TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- Whats the best: Reason, Logic, Fruityloops
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Whats the best: Reason, Logic, Fruityloops
Choose the best program from the list..
None of them are better or worse than each other.
I only chose Reason 2.0 because it's the only one I can use properly.
hmm.. you have anything else?
Not at the moment, no, but I have tried most music programs out there... except Logic.
My guess is this is a very useless topic...
I'm using Fruityloops 3.56 because I can use it best and I like the advantages it has (and I also have Cubase SX and Reason 2). But that doesn't mean the others don't have advantages obver Fruityloops. Probably there'll be some dumbnuts shouting off "Fruity sucks, Reason rules" like we used to have 
You forgot some other neat programs though :
- Cubase SX
- Orion
- Buzz
- Madtracker (or any other tracker)
So for those people it'll be hard to judge 'which one is best'. As I said, not a very useful topic mate in my opinion 
Regards,
LW
fruity by miles in my experience, the sequencer on reason is intolerable lol, never got into cubase really.
plus the pro producers who have came out by using fruity...
S.H.O.K.K., Flutlicht, Comicman, Parker, Guyver, Ronski...
fruityloops... don't use the version you have there, but i tihnk fruity.. but as said, it's just caus i use it and i think it's good
have tryied out reason some, but got back to fruity
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Project T Comicman, |
logic + hardware is the only way for me!
Damn how many of these post's are we gonna have. Ive heard badass songs come from each one of these sequencers. Shit people even use trackers and make good songs. I tryed buzz and i gave up in 2 mins because it was to confusing. Others might say the same thing about the sequencer i use. None of these are better then each other. It depends on how easy you pick up on that particular sequencer and how you use it. I took a liking to LOGIC, because it made sense to me only me. Do you see what im getting at. im shure reason , fruity users think the same way about their sequencers.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DaveC Fruity sucks, Reason rules |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DaveC Fruity sucks, Reason rules |

| quote: |
| fruity by miles in my experience, the sequencer on reason is intolerable lol |

| quote: |
| - Madtracker (or any other tracker) |
i dont see what all the fuss is about with fruity.. the way its made is all over the place...
logic i have had a little experiance with @ college.. its pretty good but you need hardware to use it to its full potential.. but i found it way too long-winded..
i use reason, i love reason. i dont use the sequencer (as its world reknowned as being toss).. what i love about reason is its all there in front of you... its even nicer on dual monitor
the softsynths and all the other soft-hardware looks really good (very much like the real thing). not to mention the way u have to plug everything in the way u want it (which is supremely cool and makes things a little less confusing for me)
but there is one thing that makes reason better than all the rest... and thats the way the wires bounce when u turn the rack round 
but there is one thing that makes reason better than all the rest... and thats the way the wires bounce when u turn the rack round
LOL!
I thought that was amazing when i first got reason... kept pressing tab for about ten minutes! hehe
Actually I'm a Reason2-Addict.
But well...I kinda despair with reason2. I'm using it with ReWire2 connected to Cubase SX, otherwhise Reason's sound quality would be a bit weak imho.
I tried Fruity once, and I gotta say: Nice Soundquality !
I think of switching to Fruity for good...but I'm not sure yet 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Project T Ronski... |
U ppl have to check this out:
http://www.em411.com/show.php?area=...1&page_number=3
| quote: |
| Originally posted by robstar U ppl have to check this out: http://www.em411.com/show.php?area=...1&page_number=3 |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by robstar U ppl have to check this out: http://www.em411.com/show.php?area=...1&page_number=3 |


| quote: |
| Originally posted by dEEkAy Ronski is using fruity ? The guy who makes the RONSKI SPEED Mixes for Euphonic ? |

does anyone use Rewire with Cubase?
i have used rewire with cubase before. it works fine except when i very first press play it plays sounds that its not supposed to from reason and then there is a very slight delay after that, but everything works fine, in sync, etc. i actually like using them together because you can work in reason and use vst instruments at the same time. also, you can use vst effects on reason instruments. another thing is that you can use the cubase sequencer to control reason instruments as well as the instruments in cubase, or you can use the reason sequencer for the reason instruments and the cubase sequencer for cubase stuff, or a combination... that is nice because if you want to take a project you already started in reason and expand on it in cubase then all you have to do is load up rewire and you reason file and then just start working. i want to try layering some vst and reason synths this way too, for example fm7 + subtractor and see what kind of sound i can come up with.
I'd say whatever your comfortable with. I've been using Fruityloops for a year, and it doesn't stop me, or limit me in making the style of music that I like to make. I thought Fruity was a 'techno lovers' dream, but with more thinking, practice, and experience, I've been able to make many genre's with it. At first glance, it looks like a 'Playskool' product, but when you actually tweak those knobs, and play with the sequencer, you'll find that there's a monster inside that little jack-in-the-box. -Mental
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lightworks Now what did I mention in my topic above this one? People that are so predictable... jeez ![]() Right on Robstar |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.