TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- The Reality Of War
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by Renegade on Mar-19-2003 06:52:

Exclamation The Reality Of War

With all this rhetoric getting thrown backwards and forwards, it can be easy to forget what war is really about : wanton death and destruction. When you see the images released by the Pentagon of Laser-Guided Missiles plowing clinically into "military targets" with the precision and aesthetics of a computer game utterly detached from reality, please keep these images, taken from the first Gulf war in mind:

The True Cost of War

Then imagine these images repeated 100,000 times over in a country already decimated by regular bombings and incredible poverty. If anyone believes that the Iraqi people are going to be skipping up to their American "liberators" in Baghdad at the end of the war having had to experience these images first hand - charred, limbless friends and relatives left to die amongst the rubble of what were once their homes - you need a reality check. This is a small part of what war costs the average citizen, and doesn't even take into consideration the abhorrent conditions refugees will be forced to endure, nor the increased destruction of infrastructure and property that will make the lives of the Iraqi citizen even harder to bear.

You can form your own opinion on the war, but - regardless of your position - don't forget what, at base, it all comes down to and who suffers. These images demonstrate why the terrors of war should only ever instigated as a very last resort.


EDIT: All the photos with commentary from the original author can be accessed at this address:

http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0212/pt_intro.html


Posted by klingklang77 on Mar-19-2003 07:21:

NO WAR- NO WAY!!!!


Posted by Mental Exodus on Mar-19-2003 14:31:

Be Cool!

I agree that war is war. No matter what your doing. I also totally agree on the gulf coverage issue. Did u know that reporters who strayed from the Army and got real stories and tried to air them were really given a hard time by the CIA! Im guessing the same thing happened in Afghanistan and will repeat in Iraq. While this helps the P.R. department allot it continues to cloud the judgment of the average person who doesn�t really care about what happens but still votes. Renegade, U stated that the area has "incredible poverty" I agree with this. However. Can it not be argued that the billions of oil $$$ that Sadam pockets for himself and spends on 25 palaces and large cruise boats should be in the hands of the people and therefore gives further justification the need for US liberation? The point here is that the US apparently "intends" to help the people by remodeling the government so the $$$ will find its way into the peoples hands. People have already argued that this will not happen for many reasons but the war in the area isnt over so no one can really tell. Also it takes a very long time to reform a country. This is a problem cuz many of the people who have an opinion would like to see a turn around in a few weeks and then flame the gov for apparently lying over immediate placement of money and political spotlight.


Posted by Renegade on Mar-19-2003 15:42:

quote:
. Did u know that reporters who strayed from the Army and got real stories and tried to air them were really given a hard time by the CIA! Im guessing the same thing happened in Afghanistan and will repeat in Iraq.


Yeah, Patrick Turnley breifly mentions it on his webpage (the second link) and I saw something about it on Fox News of all places I think it was. Basically, if you want to go down there with the soldiers and take pictures of the action, you need a "press pass" of sorts - personal identification that authorizes you to take these pictures. The journalists like Patrick Turnley, however, were made well aware that if any "unsavoury" images get back - that is, images the army/government does not want you to see - you have the press pass taken off you and are either forced to go home or, at the very least, forced away from the front lines. This expalins why we have seen so few images of the bloodshed from the the Gulf War / Afghanistan, which results in two things:

1) The public are deliberately made ignorant of much of what is occuring in these wars - namely they are being fed "propoganda" in the sense that the government dictates what they are and are not allowed to see.

2) In this state of ignorance - where no blood-shed ever makes it onto our TV screens - we are made to think that the operations are clean and precise, with bloodshed reduced to bland statistics, "collateral damage". How can we morally oppose a war when we don't properly understand what's happening?


It's worth noting that coverage of the World Trade Center tragedies (and they were tragedies) wasn't censored at all. Can you imagine people supporting the attack on Afghanistan if they had the deaths broadcast into their home? Even if we only count the reported deaths, the tally far exceeds the death tally from the WTC disaster, yet because these deaths are faceless - because we have no humane way of connecting with these "numbers" - the outpouring of sympathy is far diminished and the "public opinion" war is easily won. Take a look for yourself:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1740538.stm

Then take a look at what they have in store for Iraq this time around. Notice the terminology:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003...ain537928.shtml

quote:
On the second day, the plan calls for launching another 300 to 400 cruise missiles.

"There will not be a safe place in Baghdad," said one Pentagon official who has been briefed on the plan.

"The sheer size of this has never been seen before, never been contemplated before," the official said.


quote:
"We want them to quit. We want them not to fight," says Harlan Ullman, one of the authors of the Shock and Awe concept which relies on large numbers of precision guided weapons.

