|
paranoik0 -
I just bought a Behringer djx700 for $200 USD, because I agree with dartman in that it's nicer to be able to flip a switch at the front of the mixer that let's you decide which channels are controlled by the crossfader instead of having to flip a channel at the back. You might accidentally select the wrong input (like, turntable instead of cd player) or something.
Basically, having a 4 channe mixer is a bit more convenient =)
I recommend this mixer as a low budget, entry level mixer to anyone.
| quote: | Originally posted by dartman
dont feel dumb, it was a good question. personally i would rather have a 4 channel mixer just so that i wouldnt have to worry about switching anything around in the middle of a set. i have enuff to worry about picking songs to play and beat matching / mixing them. two and three channel mixers are a bit cheaper than four channels for the most part but you can find some good deals on four channel models (i.e. djx 700)... as for the features..... all you really need is some eqs and gains, split cue is nice (from what i hear). stuff like effects and samplers etc. arent absolutely essential but once you get good at mixing they are nice to have. the mixer i have been useing for about two years (numark dm-1285) has no eqs or gains or split, and i have managed to learn how to mix. i am ready to give it away once i replace it but its served me well
oh yeah, a four channel mixer can handle set ups like three turntables two or three cd decks and an effects unit, |
___________________
Myon & Shane 54, A&B, Armin, Thomas Datt, My Vinyl collection ^___^V
|