question about nothing returning mix and for an angel

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- question about nothing returning mix and for an angel

Posted by mndeg on Mar-09-2003 00:10:

question about nothing returning mix and for an angel

the for an angel and e-werk club mix are exactly the same
so are james holden nothing and the returning 93 mix

whats what?

Posted by Technaut on Mar-09-2003 00:13:

Posted by mndeg on Mar-09-2003 00:14:

^
wtf ?

Posted by Ibiza Dreams on Mar-09-2003 00:20:

Nothing

I think you're right about the For An Angel E-Werk mix being the same as Original... there might be slight differences, all I know is that E-Werk was a club Paul van Dyk spun at.

However, Nothing (Original) and Nothing (Returning 93 Mix) are very different. The original has the clear vocals while Returning 93 mix has the extremely distorted ones... this is apart from the track being completely diffeerent of course.

To see which track you have, listen for the vocals OR listen for that very unique rolling bassline characteristic of Returning 93 mix... also Original mix is around the 7 minute mark, while Returning 93 is around the 9 minute mark.

Original is alright, but Returning 93 is a breath of fresh air for the trance community... I love it.

Posted by mndeg on Mar-09-2003 00:22:

i think my returning mix was named original

Posted by TeKnoHe@d2025 on Mar-09-2003 00:31:

quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
i think my returning mix was named original

When the tune was first released it was named Mix 1 and Mix 2. Mix 1 was the original with normal vocals, and Mix 2 was the one with distorted/almost backwards vocals. So Mix 2 = Returning 92 Mix

I don't know if that was what was causing confusion or what, but it should clear that problem up for someone in the future

Posted by tranceman78 on Mar-09-2003 00:31:

quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
i think my returning mix was named original

the original mix has a xylophone type sound in it.

Posted by Az on Mar-09-2003 00:32:

the vocals in the 93 returning mix are excellent
Holden has a real knack for cutting vocals, and starting them at different points, without making them sound shite
it's harder than you'd think

Posted by mndeg on Mar-09-2003 00:33:

i think return93 mix is what my mix 2 of nothing is
edit: above guy was right

Posted by bundantoh on Mar-09-2003 06:05:

e-werk and the original are different, if you listen to them back to back. i have the 45 rpm cd......but yea. they have subtle differences

Posted by victor on Mar-11-2003 05:57:

quote:
Originally posted by bundantoh
e-werk and the original are different, if you listen to them back to back. i have the 45 rpm cd......but yea. they have subtle differences

still dont see the diff

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-11-2003 08:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Az
the vocals in the 93 returning mix are excellent
Holden has a real knack for cutting vocals, and starting them at different points, without making them sound shite
it's harder than you'd think

It's damn near impossible... I tried it and it didn't quite sound like Nothing

Posted by Az on Mar-11-2003 17:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
It's damn near impossible... I tried it and it didn't quite sound like Nothing

it's all about whereabouts you cut and cue the vocals, I'm sure it's possible with practice, maybe using em in rex loop in reason....

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-11-2003 17:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Az
it's all about whereabouts you cut and cue the vocals, I'm sure it's possible with practice, maybe using em in rex loop in reason....

Yes, but there's no way I'll ever get enough patience to make it sound good