"So that you have this simultaneous effect, rather like the nuclear weapons at Hiroshima, not taking days or weeks but in minutes," says Ullman.


quote:
"You're sitting in Baghdad and all of a sudden you're the general and 30 of your division headquarters have been wiped out. You also take the city down. By that I mean you get rid of their power, water. In 2,3,4,5 days they are physically, emotionally and psychologically exhausted," Ullman tells Martin.


Not one mention of civilian casualties. Once again the dead are relegated to meaningless numbers so that we can sit back and watch the fireworks in "awe" without that pesky moral twinge: "I wonder if this is morally right? Of course it is, it's for their own good!".

Utterly, utterly reprehensible:

http://www.friendsjournal.org/conte...il/feature.html



quote:
Renegade, U stated that the area has "incredible poverty" I agree with this. However. Can it not be argued that the billions of oil $$$ that Sadam pockets for himself and spends on 25 palaces and large cruise boats should be in the hands of the people and therefore gives further justification the need for US liberation? The point here is that the US apparently "intends" to help the people by remodeling the government so the $$$ will find its way into the peoples hands.


Partly true - Saddam Hussein is as corrupt as any other iron-fist dictator - but the sanctions placed on Iraq after the Gulf War basically destroyed Iraqs economy and even if Saddam Hussein were the most humanitarian man on the planet, he just does not have the means to feed his own people.

See here for the "myths" about Iraqi sanctions:

http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pag...lity_print.html

And this is a World Health Organisation report about the impact the sanctions have had on Iraqi society (it's old -1996 - but, if anything, things have gotten even worse since then):

http://www.who.int/disasters/repo/5249.html

The old "it's all Saddam's fault" line just isn't true.


Posted by FuzzyGreen on Mar-19-2003 20:03:

Yeah, these are the realities of war. This is what a dangerous government like Saddam's regime can do to people. What an evil man to do this to people. I am so glad and honored that I live in a country where we can put a stop to suffering like this. I thank god that we have the power to put a stop to evil killers. Thank you God for my country.


Posted by Mental Exodus on Mar-19-2003 20:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade

The old "it's all Saddam's fault" line just isn't true.


??? Didnt we stop trading with him because he wouldnt allow inspections and didnt follow the UN's laws? Wouldnt this make it his fault?


Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 04:52:

Maybe i should post pics of 9.11...of innocent people going about their daily lives in a non war time situation that where attacked....save your pictures...those where soldiers in war times.


Posted by Cyrus King on Mar-20-2003 05:14:

Renegade has considerably prroved you wrong on a multitude of times Tiesto14. He has backed up his arguments with sources and logical explanations... where you just idiotically reply with childish remarks from that empty space between your ears.


Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 05:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
Renegade has considerably prroved you wrong on a multitude of times Tiesto14. He has backed up his arguments with sources and logical explanations... where you just idiotically reply with childish remarks from that empty space between your ears.


ok fine let me get some pics...let me show you what it looks like for busnies women and men to be attacked...in NON war times...let me show you what IIIIIIIIIIIIII saw with my OWN eyes in person...while you sat back on your fucking ass safe while i was running for my life...you shut the fuck up you scumbag...you know nothing...you dont know what its liek to be attacked...I DO....


Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 05:48:

HERES WHAT I SAW U ******...THESE ARE INNOCENT PEOPLE IN NON WAR TIMES....I REPEAT NON NON NON NON NON WAR TIMES!!!!!


For those who jumped, the fall lasted 10 seconds. They struck the ground at just less than 150 miles per hour � not fast enough to cause unconsciousness while falling, but fast enough to ensure instant death on impact. People jumped from all four sides of the north tower. They jumped alone, in pairs and in groups.



















SHOW ME ONE MILITARY OFFICIAL OR SOLDIER...JUST ONE..THESE ARE INNOCENT PEOPLE IN NON WAR TIMES




Posted by Cyrus King on Mar-20-2003 05:48:

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14
ok fine let me get some pics...let me show you what it looks like for busnies women and men to be attacked...in NON war times...let me show you what IIIIIIIIIIIIII saw with my OWN eyes in person...while you sat back on your fucking ass safe while i was running for my life...you shut the fuck up you scumbag...you know nothing...you dont know what its liek to be attacked...I DO....


First off... everytime you try and validate your points.. it always comes back to you trying to get people to feel sorry for you becuase you witnessed 9/11. I know MANY people.... including a doctor who was probably closer to the buildings than any regular individual in the city who witnessed everything from the beginning to the end.. who sat there waiting to help people but no one would come becuase they were dead. Dont think you were the only one who was affected by 9/11... the whole world was.... but rememeber... the world experiences 9/11 in different forms every single day... yet we dont hear about it.

