|
Actually mate, I have always enjoyed reading your posts, because I can tell that you are an educated football fanatic. I give you full respect there, and trust, I know all about Newton Heath and the change to 'United'. Though it doesn't matter in one sense, I certainly understand your admonishment of M.U. on the other.
That issue aside though, the riched of Manchester United have been well earned, and may I once again point out that the core of that team is British and has been brought up through the system. Rivalries aside, when you take Arsenal and Manchester United, you can't honestly tell me you respect the Arse more. Can we at least agree that they have purchased their entire team? Manchester has to get some respect for bringing Wes Brown, John O'Shea, Gary Neveille, Phil Neville, Paul Scholes, Nicky Butt, Ryan Giggs, and David Beckham all the way up from schoolboys. Give credit where credit is due. Anyway, the championship will be an interesting one to be sure. I know that football is increasingly a game of high finance, but living over here mate, I have learned all about that.
Baseball is a shite sport, yes. But you have the New York Yankees estimated at approvx. 825 million U.S. dollars competing with teams like the Montreal Expos who were are owned by the other major league teams by way of financial collapse. They can't compete, plain and simple. But everyone loves the Yankees right? The disparity gets waayyyyy worse over here. Let me put it this way. A-Rod from Texas Rangers signed a monstrous deal....I believe he earns more than the payroll budget of severl Major League teams. Economic Parity in sports is not to be.....but I believe that Machester United could be like Real Madrid and buy all the players.....Raul is their only notable local product.....at least Manchester have some principles and integrity when it comes to the matter. People will always be haters to those who support a huge team. That is the reason so many on this continent hated Jordan and the Bulls. There will always be bandwagon jumpers. I have liked United for years, though at the age of 24 you do the math) I really could not have been a fan during the woeful 80's of 'Scousedom. Let's just say that I know the history of the club, and I followed them (though to be fair, cable only started carrying football at any rate of mention after Cantona left). All I can say is that I like them in and around 1993, but that an element of my family hails from Salford.....and I have stuck with them even when they have had off years. At the end of the day, as a fan, you have only to answer to yourself. If you start following a sport, pick a team and stick with them faithfully, I see no reason to hate on others. I DO realize though, that people follow the best teams so that they can be on the side of the winner. This is a pitty, and that hallmark of the casual sports enthusiast. Along with the evolution of modern sport to become high corporate games, we must acknowledge that added element of the casual (AND FICKLE) team followers.
Your thoughts?
Cheers mate,
Gregory
Last edited by BalearicGreg on Apr-14-2003 at 00:14
|