TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Blade Runner 2049
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by AlphaStarred on Mar-15-2017 03:39:

Blade Runner 2049

A sequel directed by Denis Villeneuve, known for Sicario and the recent Arrival.



"Thirty years after the events of the first film, a new blade runner, LAPD Officer K (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what's left of society into chaos. K's discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former LAPD blade runner who has been missing for 30 years."

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1856101/?ref_=nv_sr_1


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-15-2017 13:47:

I have zero expectations for this. Unless I hear some first hand accounts of its excellence, I won't bother seeing it in the cinema. Ridley Scott has already managed to shit on his lineage once with Prometheus (not to mention Alien Covenant looks awful), and I thought Arrival was a load of cobblers. And am I the only one who's sick of Ryan Gosling being in every fucking film?


Posted by Lira on Mar-15-2017 15:08:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I thought Arrival was a load of cobblers.

There, I fixed it for you. It really was.

Watched it with my family, and they now have a better idea of what I do for a living... But now they also think the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (mentioned in the Brazilian Portuguese subtitles as "Computer Off Hypothesis") is much more powerful than a reasonable person would imagine.


Posted by Trance-M on Mar-15-2017 19:24:

I'm looking forward to it, I do like SF in general.

Arrival was better than I expected it to be, already read that some people really enjoyed it and some didn't at all.


Posted by AlphaStarred on Mar-15-2017 21:35:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I have zero expectations for this. Unless I hear some first hand accounts of its excellence, I won't bother seeing it in the cinema. Ridley Scott has already managed to shit on his lineage once with Prometheus (not to mention Alien Covenant looks awful), and I thought Arrival was a load of cobblers. And am I the only one who's sick of Ryan Gosling being in every fucking film?


You make some valid points. I haven't seen Arrival, but thought Sicario was alright, so there's at least a possibility that the Blade Runner sequel may be decent. Of course there's a huge amount of pressure on Villeneuve, given the brilliance of the original film.

He says as much himself, so hopefully his efforts will suffice to make it at least a film worth seeing:

"Denis Villeneuve noted that he's fully aware of the immense pressure he's under, and how hardcore fans of the original view the prospect of a new film: "I know that every single fan will walk into the theater with a baseball bat. I'm aware of that and I respect that, and it's okay with me because it's art. Art is risk, and I have to take risks. It's gonna be the biggest risk of my life but I'm okay with that. For me it's very exciting... It's just so inspiring, I'm so inspired. I've been dreaming to do sci-fi since I was 10 years old, and I said 'no' to a lot of sequels. I couldn't say 'no' to Blade Runner 2049 (2017). I love it too much, so I said, 'Alright, I will do it and give everything I have to make it great.'"

Despite Gosling's ubiquity, I still consider him a pretty good actor, so we'll see what happens, I guess, although my expectations aren't high, either. I think the notion of a sequel is still far better than the various ridiculous remakes they've been making throughout the years, however.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-15-2017 23:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Watched it with my family, and they now have a better idea of what I do for a living... But now they also think the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (mentioned in the Brazilian Portuguese subtitles as "Computer Off Hypothesis") is much more powerful than a reasonable person would imagine.


The film used Sapir-Whorf to explain its conceit in much the same way 1950s B-movies used "nuclear radiation!" to explain whichever over-sized crab/stick insect/tortoise the special effects crew had plonked down in the middle of a cardboard Los Angeles. And that was true of everything else the film attempted to tackle, too. A whole bunch of big ideas treated in the shallowest way possible.

quote:
Originally posted by AlphaStarred
Despite Gosling's ubiquity, I still consider him a pretty good actor


Oh, he's a perfectly good actor. I just find it hard to see him in character now, because he's been the leading man in so many films in the last few years. I also think Harrison Ford reprising all of his iconic roles 40 years on has become tired and silly. Old Indiana Jones! Old Han Solo! Old Deckard! Is anyone naive enough to get excited by these tedious reboots, rehashes and resurrections anymore?


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-16-2017 09:27:

There's just no way anyone involved is making this for the love of the art, or that because the original left something untold that needed to be answered. All the old farts just want their last paycheck before they retire.


Posted by MSZ on Mar-18-2017 15:07:

I can smell the shit already and its not my adult diaper.


Posted by DJ RANN on Mar-18-2017 17:33:

I'll try to keep an open mind on this one but I'm less than impressed with Villeneuve's films as he doesn't really know how to properly structure and present a story.

Granted, Prisoners was actually fairly well done but Sicario was 2 hours of my life I'll never get back and apart from some nice cinematography in places and one set pieces, it was strung together in a semi meaningless cobble of ideas when the main story line should have been so much stronger.

I get why he got BR2049; he does gritty darkness well but he's going to take a turd on a classic unless he figures out how to use characters and actually tell a story worth hearing.

Ryan can actually pull it off. While he's had a lot of exposure I think he has the presence to pull it off. He's a very sharp guy - and there's a reason In some respects he has the position that Harrison did 30 years ago; he's believable in a big role.


