Interesting how there is no plane in any of the pictures I've seen about the pentagon attacks... is there any with the plane on it?

how are you going to explain the dead people who flew on the flight that hit the pentagon?

___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.

there weren't any dead people on that flight....because there was no plane which hit the pentagon. There is no was a building could survive a plane of that size, look wat happened to the WTC.

Pentagon probably had armored walls.

quote:

Originally posted by tranced_out there weren't any dead people on that flight....because there was no plane which hit the pentagon. There is no was a building could survive a plane of that size, look wat happened to the WTC.

so you're telling me that if i search for the names of those people you would still think they are made up, what if i gave you names of their family members? what about some social security numbers? all made up?

hehe not like im going to search for any of that but still maybe if they presented some of those examples i would accept their theory.

___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.

dude if u can give me the names of the family, sure why not. U mean to say that the a whole passenger plane disapearred after it hit a building. There could have been some debris.

I wonder how long it will take Tiesto14 to flame you for being unsensitive about american feelings.

who cares?

is there a plane there? well I cant see it, I cant see pieces, but I dont know where it went.

the conclussion I drew is that something else happened to the plane, and a bomb like first reported is what did this to the pentagon

___________________
Retired TA.

Not this one again...
Yes, there was a plane. Around the time it happened there was a video around where you could clearly see the plane going past the camera...

quote:

there weren't any dead people on that flight....because there was no plane which hit the pentagon. There is no was a building could survive a plane of that size, look wat happened to the WTC.

Jeez, dude... it's Pentagon, for heaven's sake!
Don't you think it's been built "a bit" stronger than any "normal" building???

___________________
Latest releases:
Endless Cycles [Capital Heaven]
The Charlatan [Morphosis]

This is the most ridiculious theory I have ever heard. I will counter it with other facts for you;

a) The plane crashed into a newly renovated peice of the pentagon - they are currently renovating the pentagon side by side. The side the plane crashed into was completely renovated!! New Armor walls, re-enforced concrete and ballistic windows - the works.

This also explains why there was so few casualties on the pentagon side - as the internal renovation were still underway and offices were nto fully staffed.

b) Radar has the airplane tracked, and it was recorded.

c) as for why there are no plane remains - are there any plane remains in the WTC? what happened to the wings? where did they go? - Does this mean a plane did not crash into the WTC towers? I could swear on my life they did. You recall - the plane only crashed into about 3 stories of the WTC yet it completely disintergrated - it was the fire that brought down the towers.

d) the plane is unaccounted for - and radar confirms its flight track - victims of that flight are missing.

e) why would there be a conspiracy?

f) the site claims no remains of a boeing could be found. Can they explain how a truck-bomb got passed Pentagon security, and why their is no evidence of the remains of a truck? It would have to be something to size of a tanker to create such damage and intense heat.

Just a few reasons to counter your argument.

Last edited by Yoepus on Jun-24-2002 at 21:49