Originally posted by occrider
Caught this off of the smoking gun. It's a memo leaked to the press I guess. Rather interesting to see how he formulates policy.
THAT WAS COOL!!!!
wow thanks for putting that up.
I wish i was there to see the discussion he refers to this upcoming saturday or monday
___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.
Oct-23-2003 21:57
St_Andrew
I <3 NYC
Registered: May 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
And how secure is that source? didn't convince me, may be fake, may be true... =)
Oct-23-2003 22:02
Yoepus
Neo-condimist
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas
sounds like a typical lecture outline from one of my profs. for our discussion sessions.
Rummy is there still room to add your class?
Oct-23-2003 22:29
MrSquirrel
Auf Wiedersehen
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: In a Tree.
quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
And how secure is that source? didn't convince me, may be fake, may be true... =)
Rumsfeld has not denied the legitimacy of the memo, he has just been downplaying it's significance.
Thanks for the link occrider....I was wondering what the memo actually said versus what was being paraphrased in the media. I would guess the administration is supremely peeved at someone in uniform . I would guess the leak was someone fairly high up who is "safe" from their KGB style witch hunts which would mean they are a fairly highly ranking member of the general staff or one of their key underlings.
Good find as always Mr. o
MrS
___________________
Click the sig to see MrSquirrel -"Reality" is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.
Personally, all politics aside, I don't think that Rumsfeld did anything wrong with this memo. It appears that he's being a realist in trying to come to grips with reality of the Iraq situation and, in essence, is striving to come up with workable solutions to address those issues. It sucks that he's being lambasted for departing from the mentality of "everything is A-OK" but I guess he stepped on a few too many toes in the pentagon.
___________________
Retro ...
Oct-24-2003 05:36
Johan (DJ Irish)
dj bum
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Malmööööö!
quote:
Originally posted by occrider
A follow up story on the memo:
Personally, all politics aside, I don't think that Rumsfeld did anything wrong with this memo. It appears that he's being a realist in trying to come to grips with reality of the Iraq situation and, in essence, is striving to come up with workable solutions to address those issues. It sucks that he's being lambasted for departing from the mentality of "everything is A-OK" but I guess he stepped on a few too many toes in the pentagon.
Being a secretary of defense isn't it his job to raise questions and scrutinize current strategies every once in a while?
Personally, all politics aside, I don't think that Rumsfeld did anything wrong with this memo. It appears that he's being a realist in trying to come to grips with reality of the Iraq situation and, in essence, is striving to come up with workable solutions to address those issues. It sucks that he's being lambasted for departing from the mentality of "everything is A-OK" but I guess he stepped on a few too many toes in the pentagon.
While I do not support virtually any of Rumsfeld's policy decisions in the Pentagon, I do have more respect for him than most of the Bush cabinet outside of Powell because he always has been pretty blunt about what he thought and takes a no apologies approach to doing his job. The memo is pretty typical of what I would expect to find coming from an intelligent government official. While they may appear on the surface to be all content and happy they should be working to fix problems they see in the background.
I don't think there are more than a handful of people in DOD that would piss on Rumsfeld if he was on fire. He is on a crusade to privatize virtually all positions in the department and give them over to independent contractors.
MrS
___________________
Click the sig to see MrSquirrel -"Reality" is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.
Oct-24-2003 11:12
rizo
rizoholic
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: sf south bay
I heard and read about this... so why is Bush still saying we are winning the war
Oct-25-2003 00:14
Yoepus
Neo-condimist
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
I heard and read about this... so why is Bush still saying we are winning the war
2 reasons;
1. So we can win the war
2. So he can win the elections
Oct-25-2003 01:30
occrider
Traveladdict
Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
I heard and read about this... so why is Bush still saying we are winning the war
There is no war ... we are attempting to secure the peace of which we have not lost. The peace is proving more difficult than realised to secure, however, the majority of Iraqis support our presence there and it is far too early to make any kind of formative judgement of ongoing efforts as is. Proper decision of whether we have "won" or "lost" the peace will come when general elections are held. No need to be premature at this point.
___________________
Retro ...
Oct-25-2003 04:45
DR86
I <3 GW Basketball
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Neither Here Nor There {NYTA/DCTA}
looking at rumsfeld makes me cry...i'm gonna go cry now...
___________________
It has to start somewhere,
It has to start sometime,
What better place then here?
What better time than now? --Rage Against the Machine