___________________
I gots some of them there songs I wrote, mmm hmmm that's right ---> www.TrevorKay.tk
We are the ones we've been waiting for
Dec-20-2003 19:38
keithos27
Perfecto For Clubs
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Atlanta
hahahaha... it's good, if you have a fast system... it's a resource hog. winamp 2.91 is still the best all around winamp to date, in my opinion. i like to use winamp and itunes (i have an ipod).
-keith
Dec-20-2003 20:10
moncster
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
*pstt*No. Winamp5 is not a resource hog. It's pretty much Winamp 2.X with support for the 3.0 features (thats why it isn't 4.0 but 2+3=5.0)
Dec-20-2003 20:38
sooper
Beat Slut
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto
Thanks guys! that helps a bit
Here's another random pic
anybody else?
___________________
I gots some of them there songs I wrote, mmm hmmm that's right ---> www.TrevorKay.tk
We are the ones we've been waiting for
Dec-20-2003 22:27
ThaDevil
Suspended User
Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago
Winamp 5 is the best winamp that was even released.
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: In the wrong place at the wrong time
quote:
Originally posted by moncster
*pstt*No. Winamp5 is not a resource hog. It's pretty much Winamp 2.X with support for the 3.0 features (thats why it isn't 4.0 but 2+3=5.0)
^^^^ Agreed. Although the load times suffer if you're using a pretty glitzy Winamp3 skin like MMD3 and the like. Besides that, It's only MARGINALLY more taxing on system resources as Winamp 2.91 was
___________________
Few of my all time favorites:
Benz & MD - Oneric
Madoka - Plataforma
Solid Globe - North Pole
Quivver - Space Maneuvers Part 3
Digital Witchcraft - Brindavan (Grayarea's Purge the Inventory Mix)
Dec-20-2003 22:44
Trazedict
[feed me prog]
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: chicago
i love the Echo skin only because it has the trasparent oscilliscope
which just makes me jizz all over myself
___________________
The time flies. The time flies feed on rotting clocks.
Dec-21-2003 00:26
mto
Hip-Hop
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: FL, USA
i still use 2.80 :P
___________________
I needed to believe in something
I need you to believe in something
Dec-21-2003 03:27
torontotrance
I hath returned
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto
another useless bug filled pos...way to go winamp!!!!!
i'll stick with 2.80
Dec-21-2003 06:37
keithos27
Perfecto For Clubs
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Atlanta
quote:
Originally posted by moncster
*pstt*No. Winamp5 is not a resource hog. It's pretty much Winamp 2.X with support for the 3.0 features (thats why it isn't 4.0 but 2+3=5.0)
uhhh.... yes it is... just compare the load times and the resources it uses... whatever... i can spare the resources... i'm just saying that it does use resources.... i dont give a crap, but it does.... just warning everyone out there... it's still damn good.
-keith
Dec-21-2003 08:48
BeatFreak
og
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: United States of Atlanta
Winamp 5 seemed great at first but then after a day it started doing weird things to my computer. First, the volume knob I use on my keyboard stopped working and then it started changing all the sound drivers. I had to update my driver just to get the sound working again. Then that little "volume control" icon in the taskbar went away and when I tried to open it from the start menu it said "Error: Mixer Device not available, etc." WTF? I did a system restore back one day just to get back to the way I had everythnig with Winamp 3.(thank God I set restore points automatically once a day, Thanks WinXP!) I think I'm going to wait for them to fix Winamp 5 up a little more before I install it again.
