TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Paul van Dyk Adolph Hitler.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by freeflytim on Mar-25-2003 05:47:

Paul van Dyk Adolph Hitler.

I just surfed to PVD�s website and was welcomed with a �Stop the War� message.

WHAT THE FUCK?????


EVERYONE agrees that Saddam Hussein is a son of a bitch.

It is common knowledge that Saddam has ordered the murder of the Kurds -his �own people.�

It is common knowledge that Saddam has blasted SCUD missiles toward Israel.

It is common knowledge that Saddam supports the death of non Muslims.

Its is common knowledge that Saddam is a non elected leader.

Its is common knowledge that Saddam uses "human sheilds."

If it were really for Oil, why has the United Nations only allowed a small bit of oil to flow out of Iraq in the past 10 years? Only food for oil?

When Paul van Dyk says "Stop the War" he thinks Saddam is Cool.

Do YOU think Saddam is cool???

Saddam hates Isreal.

Saddam Hates Jews.

Do you think Saddam would allow a female Docter? Or even a female Taxi driver?

No.

Because Paul van Dyk wants to "Stop the war" he must agree with the destruction of Isreal and the death of non Muslims.



By this common knowledge, Paul van Dyk must be an anti Semite.

PvD Must think that Hitler is God.

Sorry I'md I pissed over this.


Posted by occrider on Mar-25-2003 05:49:

That's quite a chain of logical arguments you got there ... I'm not sure if you're reaching teh right conclusions though hehe.


Posted by klingklang77 on Mar-25-2003 05:50:

pvd just wants peace, hitler was not very peaceful.

i see you have taken the saddam is hitler stance....


Posted by King_Mack on Mar-25-2003 05:52:

Rasta

its his OPINION and he's entitled to that
now, i ask very nicely and stfu
dont reach dumb conclusions based on a person's opinion. He, himself, has done NOTHING directly to base any grain of truth to your anti semite comment.


Posted by malek on Mar-25-2003 05:52:

Re: Paul van Dyk likes Adolph Hitler.

quote:
Originally posted by freeflytim
EVERYONE agrees that Saddam Hussein is a son of a bitch.


Not everyone, the rest of your logic is bogus. Too much Fox news my friend. I'm not here to defend PVD ( I don't like him that much ) but as too link Saddam and Hitler... wow you're good


Posted by occrider on Mar-25-2003 05:52:

quote:
Originally posted by KLINGKLANG77
i see you have taken the saddam is hitler stance....


As opposed to him being a kind/loving man? He's not Hitler but he's probably the most stalinistic dictator around right now.


Posted by freeflytim on Mar-25-2003 06:03:

Yeah. whatever.


Posted by klingklang77 on Mar-25-2003 06:04:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
As opposed to him being a kind/loving man? He's not Hitler but he's probably the most stalinistic dictator around right now.


i did not say saddam was a kind/loving man...do not put words in my mouth.

saddam is no good i do agree with that, but this war is not the way to solve things.

right now i think there are a handful of other countries out there besides iraq that are under a stalinistic type of rule...


Posted by freeflytim on Mar-25-2003 06:07:

and You're solution??


Posted by occrider on Mar-25-2003 06:09:

quote:
Originally posted by KLINGKLANG77
i did not say saddam was a kind/loving man...do not put words in my mouth.

saddam is no good i do agree with that, but this war is not the way to solve things.

right now i think there are a handful of other countries out there besides iraq that are under a stalinistic type of rule...


Yes there are but Saddam would be the closest equivalent to a Hitler type dictator today. With the exception of maybe N. Korea. I wouldn't even regard N. Korea as a completely totalitarian regime.


Posted by mr. poopyhead on Mar-25-2003 06:10:

how do you equate pvd's opposition to war with his approval of saddam??

i don't like george bush (sorry, that's just my opinion.. and i'm only bringing it up to prove my point, not to start a debate here...) but i don't support killing him... does this mean that i in fact support bush?? no... it means there are other ways to remove him from office...

i'm sure pvd hates saddam as much as everyone else, but there are more civilized ways to dispose of him... but since war is already in progress, it seems like the best option to get rid of him now...

the point is: ANTI-WAR is not the same as PRO-SADDAM...


Posted by klingklang77 on Mar-25-2003 06:11:

quote:
Originally posted by freeflytim
and You're solution??


and yours???? there are many different ways, war is not the answer!

BTW- you're is you are.. your is posessive. i see now what i am dealing with.
i mean come on spelling, punctuation marks etc. i can deal with...
thus this argument is not worth dealing with. i see we have tiesto14 2 we are dealing with here.


Posted by occrider on Mar-25-2003 06:13:

quote:
Originally posted by KLINGKLANG77
and yours???? there are many different ways, war is not the answer!

BTW- you're is you are.. your is posessive. i see now what i am dealing with.
i mean come on spelling, punctuation marks etc. i can deal with...
thus this argument is not worth dealing with. i see we have tiesto14 2 we are dealing with here.


You can tell all that from one grammatical error? Btw, you missed a comma .


