Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Creating a Clear and Smooth distinction between Elements in Your Track
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Stevemarble
tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Creating a Clear and Smooth distinction between Elements in Your Track

Been listening to artists who create what I think are super high quality productions recently and reflecting upon what key traits they all share. Regardless of what you think about there actual songs, there are certain techniques that you can use to improve the quality of your productions.

But what separates the highest quality productions from the crowd?

One key things I've noticed is how they separate elements or particular sounds. For example, if you listen to anything produced by WIppenberg, Orjan Nilsen, or Deadmau5, you might notice that no frequencies conflict but also, that there's a distinction and smoothness separating each sound. If you don't know what I'm talking about listen to Finished Symphony by Deadmau5, Kidsos by Wippenberg, or La guitarra by Orjan.

The effect appears to be having the main/core/key element the most prominent which all other sounds building around it in a subtle but clear way.

How do you think they achieve this quality?

Of course production is an art that takes time to master but certain techniques can take you there faster. Recently I've started layering sounds, panning them, and rolling off high and low frequences (as well as low and hi cuts) to create more power and oommphhh but I've yet to be able to achieve the kind of clear and prominent clarity that these artists have.

Also, it appears that they use a lot of mono sounds that are panned and eqed to fit.

Do you know any other techniques for creating a clear separation between a higher frequency and lower sound?

More specifically, is there a filter or a way to create the same affect in logic where you can let one sound pass below and another sound pass above?

For example, say you've got a midbass and a pad (which has a higher frequency range). Is it possible to create a setup where a filter controls the lowpass on the midbass and the high pass on the pad in the same channel or at the same time?

I'm thinking this could create a much clearer distinction or smoothness between sounds than my current technique which involves running HP and LP filters on each sound in their own channel.

If you'd care to share the love and share your thoughts I'm sure the community would be much appreciative.

Cheers
Steve

Old Post May-30-2011 14:51  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Stevemarble Click here to Send Stevemarble a Private Message Add Stevemarble to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Morvan
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

It's mostly compression what you perceive as punchy and clear and non-conflicting (sidechain). I personally do not perceive it as clean, the compression makes it lack dynamics.

Old Post May-30-2011 16:14  Switzerland
Click Here to See the Profile for Morvan Click here to Send Morvan a Private Message Add Morvan to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Inner Sanctum
tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2011
Location:

Compression can smear a mix easier than it can define individual elements, if you're not careful. Getting a clear mix is actually simpler than it seems: just follow fundamental mixing guidelines. Pan parts with overlapping frequencies apart, use various amounts of reverb/delay to push parts back in the mix, minimize the number of different reverbs used in order to keep all parts in the same sonic space, and decide which part(s) will be the focus and which parts will support it (iow try not to have all parts competing for attention). Follow good EQing principles. Finally, minimize the number of parts - a classic newb mistake is to have far too many parts, rather than a few parts that are each interesting. That's where a solid knowledge of theory is helpful - a good working knowledge of harmony can help you make the most of each part.

Also, be careful with layering. It's too easy to consume too much space by layering too much.


___________________
I.S.

Old Post May-30-2011 18:34  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Inner Sanctum Click here to Send Inner Sanctum a Private Message Add Inner Sanctum to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
skyhunter
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2010
Location:

I've noticed changes of clarity in different parts of the song.

This isn't a super dramatic, but there is a lot of blur building up to the drop, and a lot of atmospheric elements.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev4CcUje9DY

Then when the drop hits, it strips down bare (you perverts) and is soloed on the bass and some background noises. Then is slowly adds the background elements back in with the pads and such.

I think the effect is that it spaces you out at first then the contrast hits you and BOOM! you share it on another social networking site.


___________________
Tranceport is the best album ever....

There is nothing wrong with being musically diverse.

My Soundcloud

Old Post May-30-2011 22:36  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for skyhunter Click here to Send skyhunter a Private Message Add skyhunter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

Fundamentally, it comes from sound selection. A set of really solid sounds which work extremely well together, then complementary sounds which fill in the gaps but don't impact on the core elements.

Yes, filtering/EQing away the parts of sounds that aren't required is very important, but only helps if the initial sounds already fit together well. You can end up making sounds too thin or bassy. They'll be separated, but the sounds will have lost a massive part of their character and the end result won't be what you're after.

Some lead sounds only have a very minimal amount of low end cut away, yet still sound great in a mix and don't get in the way of the bass/ mid bass area. Everything sounds full and rich and detailed. This only happens if the original sounds fit together well.

The best way to get better at this (in my experience) is to practice putting sounds together. Choose a stock chord progression/melody and put together ten (or a hundred) different sets of sounds based on that progression. Don't worry about creating songs or anything else, just focus on whether the bass feels right for the kick (or vice versa). Focus on whether the pad feels right for the bass foundation you've established. Whether the lead feels right relative to everything else.

Put together a whole bunch of mixes and you'll soon realise that you've spent too much time trying to EQ/filter/squish together sounds which don't quite belong together. If you put together a hundred sets of sounds, half may be absolute rubbish, twenty or thirty may be serviceable, ten or twenty may be decent, and five or ten should be better than anything you've done before.

Those five or ten mixes, and the process of getting to them, will teach you a lot about separation/clarity/solidity.