Posted by Vector A on Mar-20-2017 12:35:

I like Villeneuve. But I don't have a lot of hope for this, either.

My favorite from him was "Incendies": https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/incendies/


Posted by Lews on Mar-20-2017 15:10:

I'll probably pony up to see this in the theatres, although probably a theatre with a liquor licence, as I don't have the highest expectations. I enjoyed Sicario, but don't believe I've seen any of Villeneuve's other works. I just can't imagine this can possibly be great. But, hey, maybe I'll be wrong


Posted by Zoso on Mar-20-2017 20:16:

Being an old, grouchy, cynical skeptic...I'll hope for the best with this but expect the worst. I just hope they can do the original some semblance of justice. Either way, being the total sci-fi/dystopian lush that I am, I'll watch it multiple times.


Posted by DJ RANN on Mar-21-2017 20:48:

I'm so mind-numbingly bored of dystopian shitfests, so this film better offer a fuck load more than just a gritty backdrop, especailly as Blade Runner did it so well, 35 fucking years ago.

I truly hope they take a page from JJ abrams that real sets make for a better film rather than just terrible CGI yet again.


Posted by AlphaStarred on Mar-22-2017 02:34:

Someone should really make a movie out of Yevgeny Zamyatin's "We." Given a competent director, screenwriter, etc. it could be a really good film, based upon a really good book.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Mar-22-2017 04:00:

How come nobody's done a movie version of Brave New World yet? I see there was a TV movie in 85, but that's it. Certainly would be very relevant today.

And while we're at it, bring Margaret Atwood's Maddaddam trilogy to the big screen.


Posted by Lews on Mar-22-2017 10:30:

SyFy has been trying to do a mini-series of BNW for a few years now, not sure what's going on with that.

I'd really prefer a miniseries to a film... It's just so hard to do a book as a movie.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Mar-22-2017 13:35:

Oh I dunno, it's not like BNW is super complex. I think it could be done pretty well, under the right direction.


Posted by r5a on Mar-27-2017 02:41:

yo

ima go see this with my dad for sure. he was a big fan of the original.

ive seen the original a few times but ill have to rewatch it, its a cult classic. plus the soundtrack was amazing. a few years back a local non franchised cinema had a showing and i went with a friend and recall loving it. dont think a cinema has done that since in 10 years.

im going to go in with 0 expectations or hopes. the original writer has penned the screenplay/story so thats a plus for sequels. and the director has done some pretty nasty films so there's a lot of hope here. you've also got ejo, and leto on the cast. gosling has been able to prove his acting skills.

boys we in for a legit movie i think. feelsgoodman


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-27-2017 16:40:

It doesn't sound like you have zero expectations or hopes.


Posted by Zharen on Mar-27-2017 19:14:

Eh, as big of a Harrison Ford fan as I am, I was never all too astounded by Bladerunner. Yes Ridley Scott did well on the set pieces and the whole dystopian future look, although he sure didn't get Pan-AM or Atari right. I think the only part of the original I actually liked was JM Sebastian's toys. Needless to say, I'll be waiting for a Redbox release before I see Bladerunner2049.

Now that new real action Ghost in the Shell movie that's coming out later this week, I have higher expectations for, although I don't expect to be too impressed by it either. But it sure does look lovely.


Posted by r5a on Mar-28-2017 15:58:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
It doesn't sound like you have zero expectations or hopes.


ok yea, i hope its good but i just set the expectation correctly i guess.. the way i look at it is this

we have no idea what it will be until we see it for ourselves. i try to remain neutral. however i am teetering on the side of optimistic.

i can estimate/theorize what it might be like by quickly looking at the cast and their histories but i dont want to set the expectation it's going to be amazing/good. i just go in with an open mind trying not to expect that it will be bad or good. it'll ruin the experience.

even when it comes out i tend to ignore most reviewers, its all subjective anyway.


Posted by DJ RANN on Mar-28-2017 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Zharen
Eh, as big of a Harrison Ford fan as I am, I was never all too astounded by Bladerunner. Yes Ridley Scott did well on the set pieces and the whole dystopian future look, although he sure didn't get Pan-AM or Atari right. I think the only part of the original I actually liked was JM Sebastian's toys. Needless to say, I'll be waiting for a Redbox release before I see Bladerunner2049.

Now that new real action Ghost in the Shell movie that's coming out later this week, I have higher expectations for, although I don't expect to be too impressed by it either. But it sure does look lovely.


Ghost in the shell vs Blade Runner? FML

You've seen the trailers right? It's looks terrible and the reviews so far are slating it, for not even living up to the original anime, so this version is going to be robocop with tits.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-28-2017 18:23:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
this version is going to be robocop with tits.

You say that like it's a bad thing.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-28-2017 18:39:

I'd buy that for a dollar, etc.


Posted by Zharen on Mar-28-2017 19:52:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I'd buy that for a dollar, etc.



Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.