Posted by malek on Mar-25-2003 06:13:

"You are either with us, or against us!" - George "idiot" Bush.

The solution: Bomb PVD since he's a terrorist and German, how convienient!


Posted by mr. poopyhead on Mar-25-2003 06:18:

freeflytim: by your logic, america must've supported adolph hitler from 1939-1942 and changed their minds after pearl harbour....
obviously that's skewed logic...


Posted by occrider on Mar-25-2003 06:31:

quote:
Originally posted by mr. poopyhead
freeflytim: by your logic, america must've supported adolph hitler from 1939-1942 and changed their minds after pearl harbour....
obviously that's skewed logic...


Not quite, America must have supported Hitler in 1933-35, became opposed to him in 1936 during the beginning of aggression and appeasement, gone to war with Hitler in the 1939 invasion of Poland, sign a truce and disarmed hin in 1941, etc., etc., etc.


Posted by tranceaholic on Mar-25-2003 07:06:

i said it a million times already saving iraq makes about only 10% why the us gone to war..i know lot of people agree with me even pro war people...why dont people read the threads and the discussions we have.


Posted by fastmp3 on Mar-25-2003 07:14:

i hope Starf0x reads this thread and slaps the shit out of you


Posted by arturob on Mar-25-2003 07:18:

wtf. are you dense?


Posted by jdat on Mar-25-2003 07:20:

you're entitled to an opinion, but presenting the things in such a way is firstly wrong and secondly totally unfounded!

talk to pvd himself and then you'll understand why he doesn't want war


Posted by mr. poopyhead on Mar-25-2003 07:27:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Not quite, America must have supported Hitler in 1933-35, became opposed to him in 1936 during the beginning of aggression and appeasement, gone to war with Hitler in the 1939 invasion of Poland, sign a truce and disarmed him in 1941, etc., etc., etc.


huh? america didnt' join the war til 1942... meh... i think you somehow got my point about stupid logic, haha.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Mar-25-2003 07:29:

war is baaaaaaaaaaaaad

hehe.. sorry i just wanted to say that.. but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.. i personally think that the US has no business in iraq..since they havent even proved that the iraqis have chemical weapons yet.. and even if they do.. its a world issue .. not a US issue..

when people are against war .. they are against the unescessary killing of people.. war leads to more war.. history shows it.. why not try to find another solution?

I agree with PVD and for those who dont .. give him some respect and credibility for he has his own opinion just like you


Posted by occrider on Mar-25-2003 07:32:

quote:
Originally posted by mr. poopyhead
huh? america didnt' join the war til 1942... meh... i think you somehow got my point about stupid logic, haha.


Actually 1941. I'm just going along with your hitler analogy. To correctly reflect the war in Iraq the US would have had to have gone to war with hitler in 1936 ... then signed a truce agreement, etc. Whatever it's too confusing hehe.


Posted by JohnSmith on Mar-25-2003 07:35:

wow, this just reaffirms how AWESOME Paul Van Dyk really is.


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on Mar-25-2003 11:11:

Re: Paul van Dyk Adolph Hitler.

quote:
Originally posted by freeflytim
I just surfed to PVD�s website and was welcomed with a �Stop the War� message.

WHAT THE FUCK?????


EVERYONE agrees that Saddam Hussein is a son of a bitch.

It is common knowledge that Saddam has ordered the murder of the Kurds -his �own people.�

Kurds aren't his own people, they are rebels of different nationality.
quote:

It is common knowledge that Saddam has blasted SCUD missiles toward Israel.

That was 12 years ago.
quote:

It is common knowledge that Saddam supports the death of non Muslims.

That's not true. He is a dictator with expansionistic tendencies, but he doesn't hate non-muslims. Tarik Aziz, his minister is a christian.
quote:

Its is common knowledge that Saddam is a non elected leader.

So are many of the leaders of the countries the US supports.
quote:

Its is common knowledge that Saddam uses "human sheilds."

They have volunteered for that. Nobody forced them.
quote:

If it were really for Oil, why has the United Nations only allowed a small bit of oil to flow out of Iraq in the past 10 years? Only food for oil?

Because if Iraq was to export larger amounts of oil, it could buy new weapons.
quote:

When Paul van Dyk says "Stop the War" he thinks Saddam is Cool.

I'm pretty sure he doesn't.
quote:

Do YOU think Saddam is cool???

Hell yeah, I want to be like him someday!
quote:

Saddam hates Isreal.

Saddam Hates Jews.

So do most of the arab nations US is allied with.
quote:

Do you think Saddam would allow a female Docter? Or even a female Taxi driver?

Yes he would. As I said above, he's not an islamic fundamentalist, and women in Iraq do have normal jobs. If you consider religion and sexual discrimination, Iraq is one of the most liberal countries in the middle east.
quote:

Because Paul van Dyk wants to "Stop the war" he must agree with the destruction of Isreal and the death of non Muslims.



By this common knowledge, Paul van Dyk must be an anti Semite.

PvD Must think that Hitler is God.

Sorry I'md I pissed over this.


That's not the only logical conclusion.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.