|
It doesnt even matter if you start counting at the start of a measure, you just count how many beats happen in time limit of ten seconds.
Doing it yourself should give you an accurate enough reading, within 1 or 2 bpm of what a computer would give you.
Besides, what is the point of having extremely accurate bpm readings? As far as mixing goes, when you're looking through records, it will only tell you if its close in bpm to the current record, 1 or 2 off doesnt make any difference. Its either in the same ballpark or it isnt.
As far as actually mixing the records together goes. Having the same bpm doesnt mean they are matched, or not matched well at least. You would be surprised by the amount of leeway you can have within one bpm point. Either way you're going to have to do it by ear.
|