Old Post May-31-2011 00:16  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
TranceElevation
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Oct 2010
Location:

The first thing you're probably omiting is that those artists you listed create mainly progressive slow tempo tracks. For the genre they produce also, isn't really common to put a lot of elements.
Let me see them make some uplifting/epic tracks ala Onova or n2o. You'll realize their mixes are not that amazing actually.

Though I recon some tracks are particularly clean and professional sounding.
Put in the account hi end soundcard, gear, sounds...and you're almost there.

Anyway, if you wanna hear something really professional: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpGuBmmy2hw

Old Post May-31-2011 22:22 
Click Here to See the Profile for TranceElevation Click here to Send TranceElevation a Private Message Add TranceElevation to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Beatflux
Rising Star in training



Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Planet Alf

quote:
Originally posted by derail
Fundamentally, it comes from sound selection. A set of really solid sounds which work extremely well together, then complementary sounds which fill in the gaps but don't impact on the core elements.

Yes, filtering/EQing away the parts of sounds that aren't required is very important, but only helps if the initial sounds already fit together well. You can end up making sounds too thin or bassy. They'll be separated, but the sounds will have lost a massive part of their character and the end result won't be what you're after.

Some lead sounds only have a very minimal amount of low end cut away, yet still sound great in a mix and don't get in the way of the bass/ mid bass area. Everything sounds full and rich and detailed. This only happens if the original sounds fit together well.

The best way to get better at this (in my experience) is to practice putting sounds together. Choose a stock chord progression/melody and put together ten (or a hundred) different sets of sounds based on that progression. Don't worry about creating songs or anything else, just focus on whether the bass feels right for the kick (or vice versa). Focus on whether the pad feels right for the bass foundation you've established. Whether the lead feels right relative to everything else.

Put together a whole bunch of mixes and you'll soon realise that you've spent too much time trying to EQ/filter/squish together sounds which don't quite belong together. If you put together a hundred sets of sounds, half may be absolute rubbish, twenty or thirty may be serviceable, ten or twenty may be decent, and five or ten should be better than anything you've done before.

Those five or ten mixes, and the process of getting to them, will teach you a lot about separation/clarity/solidity.


+1 good point

Needs a youtube tut.


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
change your avatar for fucks sake.

Old Post Jun-01-2011 01:46  Trinidad and Tobago
Click Here to See the Profile for Beatflux Click here to Send Beatflux a Private Message Add Beatflux to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MegaMan
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto/Canada

quote:
Originally posted by Beatflux
+1 good point

Needs a youtube tut.


yes indeed, thats how i do it as well. Sometimes i go through hundreds of preset in 10 days just to find the right one to tweak. I guess its a very subjective process. I think theres a book called the art of mixing by david gibson. heres the link "http://www.amazon.com/Art-Mixing-Mix-Pro-Audio/dp/0918371171" . i would definatelly recommend it.


___________________
http://soundcloud.com/ctrl4

Old Post Jun-01-2011 02:24  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for MegaMan Click here to Send MegaMan a Private Message Add MegaMan to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
skyhunter
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2010
Location:

Yea I think sound choice has a lot to do with it.

Now adays when I pick sounds I ask myself, "but will it blend?"

:P


___________________
Tranceport is the best album ever....

There is nothing wrong with being musically diverse.

My Soundcloud

Old Post Jun-01-2011 02:26  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for skyhunter Click here to Send skyhunter a Private Message Add skyhunter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
madmuso
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Melbourne

High and Low pass filters definately play an important role in getting a good clean mix. I used to solo my sounds when applying low or high pass filters which wasnt doing me any favours. I find you get better and surprising results by having the entire track playing while you tweek a sounds low or high pass filter. It makes sense when you think about it, for example, if you want to see if two paint colours work together do you just look at one of the colours on their own? or is it easier and more affective to hold a swab of both colours next to each other to see if they work together?

I do this a lot when searching for sounds too. If I am searching for a lead sound and I have already played the part in, I let the song play (all parts playing) and just scroll through my available lead sounds, this way you get to hear how it will sit in the mix and usualy the right sound will be obvious and let your ears know in a second. If you select the correct sounds from the start, mixing will be easier.

Someone once explained it to me like this, audio is like sonic real estate, If you decide to build 5 houses on a very long street then you can afford to build 5 big houses and take up all the available space, but, if you decide to build 50 houses on that same street then the houses have to be smaller to fit in. The audio spectrum can be viewed in a similar way.

Hope this helps,

cheers

Old Post Jun-01-2011 07:09  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for madmuso Click here to Send madmuso a Private Message Add madmuso to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
sot
shure!



Registered: Sep 2000
Location: and why see

agreed

choice of sounds is key coupled with a room with proper monitors and acoustic treatment should ultimately help you find those sounds easier as it'll pretty much be a slap in the face if your going through sounds if one interferes with the other frequency wise


___________________



http://www.beatport.com/artist/Chris+Luzz

Luzzed Up? - With Special Guests - Every 3rd Thursday from 2-4 (EST)
Exclusively On: http://www.di.fm/progressive/


luzzBook


luzzCloud


Old Post Jun-01-2011 17:12  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for sot Click here to Send sot a Private Message Visit sot's homepage! Add sot to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Creating a Clear and Smooth distinction between Elements in Your Track
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackkaiserdisco ID! / tech house [2010] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHive - "Ultrasonic Sound" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!