TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Lol @ Avb


Posted by chesco on Mar-14-2003 09:32:

Lol @ Avb

Whats this I hear about burren remixing umek's - gatex with speedy j's - krek.

Please say it ain't so.

Avb stick to the hand in the air trance you play and leave techno out of it. really, there is no need. so quit now while your ahead..



Posted by Matt on Mar-14-2003 09:39:

1. Armin did this awhile ago
2. It's a lot better than what Tiesto did with it
3. It was just a short project for Armin... not really a remix.


Posted by Dave_Masters on Mar-14-2003 09:53:


4. Its Buuren not Burren


Posted by Sand Leaper on Mar-14-2003 10:08:

5.It was a mash up of Kreck and Gatex,not a remix,and it pisses on all the other remixes,including Umek's own.

6.At least listen to it before you post more prejudiced guff.


Posted by whiskers on Mar-14-2003 11:46:

7. armin can spin and remix whatever the hell he wants, be it techno, or britney spears


Posted by Psygnosis on Mar-14-2003 11:56:

quote:
Originally posted by DaveC

4. Its Buuren not Burren


Pffft


Posted by chesco on Mar-14-2003 11:57:

quote:
Originally posted by whiskers
7. armin can spin and remix whatever the hell he wants, be it techno, or britney spears


I don't deny that gatex is shite, but kreck is a brilliant techno tune and needs no additions.

Secondly you are all the fannys that were up in arms cos mauro picotto started spinning a more techno orientated style so why is it when van burren(I'll spell it however the hell I like) does atechno tune nobody says anything.

It seems to me he's trying to get his foot in the door.

Dave c thats a compelling argument you have in defence of your idol. "its buuren not burren". You dunce.

My point here is in defence of picotto. You all put the man down, said this and that about him, now avb is doing a techno tune and I am the only one that has anything to say on the matter. you all have very apparent double standards.

mosaic I'm not denying it's better than the tiesto mix, anything is.


Posted by Martin McG on Mar-14-2003 12:02:

yeah picottos cool


Posted by whiskers on Mar-14-2003 12:03:

personally, i have NEVER said anything about picotto, and if armin has one foot out of the door - he's welcome to leave, i'm not going to cry and whine and piss and try to hold him back.

van burren...


Posted by chesco on Mar-14-2003 12:12:

quote:
Originally posted by whiskers
personally, i have NEVER said anything about picotto, and if armin has one foot out of the door - he's welcome to leave, i'm not going to cry and whine and piss and try to hold him back.

van burren...


lets just hope it's a one off then cos i couldn't see van burren making a career in techno. He should just stick to what people know him for.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-14-2003 12:38:

quote:
Originally posted by chesco
why is it when van burren(I'll spell it however the hell I like) does a techno tune nobody says anything.


Maybe because van Buuren didn't do a techno tune?
He just played 2 tracks on top of each other.

Why? Because he wanted to.


Posted by sifntj0r on Mar-14-2003 13:11:

ahahaha dont offend the techno lovers


oh no, they might just wake up from the deep sleep their music puts them in


techno = zzz


Posted by chesco on Mar-14-2003 13:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Maybe because van Buuren didn't do a techno tune?
He just played 2 tracks on top of each other.

Why? Because he wanted to.


Right he didn't do a techno tune, so then if he is the king of trance music then why is he playing two techno tunes over each other. oh the outrage. Pricks


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-14-2003 13:41:

quote:
Originally posted by chesco
Right he didn't do a techno tune, so then if he is the king of trance music then why is he playing two techno tunes over each other. oh the outrage. Pricks


Read the message again, dear messiah of Techno (sic).


Posted by Ian on Mar-14-2003 13:42:

quote:
Originally posted by chesco
Right he didn't do a techno tune, so then if he is the king of trance music then why is he playing two techno tunes over each other. oh the outrage. Pricks


I think that Armin has been DJing and producing long enough to not give a fuck what the hell people think about what he does, It doesn't matter what you lot think, it was in the past, and he did it, you can't change that, so stop crying about it please


Posted by Az on Mar-14-2003 14:03:

quote:
Originally posted by chesco
Right he didn't do a techno tune, so then if he is the king of trance music then why is he playing two techno tunes over each other. oh the outrage. Pricks

you're the one that made the thread
for the record it was for a 12 hour set, and he wanted a little more variation than just 12 hours of prog and trance.....
why the hell are you making this thread? stick to what your good at, raping picotto


Posted by Dave_Masters on Mar-14-2003 14:04:

quote:
Originally posted by chesco

Dave c thats a compelling argument you have in defence of your idol. "its buuren not burren". You dunce.




What the fuck?

I wasnt arguing anything you asshole, just correcting your spelling mistake. Why am i a dunce? I didnt spell it wrong.




Posted by fastmp3 on Mar-14-2003 14:22:

guys i suggest ignoring this thread ... chesco is a dumb guy


Posted by Robert on Mar-14-2003 14:26:

armin has made techno years ago with some people before all this.


Posted by chesco on Mar-14-2003 17:10:

quote:
Originally posted by fastmp3
guys i suggest ignoring this thread ... chesco is a dumb guy


Yip, and i ain't denying that for a minute


Posted by George Kendall on Mar-14-2003 17:23:

Oh god....the idiot is back again.


Posted by victor on Mar-14-2003 17:46:

wow

i read the first message of the thread and said to myself...

"FLAMING"

lol


Posted by whiskers on Mar-14-2003 18:13:

Re: wow

quote:
Originally posted by victor
i read the first message of the thread and said to myself...

"FLAMING"

lol




Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.