|
| quote: | Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
If all what he said was true, than there is enough evidence. But, the problem is that his claims aren't proved. Those phone calls are incriminating, but since it is just an exchange of few sentences, it is hard to know if it hasn't been taken out of context. Also, a question exists of whether those voice tapes are authentic. The sattelite photos looked like they were taken with 50 year old satelites, and they don't prove anything. Yes, there was a warehouse, and yes it has been demolished one month later. So what. A building few blocks away from me has been demolished a few days ago, so it doesn't mean it was full of chemical weapons. The story about mobile laboratories is an interesting one, however it is not proven either. I somehow feel that the amount of evidence US presented is far below their capabilities. If the US really wants to prove its case, it should tell weapons inspectors of the current whereabouts of those trucks or the suspicious factories. It shouldn't be very hard to do considering the amount of satelites and spy planes the US has. |
I agree with you all the way. Presenting proof is one thing, but it being legitimate proof is another thing. I don't think the UN is going to allow the USA to attack Iraq.
___________________
|