Oh my baby. But it's really only good for drum loops. Or loops with rhythmic TRANSIENTS!!
As far as time-stretching? Any program will do it. But time stretching almost always sounds shoddy. Time stretching is a bit like pitch-correction. There are two ways to do it.
1. Creatively. OH FUCK PSY TRANCE = TIME STRETCHING AND WEIRDNESS WITH PITCH SHIFTING
2. Technically. The old saying of polishing a turd. You can have amazing results with fixing the tempo of a sample or a track if it's only SLIGHTLY off... or fixing the pitch of a vocal if it's only a semitone or a few centunes off...
But trying to say stretching something from 140 to 110 BPM. GAZUNGAH! Sounds like shit. Same with trying to fix a vocalist who is several semitones off, and is always fucking up notes.
In a way. I really hate the digital era... because I get vocalists at school who just say "OH can you fix that in like AutoTune?"
And I just want to say "Can you sing better? Oh you can't? Well auto-tune can't make your shit singing sound like Charollete Church"
Anyway. I digress. But I hope it was usefull. It's all about the small fixes that makes things sparkle.
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Stockholm & in my mind
quote:
Originally posted by No Left Turn
^^ word on the street is Hilary Duff / Lindsay Lohan / Paris Hilton are all great friends with Melodyne
I'd say autotune rather than melodyne (but I'm suspecting they might need both in order to sound even remotly on tune )
DJFreaq: You are right in your principle that you can't timestretch it to much without it being noticable. But with todays tools it can be done to a much bigger extent than before. With Live going from 140 -> 110 BPM or the other way around aint a problem, you have to go for a bigger gap to get that horrible result now
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by davedresden
i suggest getting the gabriel & dresden prog-a-minute. in 3 easy steps you too could change the face of dance music.
batteries not included.
- dave
Sep-27-2006 02:19
djthunderbird
welcometoESTonia
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Estonia, Tallinn
quote:
Originally posted by No Left Turn
cubase and ableton both do it (though i'd say ableton dois it better), and i'm sure most daw's do it, too.
haha are you crazy? Ableton's timestretching algorithms are worthless to my ears. They produce so severe artifacts that its not even funny
Cubase's advanced timestretch mode is the only plugin that I know of that is transparent upto +-20-30%
___________________
check out: dtb.planet.ee <-- A couple of my mix cd-s (Deep House & Progressive with a trancy touch
Sep-27-2006 20:12
synthfreak
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Athens
well cubase is fine for timestretch work but you need to have a tempo calculator as well...
cheers
Panos
___________________
Lead Follow or get out of the Way !!