|
Not only I agree with d-miurge, but if the world population suddenly halved, it would hardly be a "reset": The Earth had 3 billion people in 1961. Even if just 1 billion survived, we'd just go back to the numbers we had in 1801. As a matter of fact, if 90% of all humans died, it would leave us with, what? 600 million people? That's the world population somewhere back in 1600~1700...
Hardly a "utopia"... or a good thing, for that matter.
edit: Oh, just one more thing... both the world population and the available resources are just poorly distributed, so there wouldn't be anything good about this catastrophe if resources kept being distributed unevenly.

Last edited by Lira on Nov-12-2007 at 21:13
|