 |
|
|
|
 |
JLPhoenix
tranceaddict in training

Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
|
|
|
Sep-08-2003 22:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
AZCA
A.Y.U

Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Planet Earth, Trance Mainland
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Lac
Rofl maybe your overclocking it without a cooler.. and may I suggest you update them to 3.7 or maybe get the omega drivers.. And remember ati is just starting to get it compatible with linux and mac.. since nvidia tried to take over.
If you want performance just get Ati
yujie will explain heheh..
Well actually John Carmack from Doom can explain he's having trouble making doom perform smoothly with nvidia ahhah.
I have not gotten any trouble with Ati and I built it myself. I was an nvidia user like you but I switched to Ati for best performance. And no it doesn not heat up and I have 3 fans inside even with one fan off it wouldn't make a difference. Maybe you stuck it in wrong. Or just like you said your room is boiling so of course its going to heat up.. you should read the prints on all computers "must keep at room temperature" |
BASICALLY, ATI ONLY WORKS WELL WITH 2 OPERATING SYSTEMS, THAT IS:
WINDOWS 2000
WINDOWS XP
AND ALL OTHER OS's are ignored, it does work in 98SE and ME, but extremely crapily, even with your 3.7 or Omega drivers, same shit.
NOW, ATI makes a lot of mobile graphics from 7500 and on, and they give 0 support on them, they simply don't give a fuck about the customers.
Now, their cards are unusable even in Windows 2000 Server or in Windows 2003 Server, simply no fucking support whatsoever.
Bottom line, with ATI you get stuck on 2 OS's, and the lack of any support for LINUX and most other Windows OSs makes this card in 99.9% useless.
Now about heating up, the 9700 Pro and 9800 Pro heat up like a mother******, and don't argue, these cards are super hot, esp if u play for straight 8 hours.
Taking everything in consideration, nVidia is competing very well.
|
|
Sep-09-2003 01:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ Lac
Trance veteran

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by AZCA
BASICALLY, ATI ONLY WORKS WELL WITH 2 OPERATING SYSTEMS, THAT IS:
WINDOWS 2000
WINDOWS XP
AND ALL OTHER OS's are ignored, it does work in 98SE and ME, but extremely crapily, even with your 3.7 or Omega drivers, same shit.
NOW, ATI makes a lot of mobile graphics from 7500 and on, and they give 0 support on them, they simply don't give a fuck about the customers.
Now, their cards are unusable even in Windows 2000 Server or in Windows 2003 Server, simply no fucking support whatsoever.
Bottom line, with ATI you get stuck on 2 OS's, and the lack of any support for LINUX and most other Windows OSs makes this card in 99.9% useless.
Now about heating up, the 9700 Pro and 9800 Pro heat up like a mother******, and don't argue, these cards are super hot, esp if u play for straight 8 hours.
Taking everything in consideration, nVidia is competing very well. |
you must got a dud card then ahahah I play more then you.. I beta test for atari and I stay like 14 hours at least a day..
And my friend has the sager laptop with the mobility and he doesn't have a problem.. wow aren't you in a pitch of luck. But anyways the drivers are great. One thing for sure, you need to research more on what you do then just stick it in and thinking it would work for that OS. Rome wasn't built in a day and neither will this. You need to start upgrading.. This is now not the past. Heck you think people would care if you have an old card? No.. Its whats now that matters to them. I have a Geforce 1 and I ask for help and what they say "Oh I'm sorry sir we don't support geforce anymore, but if you download the latest drivers it might able to fix it" Hah and thats what I did so basically I said to myself ok I guess time to get a new card.
But my final say to this is that if you want performance get ATI if you don't give a damn then just stick with what fits you. Thats basically what this thread is about. That ATI has better quality then Nvidia and that Nvidias Pixel Shader which is important for performance is slow as F*ck. Thats why Doom 3 is being pushed back to next year. Nvidia was always good at getting into people's heads.. heck I have to say their marketing is good. They are like macs with the G5s how insanely fast it would be. Makes people believe and buy it but underneath that its not pretty. Get my drift :P
___________________

HighCouncil
|
|
Sep-09-2003 02:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
yujie__
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by AZCA
BASICALLY, ATI ONLY WORKS WELL WITH 2 OPERATING SYSTEMS, THAT IS:
WINDOWS 2000
WINDOWS XP
AND ALL OTHER OS's are ignored, it does work in 98SE and ME, but extremely crapily, even with your 3.7 or Omega drivers, same shit.
NOW, ATI makes a lot of mobile graphics from 7500 and on, and they give 0 support on them, they simply don't give a fuck about the customers.
Now, their cards are unusable even in Windows 2000 Server or in Windows 2003 Server, simply no fucking support whatsoever.
Bottom line, with ATI you get stuck on 2 OS's, and the lack of any support for LINUX and most other Windows OSs makes this card in 99.9% useless.
Now about heating up, the 9700 Pro and 9800 Pro heat up like a mother******, and don't argue, these cards are super hot, esp if u play for straight 8 hours.
Taking everything in consideration, nVidia is competing very well. |
what have u been smoking or living under? nvidia shot itself in there foot many many times this year. they "cheat" on 3dmark03 not once, twice or thrice but 4 or 5 times. they denied they were cheating on lots of benchmarks. when futuremark found both companies were cheating ati admitted it and removed it while nvidia denied it an called it "optimization" and "bride" futuremark about there cheating. they even brag about 3dmark03 in there conference called even tho they dont believe in it that much . they linux because not many people game on them or just htem as much. its call supply and demand. you get to stuck on mostly 1 platform for nvidia too. thats where the money is for the big two.
ati have been in the mobile and server business alot longer than nvidia. there cards are much more optimize for laptops and faster than nvidias. even games with Nvidia logo's are perform much better than nvidias.
tomshardware is not as reliable as it was. he used standard benchmark that everyone useds and that are optimized easily by nvidia. in real games, nvidia loses more than 70% of them. go check out recent reviews on gamepc.com, beyond3d.com ( real programmers go chat in the forums, very techinical), hardocp. they show nvidia lossing in real games
radeons are not hot. they are cool and more mature than nvidias. my 9700np oc to 400/300 with no problem at all. much better buy than any FX card out there and back.
Last edited by yujie__ on Sep-09-2003 at 02:40
|
|
Sep-09-2003 02:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ Lac
Trance veteran

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
|
|
|
Sep-09-2003 02:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
yujie__
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
|
|
|
Sep-09-2003 02:49
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|