BT - Flaming june 2004, is it just being re-released or is it remixed?

remixed by Mudblood, and i'm sure that's Michael Woods.

___________________

Snore. Just shows that artists lack the creativity to even make new melodies, nevermind revamping the formula itself. This is most likely a cashgrab, not an artistic endeavor.

yes i think one of the top 10 greatest songs ever should be left alone now

___________________

All the weekend rockstars in the toilets
Practicing their lines

This post is better than your post

agreed

___________________



Talvekoidik / Saafi Brothers / Murmur / Burial / Near The Parenthesis

i really hate when they remix old classics. they taking away the value of the track. I prefer them rather to repress than remix.

I like the Mudblood version actually

there had been another one around last year at the same time which was less than half as good

hasn't also blank & jones made a remix/version of bt's flaming june?

i know i heard this somewhere, can anyone confirm this?

___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

yeah, there is a track with the same title out...cant recon the typical flaming june melody though

Prefer Frozen February though... sexy looking white vinyl

___________________
"COLLAPSED OBJECT WHOSE GRAVITY IS SO STRONG THAT NOTHING, NOT EVEN LIGHT, CAN ESCAPE IT. AS A RESULT, THE OBJECT IS BLACK, AND IT IS A HOLE BECAUSE ANYTHING THAT FALLS IN CAN NEVER ESCAPE..."

As much as I hate remixes of old classics, this is actually a pretty good remix. It has a little more energy and more of a 'trancey' feel than the original. The thing that really irks me is artists who title the songs as if they made them themselves like

'Mudblood - Flaming June 2004' instead of
'BT - Flaming June (mudblood Remix)

I think they should just give respect to the original artist. also, whats with this growing trend of adding the year to a remixed song (i.e. 2004). It doesnt serve any true purpose that i can see; if you want to know what year a song was released, look on the back of the vinyl or on discogs or something. Seems like people are more interestedi n fame then putting out good music these days, but I guess i shouldnt expect anything else, as I would probably do the same. But to try to title a classic song as though you made it is sacrelige, IMO.

all that being said, again this is a good remix that is worth checking out if the original wasnt 'trancey' enough for you...


(edit: note to matt darey: Please dont remix gamemaster ever again)

Problem just is, if he made it that way, he couldnt have released it that easy