 |
|
|
|
 |
Jayx1
Prime Minister of TOTA
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Socialist People's Republic Of Canada
|
|
|
I dont agree with this move but the fact is that when there are only scraps to be served, the vicious claws come out on all sides. The music industry is in big trouble which has left everyone fighting for what amounts to bits of meat on a bone compared to the steaks that used to be served.
|
|
Feb-11-2008 16:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
Orko
Digital Hippie

Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by MarkT
the more you sell, the lower the %. Does it really make a financial difference to Madonna or U2 or whoever if they get 13% or 9%? not really. Does it make a difference to a relatively unknown artist? yeah, probably. |
So your idea is to penalize the very artists that actually keep the record labels alive? The return on investment is much higher for big artists because of their massive fan base. Sure giving more money to the small artists helps them, but it does nothing for a record label to stay alive. The margins on small artists are already so small.
Plus, by giving less money to the powerful, successful artists, it just gives them more incentive to go and start their own label, or find their on distribution platform (Radio Head, Prince...).
|
|
Feb-11-2008 20:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
8Wonders
Arnej

Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
Feb-11-2008 22:46
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:22.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|