well i've through an odyssey to make wy wmp9 play mp3 files alright,and now its done! hooray
anyway,heres the question:
WINDOWS MPLAYER 9 OR WINAMP 3!!
and give me no "i have w3 equalised and crap!"
personally i think im sliding in the mp9 side
Jan-28-2003 14:44
CygnusX
Ex-moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Neerpelt
I can't choose, because I don't like them.
I'm sticking with Winamp 2.81.
Jan-28-2003 15:00
tranceaddict991
psybass
Registered: May 2001
Location: maryland
yea they both suck i had em but winamp2.81 is the best
___________________
the first few minutes may be very disornating...remember to stay clam and focused...insticts could play a very important part here...so trust us..
Jan-28-2003 15:10
arj1o1
.
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Netherlands
wmp 8 works fine here verison 9 not tested wmp 8 is enough for me don't need better
and winamp 2.81 for mp3's
Winamp 3 eats up too much memory but the skin I have on it kicks ass which makes me use it something like 75 different colour choices
___________________
Image removed, is over max allowd file size - see your profile options for the advance sig editor - Wicked Neo
Jan-28-2003 15:49
b|p|3m
Mixed Euphoria
Registered: May 2002
Location: Italy
I use FreeAmp. I don't like winamp 3 ( too much memory usage for my poor computer ) and i never try Wmp 9.
Jan-28-2003 16:10
BeatFreak
og
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: United States of Atlanta
I use both Winamp 3 and WMP9 and they both work fine for me. I got WinXP, 2.0 Ghz P4, 786 MB RAM. Get the MMD3 skin for winamp3. The only complaint I have about winamp3 is the load up time when you first start it.
___________________
Jan-28-2003 23:56
AussieTrance
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne
Re: WMP 9 series vs. Winamp3
quote:
Originally posted by Dj DoomForce
well i've through an odyssey to make wy wmp9 play mp3 files alright,and now its done! hooray
anyway,heres the question:
WINDOWS MPLAYER 9 OR WINAMP 3!!
and give me no "i have w3 equalised and crap!"
personally i think im sliding in the mp9 side
They both suck - one has bugs, the other eats up resources, but both look really nice
Stick with the previous version of both
___________________
yep
Jan-29-2003 02:00
AmbiguousBliss
Ein großes Bier, bitte.
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brasil/Canada
I use both, but Winamp's my preferred choice. (2.81, of course.)
___________________
For fast acting relief, try s l o w i n g d o w n.
Jan-29-2003 02:06
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
And another vote for Winamp 2.81 from me...
___________________
1+1=10
Jan-29-2003 11:40
jon
Respect Mah Authoritah
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds
winamp3 was released to early and has a fair bit of sloppy coding in it, and i feal that windows media player does to much with to many features eating up memory, winamp 2.8x for me with the video pluggins installed!
___________________
Beware of killer hamsters and the random running dogs.
WMP 9 series vs. Winamp3
something like 75 different colour choices 
) and i never try Wmp 9.