And with me being attacked.... do you know what it feels like to live in fear for your life as bombs are being blown up outside your house.... do you know how it feels like to be in a war.... to know people who have been executed???? HAve you lived in the middeast during the Iran / IRaq war.... MILLIONS died then... and my family was affected.... so you shut the fuck up...and stop crying about 9/11.


Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 05:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
First off... everytime you try and validate your points.. it always comes back to you trying to get people to feel sorry for you becuase you witnessed 9/11. I know MANY people.... including a doctor who was probably closer to the buildings than any regular individual in the city who witnessed everything from the beginning to the end.. who sat there waiting to help people but no one would come becuase they were dead. Dont think you were the only one who was affected by 9/11... the whole world was.... but rememeber... the world experiences 9/11 in different forms every single day... yet we dont hear about it.

And with me being attacked.... do you know what it feels like to live in fear for your life as bombs are being blown up outside your house.... do you know how it feels like to be in a war.... to know people who have been executed???? HAve you lived in the middeast during the Iran / IRaq war.... MILLIONS died then... and my family was affected.... so you shut the fuck up...and stop crying about 9/11.



FUCK YOU AND YOUR FAMILY....ROT IN HELL


Posted by Cyrus King on Mar-20-2003 05:53:

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14
FUCK YOU AND YOUR FAMILY....ROT IN HELL


Is that the best you can do?...LOOOOOOOL

You are so sad

P.S THE MANWHO CONCOCTED THIS MASSACRE WAS TRAINED BY YOUR MILITARY.....BY YOUR SOLDIERS!!


Posted by malek on Mar-20-2003 05:57:

hey tiesto, aren't you supposed to stay away from political forums?? wait maybe some of us should msg the moderators and get you banned from here again!


Posted by Yoepus on Mar-20-2003 06:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
the world experiences 9/11 in different forms every single day... yet we dont hear about it.


examples?

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
See here for the "myths" about Iraqi sanctions:

http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pag...lity_print.html


From the site: "Myth 2: Iraq possesses, and seeks to build, weapons of mass destruction. If unchecked, and without economic sanctions, Iraq could, and certainly would, threaten its neighbors."

In all fairness no one can claim this is a myth (or a truth), it is simply an opinion. The fact that Iraq does possess weapons of mass destruction however is fairly well believed do to inconsistencies in those weapons which they claim to have been destroyed yet no one saw them destroy.

Furthermore I completely understand the horribles of war, however war should not always be of last resort and considered the worst thing to undertake, there are many worse things. Perhaps you haven't seen the images of Saddam's workings on his own people, as to me that seemed much worse then war could every be. Unforteantly I was unable to find some good links to such photos afte scouring the web for 5 min, but encourage your effort.


Posted by occrider on Mar-20-2003 06:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
examples?



From the site: "Myth 2: Iraq possesses, and seeks to build, weapons of mass destruction. If unchecked, and without economic sanctions, Iraq could, and certainly would, threaten its neighbors."

In all fairness no one can claim this is a myth (or a truth), it is simply an opinion. The fact that Iraq does possess weapons of mass destruction however is fairly well believed do to inconsistencies in those weapons which they claim to have been destroyed yet no one saw them destroy.


I agree Renegade ... you yourself never replied to my thread stating that you are not assured that Iraq possesses nor seeks the capability to build WMDs.


Posted by Dupz on Mar-20-2003 06:56:

quote:
HERES WHAT I SAW U ******...THESE ARE INNOCENT PEOPLE IN NON WAR TIMES....I REPEAT NON NON NON NON NON WAR TIMES!!!!!


Why do you point out so boldly that it was during "non war" times?? The people who did this to your country have been fighting against every regime your country has thrown at them for the past 50 years. For them they were at war with you LONG ago.. all they did was bring war from their doorsteps to yours.

Chill out Tiesto14.. Irrational reactions are the reason we see such a vicious cycle of hate and destruction. And please dont continually bring up the point of actually seeing these terrible events, because i'm sure 80% of the worlds people have seen much worse. stop feeling sorry for yourself. it's not going to help.


Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 07:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
Is that the best you can do?...LOOOOOOOL

You are so sad

P.S THE MANWHO CONCOCTED THIS MASSACRE WAS TRAINED BY YOUR MILITARY.....BY YOUR SOLDIERS!!



so what does that make it less then what it is or make it that we deserved it?....stfu u werent there...it was alot different in person....

Sorry but i dont want another 9.11....and if that means we have to blow up a Iraq then so fucking be it....the world will be a better place and America will be safer....some times people have to die for that....like my 3 friends died in the WTC.....i dont see you screaming for their lives to be saved....so fuck offffffffffffffffffff


Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 07:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Dupz
Why do you point out so boldly that it was during "non war" times?? The people who did this to your country have been fighting against every regime your country has thrown at them for the past 50 years. For them they were at war with you LONG ago.. all they did was bring war from their doorsteps to yours.

