 |
|
|
|
 |
zapper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Bergen
|
|
|
I think everyone gradually develops his own style when it comes to EQ control, of course this is true for every aspect of DJing, not much is considered to be either correct or wrong.
Still, it would be nice to hear the opinions of some experienced DJs.
|
|
Mar-18-2002 11:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ-Kuza
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
|
|
I like to listen to both mixed in my headphones and set the eq the way I loke it. THen I"ll bring in the new track while lowering the old track. And depending on the traks lower certain levels. If the track I"m comming in with is really high hat bassed, then I"ll lower that untill the old track is gone, then I bring the high hats in like a storm as the record was ment to be played. If you don't set yourself up for only one style EQ mix in, then you can lay the same records to the same crowds and it will sound like a whole new mix.
|
|
Mar-18-2002 16:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lost
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Los Angeles/San Diego
|
|
|
i think it really depends on the two tracks being played. maybe i'll have one of my friends upload my demo cd so i can explain things better. but as someone pointed out the eq technique should vary in order to achieve a seamless mix. first of all i try to see what is going on with the record i'm bringing in. if it has a lot going on on the record then i'm more likely to cut the highs and lows and bring the record in and then fade in the highs and lows as it fits. but if there isn't a lot going on then i'll just bring the track up and usually fade the bass in. on a fade out it also depends on what's happening in the track you brought in and the structure of the record. for examples when mixing from way out west-intensify (peace division remix) to kelly d-tribalism (tribal drum warfare attack mix) it was rather sticky going from standard prog house bass to tribal bass which has a lot of sub-bass. so for that transition i brought in kelly d with just the mids running then dropped the highs and waited for this swell on the kelly d record to completely swap the basses of the two records. this left kelly d running with the vocal refrain of intensify over it. it sounded pretty good imo. also another quality mix imo was going from fsol-papua new guinea (satoshi tomiie main path) to lovesky-drums 4 better daze (16C+ rmx). there i had everything on lovesky running as i would play it. then i waited til the second break of fsol and when the break ended there was this slight pause and i just threw lovesky into the track and it flowed pretty well. i was at the ferry corsten show and swedish egil mixed it the same way (fsol into ??? not lovesky) so i was quite pleased with myself. anyways the point of this long post is that there is no standard but you just have to call it as it comes. hope this helps in some fashion or another.
lost
___________________
"This book is dedicated, with love, to Bobby who found the only pound of pure - Faith in a Loving God." Hubert Selby, Jr. dedication to the latest edition of Requiem for a Dream
|
|
Mar-18-2002 16:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:10.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|