 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0

Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Iran Quake vs. Cali. Quake
| quote: | Originally posted by Dopey
yes but in the US thousands dont die even after far worse earthquakes. |
Still, the point is that there are always good ways to spend money. The problem lies in finding the right balance. Besides, do you really think 9.7 billion $ is that much, considering that the GDP is around 460 billion $, with the annual growth rate of over 7%? It's a whooping 3.1%! Not to mention that it's a country of 70 million people. Now, if an average 5 floor building can house about 30 people, and the cost for such a building is about 2 million $, then those 9.7 billion $ would annually provide housing for a whooping 15 000 people! Now, to house all the 20% of people who work in the agricultural sector (14 million) with the 9.7 billion $ aid, it would take a mere 100 years!
| quote: | | my point is that third world countries that have ppl living in mud huts should focus more on being prepared for disasters and less on being equiped to deal with military threats. |
You can't completely ignore one branch of development in order to fully complement another one. If a country doesn't have much money, it sucks, but it still must balance various aspects of growth instead of throwing all its resources in the same basket. Besides, 3.1% is not that much to spend on an army.
| quote: | | especially in the last few years since nobody poses a threat to iran except the US, who would destroy the iranian army even if it spent ten times what it does now. it's unacceptable to have a nation that has such poor living conditions spend so much money on defense. |
Yes, really, there's no reason for concern, it's only the world's largest military power that's posing a threat. Besides, you overestimate the US military potential. It is already engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan, so its capacity is currently severely limited. Now, while Iran certainly could not win a war due to its military might, if they would manage to make such a war drag on for long enough, US would have to back down because of both internal and international pressure.
But US is certainly not the only threat to Iran. Infact, Iran is positioned in a currently most troublesome area of the Earth (maybe with the exception of subsaharan Africa). Let's see who some of the more interesting Iranian neighbours are. First, there is Iraq, an occupied country in a total mess. Nobody knows how the situation will unfold there. Secondly, there is Afghanistan, a poor country that could hardly be called a stable one. Infact it too only has US to thank for its integrity. Not to mention it's the biggest exporter of opium in the world. A little bit south is Pakistan, a nuclear power that has constant tensions with another nuclear power, India. They also funded the Taliban movement. Internally, things are not all flowery either. Amongst some minorities, there are the ever-present kurds, not to mention a chance of a civil uprising due to currently opressive theocracy. All things considered, Iran has a very good reason for a large military.
___________________
1+1=10
|
|
Dec-26-2003 16:04
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|