Iraqi War Has Begun - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Iraqi War Has Begun
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by PeacefulWarrior on Mar-20-2003 03:03:

Iraqi War Has Begun

The war has started.

AP Story: Link

Live News Coverage: http://www.msnbc.com/m/lv/

Posted by PeacefulWarrior on Mar-20-2003 03:05:

Just said by Brokaw on MSNBC, saying we shouldn't damage the country too much "because we will own it in a few days."

So much for "liberation."

Posted by occrider on Mar-20-2003 03:25:

Brokaw is an idiot

Posted by occrider on Mar-20-2003 03:29:

Did brokaw just use someone with a bayonett chasing a guy around an orchestra pit as an analogy? The guy has lost his marbles.

Posted by PeacefulWarrior on Mar-20-2003 03:34:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Did brokaw just use someone with a bayonett chasing a guy around an orchestra pit as an analogy? The guy has lost his marbles.

Posted by LiquidX on Mar-20-2003 03:51:

That sounded bad, scary stuff, and its all just the beginning. Poor people in Iraq. I just heard that all the people in Iraq are so angry at Bush right now...

Posted by dEsidEL on Mar-20-2003 03:54:

"It HAS BEGUN!"

- Shang Tsung, Mortal Kombat: The Movie

heh .. i just can't believe the Americans are calling it "Operation Iraqi Freedom" ?!?

Posted by occrider on Mar-20-2003 04:03:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
"It HAS BEGUN!"

- Shang Tsung, Mortal Kombat: The Movie

heh .. i just can't believe the Americans are calling it "Operation Iraqi Freedom" ?!?

Yea I have to admit the military naming conventions are pretty retarded. Anyway it looks like tonight's strike was only a prelude of what's to come. Just a few missile strikes. All bets are off as to when the actual ground war will start.

Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 04:41:

quote:
Originally posted by LiquidX
I just heard that all the people in Iraq are so angry at Bush right now...

ooohhh really?...who did you hear this from?...your contacts in Iraq?

Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 04:42:

They attacked NOW because they seized an oppurtunity from intelligence from the CIA that top iraq military where gathering in one spot....WHICH goes to show you that we are not going for civilians...morons...we are striking strategicly

Posted by Vanilla on Mar-20-2003 04:45:

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14
They attacked NOW because they seized an oppurtunity from intelligence from the CIA that top iraq military where gathering in one spot....WHICH goes to show you that we are not going for civilians...morons...we are striking strategicly

but wouldnt it even make more sense strategicly to attack the weapons of mass destruction that the US has so much proof about, thereby eliminating the threat of Iraqi retaliation, and leaving Saddam little to no options?

Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 04:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Vanilla
but wouldnt it even make more sense strategicly to attack the weapons of mass destruction that the US has so much proof about, thereby eliminating the threat of Iraqi retaliation, and leaving Saddam little to no options?

yes it would...but in time my friend.....the CIA had good reason to suspect these leaders to be gathering...so they took the rare oppurtunity/....i think they US deserves some credit for that....

Posted by Yoepus on Mar-20-2003 04:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Vanilla
but wouldnt it even make more sense strategicly to attack the weapons of mass destruction that the US has so much proof about, thereby eliminating the threat of Iraqi retaliation, and leaving Saddam little to no options?

but if they did that then they wouldn't have any weapons of mass destruction left to prove that Iraq had them, now would they?

Posted by Cyrus King on Mar-20-2003 05:06:

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14
ooohhh really?...who did you hear this from?...your contacts in Iraq?

Your such a fucking idiot.

Do you actually think the Iraqi people are happy that for the second time in less than two decades they will see the very bombs that they once saw blow their people apart.

You dont have to know someone in Iraq to understand the anti-american sentiment that these people feel about your government. And they are not alone in this world!

Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 05:15:

Posted by Cyrus King on Mar-20-2003 05:17:

but you were implying that.

