 |
|
|
|
 |
dj chex
A monkey without a cause

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: denver co
|
|
|
Woah calm down... Like all speakers/headphones, give em a listen before spending big bucks. What i may like someone else may hate. Even though i really like the Matrix 1000, i still think Mackie srm-450s sound way better overall with the exception of bass extension. I personally use srm-450s on a weekly basis for PA/live music and to be honest, between the two for the use i would go for the mackie. However, their $1400 a pair and won't nearly have as much bass as the matrix setup. But for when im at home chillin and playing with my decks, i like the deep in your chest bass the matrix provide. For fun value the matrix provides better than the Mackies, for accuracy value thats good for pa the mackies are better imo (i have somewhat limited experience with the Matrix b/c i never used them personally at a gig and i never used them for live pa, however like i said, my friend absolutely luvs his over his jbl eons, and they've seen many mobile dj gigs, i just haven't had the chance to give them a side by side face off with the mackie srm-450s for pa use)
___________________
| quote: | Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
He who laughs last thinks slowest! |
|
|
Oct-12-2005 05:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sound O fTrance
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2004
Location:
|
|
|
Interesting topic...I myself am debating over a system under $1500...
Dj chex would you say that the SRM450's with an additional sub would definitely out beat the B52 setup?
I mean I have $800 to spend for the B-52. But if the SRM450's are THAT much clearer at $1400 for the pair... I’d rather save up and purchase them for their quality to benefit me in the long run, and add an additional sub for bass to complete it.
What would you suggest?
|
|
Oct-12-2005 06:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
dj chex
A monkey without a cause

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: denver co
|
|
|
I actually like both... It's hard to say. They both seem to work very well for their intended purposes. It's easy to say the Mackie setup with sub will be superior to the b52, however, for $800 it's hard to beat the b52. For the price of the mackies and a good sub, the price will be over double that of the matrix1000. Plus, i haven't heard the revised matrix 1000v2 yet. All i know is it's suppose to have a better horn, amp, and crossover, and if it's indeed improved overall, it must sound great, however, i really can't make any judgements on which sounds better without hearing the new version; but i'm sure b52 did a great job improving it.
___________________
| quote: | Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
He who laughs last thinks slowest! |
|
|
Oct-12-2005 06:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sound O fTrance
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2004
Location:
|
|
|
awsome thanks alot, I definitely have to give them both a listen and see whats up, this B52 has been getting alot of positive reviews.. and for $800 i'd rather get that and save the money for other gear.
There is also a B52 MATRIX 2000 .. you think this would be an over kill?
Complete system with speakers, subwoofer, amp and more
1200 watt 3-channel amp
Subwoofer power output: 600 watts @ 8 ohms
12´´ 2-way power output: 2 x 300 watts at 4 ohms
|
|
Oct-13-2005 04:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sound O fTrance
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2004
Location:
|
|
|
Just got back from guitar center, I listened to:
1) B52 Matrix 1000v2
2) B52 Matrix 2000
3) Mackie SRM450 (mono) << they only had one srm450 for demo
Well to begin, the 1000v2 is out of the picture.. because mainly the bass THUMP in the 2000 just knocks away the 1000.
But seriously, even listening to the SRM450 in mono, the clarity and strength of that speaker was ridiculous... I can only imagine two SRM450's going at it...
The 2000 had a shit load more bass and thump then the SRM450's... but the quality and high's was definitely much better on the Mackies (even listening to just ONE SRM450)...
So I would love to hear if SRM450 owners are happy with the speakers? Because I am now really looking to get a pair..
thanks in advance for any suggestions
|
|
Oct-23-2005 00:30
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|