have at this point with music. I don't even save most of what I write anymore, I just have a guitar, an electronic drum kit and some Korg synth from the 80's plugged into a mini mixer, which outputs to a TC Flashback X4 looper and finally an amplifier. It's a giant mess of cables and instruments all over the floor and it's just fun as fuck to build up a nice layered loop and jam over it, then just start over and try something else.
The cool part is, I tried picking up FL again after that and I had so many new ideas and approaches that I never considered before. You know how some synths make crazy modulation sounds if you play and hold a patch, then switch to a different preset while it's still playing? I was messing around with Synth1 and really liked those sounds, so I recorded myself doing it with random patches through Edison while the rest of the song was playing and it pretty much made the whole track. You can really hear it when the bass changes and during the breakdown. And the best part? That whole song took me maybe 2 hours to write beginning to end, it doesn't sound polished but fuck, I've put weeks of daily work into tracks that I think sound terrible now, I don't think it's worth the grind anymore.
It's pretty neat what you can learn from going out of your comfort zone. All I ever knew for the better part of 7 years was a 100% software workflow, I wish I realized how much it was holding me back.
yeah i cant mix master or produce for shit but have good ideas and can arrange well i just want to let things flow i wish i could go live but im not technical at all
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Kthought I don't necessarily disagree... although the paradigm may be shifting. the exceptional cases will continue to garner success. But, just look at guys like TILT. They are a model of specialization and workflow. 2-3 guys handling everything, for the best album out this year. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RANN I once did a week long session with Omar Rodriguez-Lopez (mars volta, Antemasque etc) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter and at the drive-in, and de-facto, and bosnian rainbows, and ximena sari�ana... and le butcherettes.. and a million others.. Just saw Antemasque at the Metro a couple weeks ago. That guy has unbelievable stage presence. Same thing all the legends had. About what year did you work with them? I've read stories about recording Frances the Mute where the band was completely isolated and were told to play their parts with no actual context of the songs |
).
Given a choice, I would stick to just composition. I would leave the mixing and mastering to someone else. I'm fairly good at mixing, but I always begrudge the process. I just spent 3 days trying to fix a click or bonk in a track. It was several instruments converging only when certain notes were being played. I tried EQing, that only helped a little. I finally just removed one of the instruments, problem solved. Anyway, three days lost that I could of spent composing.
Oh well, that's bedroom producing for you, we have to do everything ourselves. Specialization of labor is ideal, but most of us don't have that luxury.
Good points sonix and zodiac, but this is really what it all comes down to;
Where do you draw the line? In EDM, especially when starting out, you simply don't have the resources to pay people for each part. Sure, you might be able to beg, steal, borrow, BJ, for help but 99% you're on your own.
This is where the traditional "producer" meaning comes in, not the broad bastardization that we use for EDM.
I know traditional "producers" that don't touch a thing in the studio. They literally give direction and everyone from Enigneers to Musicians all do their thing and the "producer" just leads the direction - in many instances they really are just going with the talent in the room.
One very well known grammy and emmy winning TV and Film composer I know, has quite a bad rep by those that truly know him (aside form him being an asshole as well) for quite literally, gathering studio musicians, having them play what they think will work, having his assistants arrange and orchestrate, then having engineers producer the final thing and him taking all the glory in his acceptance speech. He can write themes but about 90% of his work is other people's doing while he executive produces it.
I'm shit at writing melodies. I'm a ninja at engineering and mixing. I should really just hook up with someone that musical talent but is weak on the technical side, rather than always trying to do it myself lol.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.