Posted by JM on Mar-20-2003 06:01:

quote:
Originally posted by LiquidX

Poor people in Iraq. I just heard that all the people in Iraq are so angry at Bush right now...

yeah poor people of Iraq, that are scared that Saddam will use chemical weapons. How about the Kurds, running to the mountains, because they dont want the chance of dying by the means of gasses and chemicals - you know, the stuff saddam pulls on them every once in a while.

Angry at Bush? Reaaaaalllly?! Read below

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14

ooohhh really?...who did you hear this from?...your contacts in Iraq?

props!

whatever they call it, operation this, operation that - the goal is to rid saddam with minimal casualties,....

sometimes i really wonder about the stuff you say Cyrus_King....makes me wonder if you really believe what you type, or if you're just fucking with us.

>JM<

Posted by TuanAnh213 on Mar-20-2003 07:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
Your such a fucking idiot.

Do you actually think the Iraqi people are happy that for the second time in less than two decades they will see the very bombs that they once saw blow their people apart.

You dont have to know someone in Iraq to understand the anti-american sentiment that these people feel about your government. And they are not alone in this world!

the objective of the US Military is to eradicate the Iraqi regime...not its people..although assured there will be accidents as always (evident from afghanistan) that innocent Iraqis will be killed which is too bad and is something they have no control over but to be as careful as possible. i do have faith that there will be few innocent iraqi casualties.

We don't know whether the iraqi people are either angry or happy about the US taking out its government cuz we dont even live there. its obviously well documented of saddam's abuse of human rights and i don't think anybody would want to live under that government. i think the number of innocent civilians killed will determine the iraqi people's reaction and feeling toward this war

Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 07:45:

whatever....if bombing Iraq prevents another 9.11 then you know what...i am all for bombing them back to the stone age....call it sick or selfish i dont care.....its ALOT different when your life is at stake....and 90% of you Canadian and Aussies are not threatened...so piss off

Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on Mar-20-2003 10:10:

quote:

Originally posted by Yoepus
but if they did that then they wouldn't have any weapons of mass destruction left to prove that Iraq had them, now would they?

Well, if they hit a chemical storage facility, I'm sure a large cloud of chemicals would rise and make it obvious on what was inside.

quote:

Originally posted by tiesto14
whatever....if bombing Iraq prevents another 9.11 then you know what...i am all for bombing them back to the stone age....call it sick or selfish i dont care.....its ALOT different when your life is at stake....and 90% of you Canadian and Aussies are not threatened...so piss off

God you're such a dumbass. Iraq has nothing to do with 11.9. Iraqis and Al Quaeda used to hate each other prior to the American attack on Iraq.

Posted by LiquidX on Mar-20-2003 10:54:

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14
ooohhh really?...who did you hear this from?...your contacts in Iraq?

yeah

Posted by LiquidX on Mar-20-2003 10:56:

Posted by TranceEuphoria on Mar-20-2003 14:26:

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14
whatever....if bombing Iraq prevents another 9.11 then you know what...i am all for bombing them back to the stone age....call it sick or selfish i dont care.....its ALOT different when your life is at stake....and 90% of you Canadian and Aussies are not threatened...so piss off

Did you ever think about the fact, that in this war far more people
might die than on sept 11? Besides, people in Iraq are also threatened-
Are you still "for bombing them back to the stone age"? How can people be so ignorant.
War is and will never be a solution!

Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 18:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
but you were implying that.

REALLY?...where did i imply that in here?

Posted by tiesto14 on Mar-20-2003 18:14:

quote:
Originally posted by TranceEuphoria
Did you ever think about the fact, that in this war far more people
might die than on sept 11? Besides, people in Iraq are also threatened-
Are you still "for bombing them back to the stone age"? How can people be so ignorant.
War is and will never be a solution!

if bombing Iraq makes America safer and Hussein goes then bomb the hell out of them,...I DONT CARE...

An war is the solution in some cases...WW1/WW2

Pages (2): [1] 2 »