There isn't. Imo a lower BPM doesn't fit the track.

Sorry, but this is one of my pet peeves. Why would you need a "dj friendly version" with "lower BPM"? Are you not creative enough as a DJ to fit it into your set, or are you too scared to throw the crowd a curve ball once in a while?

___________________
"Wenn du dich zum Untergrund zählst, reicht es nicht, es nur zu sagen. Du musst auch viel graben, um es zu werden."

I think he means longer when he says dj friendly.

awesome song - i too wish there was a longer version

___________________
movies

blog

it's time to party

quote:

Originally posted by physe I think he means longer when he says dj friendly.

Exactly. Why does every tune have to be streamlined to 130 BPM with a long mixing out-bridge at the end for DJs to drop it? Whatever happened to just playing good music?

___________________
"Wenn du dich zum Untergrund zählst, reicht es nicht, es nur zu sagen. Du musst auch viel graben, um es zu werden."

quote:

Originally posted by Sand Leaper Exactly. Why does every tune have to be streamlined to 130 BPM with a long mixing out-bridge at the end for DJs to drop it? Whatever happened to just playing good music?

While I agree with you, I will also say that I prefer longer songs even for listening - whether they have a long steady beat at the end for mixing or not. With short songs, by the time a track has time to build it's already over. Maybe it's just my preference though.

when I encounter this problem I just remix it myself?

You mean something like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2R5YYYwNw8

___________________

d&b session 20090519
My take on... (various mixes planned, updated when I can be arsed)