Buying a new PC for music. Need tips!

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Buying a new PC for music. Need tips!

Posted by toka on Dec-02-2002 19:30:

Buying a new PC for music. Need tips!

Hey!

I will soon upgrade my PC and totally going softhware. Im thinking of buying a AMD Athlon 2,4ghz Processor. Upgrade my SDRAM memory from 512 to 1gig.

Should i got for a AMD or P4 processor?

regards
toka

Posted by Floorfiller on Dec-02-2002 21:28:

i don't know about the processor, but the gig sounds good if not more... i would say this should be the minimum and just make sure that you got a good soundcard

Posted by Pointy on Dec-03-2002 06:36:

Ahhh the old P4 vs AMD debate I like AMD over P4, although for music production, the P4 might be better as the new one's (the one with HT on the logo) are apparently awesome with multi-tasking which is nice for sound production

Posted by hey cheggy on Dec-03-2002 12:29:

Don't forget about a big ass hard drive. Those wav. files take up an enormouse amount of space after a while.

By the way, are you sure you're doing the right thing. Perhaps you could keep your best synth. I mean after all, you're still gonna need a keyboard/midi controller. You'll find making music with a mouse to be really annoying. I know i can't stand moving all those nobs on the screen with a mouse.

Posted by xfer on Dec-04-2002 02:28:

If its only for music I would definitly go with a P4 3.06 and with Hyper Threading. I know alot use athlon because there cheap but trust me I have built athlon systems that should run better then p4 and there is always some issue with athlon... and from experince i think they are just crap But if you want a real Digital Audio Workstation get a MAC, sorry but the new g4's own. In my friends studio he has P4 2.53 system and a dual 800mhz G4. guess what gets used more?

And athlon guys don't take this personal for gaming athlons own

Posted by DJ Chrono on Dec-04-2002 02:37:

well I'd go with the p4. and if at all possible try to get RD Ram! If it will fit into ur motherboard that is..

RD ram is alot more efficiant and even with less it still outpreforms SD. trust me I have a gig of SD and it doesnt feel like alot in comparison!

Posted by bumbum on Dec-04-2002 04:10:

intel 4 2.0mhz or more
512megs to a gig of ram
delta 1010 (10 in 10 out ) for midi recording
edirol da 2496( 2 mic pre 2 direct boxs for guitars.6 in )
5 or more usb ports
2 fire wire ports

Posted by Pete K on Dec-05-2002 20:50:

forget the amd processor i'd go with an intel xeon that should do the trick

Posted by 531.am on Dec-08-2002 15:53:

man I've seen some whicked sound cards, wish I had about 2 grand to blow on a puter

Posted by DJMikeyP on Dec-08-2002 20:22:

Hey -

Just a sidenote, but have you checked out www.mcglen.com? You can get a barebones system for so damn cheap over there that you could use the leftover money on other things - like the kickass soundcard. All you have to do is add your own videocard and harddrive.

Posted by xfer on Dec-09-2002 00:11:

haha thats not cheap BTW. i could build the same barebones systems for half of that

Posted by Haimoimoi on Dec-09-2002 23:38:

If you have a lot of cash to throw around, you might consider dual Athalon MPs. If you use more than one software synth at a go while previewing music, this will help. The problem with hyperthreading is that the virtual CPU can get starved, and almost never reaches its peak as with a real second CPU. Tomshardware.com did a side by side comparison with a 3.6 gHz P4 and a 3.0 P4 with Hyperthreading enabled. The real-world multitasking results were pretty heavily in favor of HT technology, while the benchmarks/games often sided with the faster chip.

As for RDRAM, it's going to be pretty scarce soon. With DDR2 on the way and 400mHz memory already avaialble, the performance gap is narrowing considerably. The VIA KT400 chipset is out, though it doesn't "officially" support the 400mHz memory setting yet. The reviewers also claimed that stability took a nosedive with 400mHz DDR, but there was no real indication of that was a chipset or a memory thing.

Posted by xfer on Dec-10-2002 03:57:

As i stated before athlons are for gaming only even MP's. Thats what toms hardware benchmarks are based on. Do some bench marking on athlons with music software. Then you tell what you think about athlon. You are definitly right about Rdram is overpriced and not that big of a deal compared to the cheaper DDR