 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
St_Andrew
I <3 NYC

Registered: May 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
okay, sure, these people perhaps will have a better future, but that future will not be tomorrow. it will take many years. perhaps as many years as it would have done until someone overthrowed saddam. they obviously have to much pride in themselves too let the US "liberate" them. also i'm doubtful if US will ever have the patience to finish this "project", and if they leave it halffinished they have created much more problems than they have solved.
but that's really not the main issue. the main issue is for what reasons you really went to war. it was a bunch of lies, really if you look at it, bush lied more than saddam in this war. don't say you did this to liberate iraq, cause that is 100% bullshit (if you can't convince me, you obviously can't convince the arabs either, and therefore it doesn't really matter it that is fact or not, people think like this, no need to argue about it really...)! you had other reasons. and that is what pissing off the arabs (which i can understand, i would be rather pissed of too in their situation). so, making them anger = more USA haters = more potential terrorists = bad decision to go to war in the first place.
one more problem is that you are really forcing your political system upon them. i think you wouldn't be too glad if europe or iraq or whatever invaded you and forced their political system upon you. or would you?
somewhat i can understand the argument that they will perhaps get a better future. but yeah, under the circumstances it just doesn't make any sense.
|
|
May-11-2004 17:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
Tell me if I'm wrong but isn't that the point he's trying to make? I.e. it's not all bad. I mean obviously things ain't great but I would say 20 years from now things will be better (tho it's gonna have a cost) than what they would have been. I know it's gay point to make but it s none the less true. A counter point would be what about a political solution, I would say that failed. |
Well yeah, it's obvious that Drudge is trying to make this point. But it seems more obvious that he's merely making the point as a distraction to the major crisis taking place throughout the rest of Iraq. I'm glad kids are smiling here. I'm glad the serviceman is showered with flowers.
Now, could we maybe find some WMD? Oh yeah, there aren't any.
Could we maybe find a way to curb the growing distress, anger and resentment the Iraqi people have towards us (according to the recent Iraqi polls last week)? Oh yeah, well, that's a tough one, esp. with these lovely torture images all over the place, and with hundreds more to go.
| quote: | | Besides who here can truely say that before the war you weren't for it? The reson I say that it is easy to be critical of the way it's been handled but any critisim must be tempered with the knowlage that it is a hell of a difficult problem. Obviously that doesn't mean there is no reson to critise but also there is no reson not to congratulate. The troops have done some amazing work there, and constantly distracting from that is folly. |
Of course, hindsight 20/20, I concede this argument slightly. But I supported the war on the premise that WMD was pointed at our heads, not because we were going to liberate the Iraqi people.
But as it stands, no WMD found, and we're hardly seen as liberators. With the recent Red Cross report coming out showing that we just arrested Iraqi people without any good reason, and that up to 90% of Iraqi detainees were arrested by mistake, it's becoming obvious that it's not just the image of us being "liberators" is incorrect - it may very well be the reality:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/iraq...ws-abuse11.html
| quote: | | Also is it not possible that rather than lying the inteligance was just wrong? |
How do you define a "lie"? If you define it as stretching the facts to fit the story and deliberately ignoring counter evidence to support your case, than I believe it should be called "lying". If you do not wish to define it that way - fine. But either way, it was misleading, and we went to war on false pretenses.
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|
|
May-11-2004 17:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|