|
| quote: | Originally posted by Demoted
Exactly what I was about to say, the effects on the 200 don't seem childish to me, they seem reaaaalllly good. I can't vouch for how they are on the 100s', but on the 200 they're legitimate effects which work well.
Overall you'd think that could be a reason, to compete with other entry level cdjs, but really the name Pioneer is suitable enough. That reason doesn't seem good enough to explain why they're entirely absent from the higher-end cdjs. A cdj 1000 mk3 with the built-in effects of the 200 would be leet. I use the jet and wah effects every now and then (enough to make me somewhat miss them if I got a 1000 and no longer had them). The zip effect is probably good for something, I just have no idea what. But the jet and wah effects sound amazing on the 200 and I can't emulate them with the effects on my mixer.
Methinks it was a marketing ploy to help bolster sales for the EFX 1000 |
I think maybe is that
I also love the effects on my CDJ-200
and when I play live there is always a 1000, I wish the 1000 had the same efects.
or myabe it could be the platter on the CDJ-800 and CDJ-1000, it's too big and Ithink mayeb that would feel weird when manipulating the fects from that big platter.
___________________
Here are my latest mixes:
Pepa - Pure Bliss (June 2007 Promo)
Pepa - Visual Thoughts (March 2007 Promo)
Pepa - Trippin' Again
Mash-ups:
Perasma Vs BT - Swing 2 Gravity (Pepa Live Mash-up)
I Trance You!
|