TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- If we can only listen to pre-2010 or post-2010 dance music forever, which would it be?
If we can only listen to pre-2010 or post-2010 dance music forever, which would it be?
The year 2010 is completely arbitrary and this thread is purely fantasy but if you can only pick one, which would it be?
Post-2010 because you can always hope for a remix?
After all, Charlotte de Witte has just remixed Age of Love, Deborah de Luca remade Children, and I'm sure there are plenty of other options. It's a bit more difficult to have it the other way around unless we hire some theoretical physicists with a time machine 
Tru tru. Pre-2010 has 20+ years of dance music for enjoyment while post-2010 has unlimited potential.
A more interesting situation would be if, somehow, the entirety of pre-2010 electronic dance music was erased from collective memory, would any of those old classics ever be recreated? For argument's sake, let's also include any post-2010 remixes or remakes of pre-2010s tracks.
Basically, January 1, 2010 starts Year Zero, and everything that was created after then is all there ever has been.
/has been watching a bit too much Alternate History Hub
I've been listening to a lot minimal lately ...pre 2010 so I'd go with that ...I think a lot of the current stuff is some sort of tribute to older music anyway.
So the choice is between 30+ years of dance music... or 12 years?
Yes, I just assumed this would be an easy choice due to people's preference of tracks and artists
I only listen to swinging circus house from 2010
Yes, everything on vinyl for both options.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sykonee A more interesting situation would be if, somehow, the entirety of pre-2010 electronic dance music was erased from collective memory, would any of those old classics ever be recreated? |
trap and grime remixs of cafe del mar please. yung 52 and lil energy colab
I did post that as bit of a joke, but thinking about it more, that scenario does leave some fascinating situations in its wake.
For instance, it basically erases Aphex Twin's influence on so-o-o-o much of electronic music. And nor could you say, "Well, someone else could do something similar", because so much of what Richard D. James created in those early years was with his own, custom-made gear, and almost entirely on the fly as inspiration hit him.
I'll allow that this scenario allows for anything that was made in the post-2010 era does still exist, so any music in that era that was influenced by Aphex Twin can still exist, but I find the odds of another run like Mr. James' '90s occurring infinitesimally small.
You must be a fan of nonsensical time travel paradox movies.
aphid twin sucks
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sykonee A more interesting situation would be if, somehow, the entirety of pre-2010 electronic dance music was erased from collective memory, would any of those old classics ever be recreated? For argument's sake, let's also include any post-2010 remixes or remakes of pre-2010s tracks. Basically, January 1, 2010 starts Year Zero, and everything that was created after then is all there ever has been. /has been watching a bit too much Alternate History Hub |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SYSTEM-J You must be a fan of nonsensical time travel paradox movies. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sykonee A more interesting situation would be if, somehow, the entirety of pre-2010 electronic dance music was erased from collective memory, would any of those old classics ever be recreated? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djthunderbird Secondly I'm a firm believer in "happy accidents". Loads of sounds that came to define certain genres of electronic music and which later became tropes were discovered by accident. To this category I add your 303 acid basslines, larger than life hoover sounds etc. Of course some sounds would probably still be discovered today. Perhaps the happy piano house sound, but would it be as soulful as it once were? Thirdly I lean on the Infinite Monkey Theorem which in short proves that even if we filled our observable universe with monkeys on typewriters, they still wouldnt be able to come up with Romeo & Juliet. |
I love how much mental energy you two are expending on such a nonsensical scenario.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djthunderbird Thirdly I lean on the Infinite Monkey Theorem which in short proves that even if we filled our observable universe with monkeys on typewriters, they still wouldnt be able to come up with Romeo & Juliet. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SYSTEM-J I love how much mental energy you two are expending on such a nonsensical scenario. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djthunderbird Thirdly I lean on the Infinite Monkey Theorem which in short proves that even if we filled our observable universe with monkeys on typewriters, they still wouldnt be able to come up with Romeo & Juliet. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.