Chill out Tiesto14.. Irrational reactions are the reason we see such a vicious cycle of hate and destruction. And please dont continually bring up the point of actually seeing these terrible events, because i'm sure 80% of the worlds people have seen much worse. stop feeling sorry for yourself. it's not going to help.



i say NON war times because thos people, some of whom where MY friends, where not soldiers where not on a battlefield, had ZERO warning...

They brought it to OUR doorsteps maybe soo....but now we will bring inside their house...

I dont feel sorry for myself...and of course people have witnessed worse....but does that make less then what it was?....did you lose friends that day?.....because i did.


Posted by Dupz on Mar-20-2003 08:06:

quote:
did you lose friends that day?.....because i did.


Sorry to hear about your loses Tiesto... it's a tragedy that shouldnt have happened, but at least their loss was heard. People around the globe have heard about this tragedy.. The world empathised with you, and your friends. But no one hears about how my family and friends died in Belgrade in 1999. They died in vein... along with many other innocents.

like i said, the war doesnt need to be taken past their doorsteps, and into their homes... because it was already there before 9-11.

You must understand Tiesto that war just brings along more death and destruction... which is exactly what we BOTH do not want, as we understand what it feels like.


Posted by Mental Exodus on Mar-20-2003 14:37:

Be Cool!

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
HAve you lived in the middeast during the Iran / IRaq war.... MILLIONS died then...


Are u sure it was MILLIONS?? meaning more than one million? DO u have any proof of this. Id be interested to see it.


Posted by Renegade on Mar-20-2003 14:38:

Tiesto14, your attitude is pathetic.

I never once denied the horrors of 9/11. Why are you offended because I feel that civilian deaths in Iraq are just as tragic?

2,800 people died in the WTC disasters. At least 100,000 (most estimates are two - times that size) will die in Iraq. That's the equivelent of 36 WTC disasters. Just because they aren't American citizens it doesn't mean they are some sub-human peoples that we can blow up just to make you feel better.

And for the record the soldiers pictured there were retreating from Kuwait. They were running away from the American military, yet were bombarded with missiles despite the fact that they posed absolutely no threat. It's goes against rules dictating proper conduct in warfare:

quote:
When it was determined that the civilian economy and the military were sufficiently destroyed, the U.S. ground forces moved into Kuwait and Iraq attacking disoriented disorganized, fleeing Iraqi forces wherever they could be found, killing thousands more and destroying any equipment found. The slaughter continued after the cease fire. For example, on March 2, 1991, U.S. 24th Division Forces engaged in a four-hour assault against Iraqis just west of Basra. More than 750 vehicles were destroyed, thousands were killed without U.S. casualties. A U.S. commander said, "We really waxed them." It was called a "Turkey Shoot."


http://www.deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm

(I suggest you all read that - Cheney and Bush Snr both found guilty of war crimes. Wonder if they plan to stand trial some day?)


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on Mar-20-2003 16:22:

It seems like tiesto is one of those gullable people that Bush managed to convince Saddam was responsible for 11.9. disaster. Just in case you didn't know, Saddam and Al Quaeda used to hate each other, and radical islamists were terrorizing Iraq as well.


Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 18:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
Tiesto14, your attitude is pathetic.

I never once denied the horrors of 9/11. Why are you offended because I feel that civilian deaths in Iraq are just as tragic?

2,800 people died in the WTC disasters. At least 100,000 (most estimates are two - times that size) will die in Iraq. That's the equivelent of 36 WTC disasters. Just because they aren't American citizens it doesn't mean they are some sub-human peoples that we can blow up just to make you feel better.

And for the record the soldiers pictured there were retreating from Kuwait. They were running away from the American military, yet were bombarded with missiles despite the fact that they posed absolutely no threat. It's goes against rules dictating proper conduct in warfare:



http://www.deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm

(I suggest you all read that - Cheney and Bush Snr both found guilty of war crimes. Wonder if they plan to stand trial some day?)



Dude u posted pics of soldiers dead..not civilians...and i DO NOT CARE about soliders of theirs dying...fuck them...its war...people die.....


Posted by occrider on Mar-20-2003 18:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
And for the record the soldiers pictured there were retreating from Kuwait. They were running away from the American military, yet were bombarded with missiles despite the fact that they posed absolutely no threat. It's goes against rules dictating proper conduct in warfare:


Proper conduct in warfare (if there is such a thing) allows military action against troops in retreat. Look at every case of modern warfare in the past century and you will see that retreating troops have been attacked ranging from the battle of the bulge, to the kursk salient. Retreating is essentially an organized withdraw to regroup in order to fight again. Now if they were surrenduring that would be a different scenario ...


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.