Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Is Aaanold doing the right thing in Cali?
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City
Is Aaanold doing the right thing in Cali?

Seems that the author of this piece makes a couple of rush to judgements on his conclusions, nevertheless it seems disturbing what Arnold is asking in his budget proposals. Should Californians be concerned?

Warning: Progressive writer and website (at least I confess it!):

[QUOTE]Arnold’s Attack on Working People and "Wal-Martization"
by Seth Sandronsky
www.dissidentvoice.org
December 22, 2003

California’s GOP Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has a plan to reduce the state’s budget deficit, estimated to be $38 billion through the next two years. He is cutting social spending for working people. This is a strategy that also helps big businesses such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc., set to expand its presence in Southern California.

There, 70,000 folks in the United Food and Commercial Workers union have been out on strike for the past 11 weeks. Their employers—Kroger-owned Ralphs and Albertsons, and Safeway-owned Vons—are using the threat of Wal-Mart’s plan to add 40 Supercenters (grocery/retail stores) over the next four years to try and cut union members’ earnings and health care benefits.

The average hourly pay is $8.23 for a Wal-Mart worker versus $10.35 for a unionized grocery worker, according to a Dec. 19 “NOW” report with Bill Moyers on PBS TV.

Competition from Wal-Mart puts downward pressure on union wages. Call it “Wal-Martization.” Gov. Schwarzenegger’s budget-cutting also weakens working people.

Soon after taking office, he repealed the car tax increase. That added $4 billion to the deficit. One result is that Wall St. bond rating agencies are becoming less pleased with the state’s rising debt load.

Then the other shoe dropped. On Dec. 18, the governor announced that he will cut $150 million from the current budget due to the fiscal crisis he helped to worsen. The film star turned politician who promised “action” if elected in a recall vote is planning to go around the Democrat-controlled Legislature and reduce spending for social programs.

Presumably, drastic times call for drastic deeds such as slashing funds to house migrant farm workers. Also on the budget-chopping block are the California State University and University of California systems. For example, UC's Institute for Labor and Employment will lose $2 million.

The ILE has “been the intellectual driving force behind the burgeoning labor movement in California,” The Sacramento Bee reported on Dec. 20. Without saying so, the governor is seeking to undermine this movement.

“In 1999 when the Service Employees International Union succeeded in organizing 74,000 home care workers in Los Angeles County, the outcome was heralded as one of the most significant organizing victories since the breakthrough at Flint, Michigan, in 1937 for the United Auto Workers,” wrote Peter Olney of the ILE. “SEIU joined with community and political allies to restructure the independent provider system to provide higher wages and benefits for workers through the establishment of a public authority county by county in California,” he added. Then last summer, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, helped over 6,000 of the state’s home care workers to win union recognition.

The state’s labor renaissance has meant victories like this for low-paid workers, many of whom are female and nonwhite. This is hardly the cup of tea for the state GOP and its wealthy backers who bankrolled the gubernatorial recall campaign that helped unseat Democrat Gov. Gray Davis.

Crucially, cutting government spending for higher education will force more adults to enter the work force. Overall, this will help to calm Californians’ push for higher wages. Many of them surely want a job regardless of the wage, given that job creation continues to be weak, though the recession that began in March 2001, has officially ended.

This Nov., the state’s unemployment rate was 6.4 percent versus 5.9 percent nationwide. Briefly, more people competing for fewer jobs is a dream deal for a big employer like Wal-Mart. Its high profits depend partly on paying low wages to a non-union work force.

That pressure is now extending to unionized grocery workers in Southern California. Crucially, Gov. Schwarzenegger is trying to change the political “facts on the ground” to empower the employing class by creating the conditions for increased exploitation of employees. So much for government stepping aside for the market to work its magic.

Significantly, the governor is using California’s budget deficit to drive down living and working standards in the state. He has blamed Democrats for turning the state budget surplus into a deficit. But this just confuses the issue.

The budget deficit in California is part of a U.S. downturn. It is largely a result of the stock market bubble of the late 1990s that burst and reduced tax revenues to states. Like all busts after such booms, both were unplanned.

What was planned before, during and after the recent financial bubble? The privileged few have been seeking to roll back New Deal and Great Society legislation. Such legislation strengthens working people mainly by providing them with a safety net from the market.

Briefly, the goal of the rich and corporate America has been and is to restore the rate of profit that dipped with the war in Vietnam. That is what has spawned the past 30 years of economic restructuring in which unions in particular and working people in general have been attacked by employers and their political allies. Gov. Schwarzenegger’s policy of reducing government spending for working people is a part of this trend.

A bumper sticker in his gubernatorial recall bid read “Join Arnold.”

Currently in office, he is attacking working people, including some who perhaps joined him with their votes. But the situation now isn’t a Hollywood movie, and much hangs in the balance for many.

Seth Sandronsky is a member of Peace Action and co-editor with Because People Matter, Sacramento’s progressive paper. He can be reached at: [email protected].

QUOTE]


___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Old Post Jan-06-2004 18:23  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MisterOpus1 Click here to Send MisterOpus1 a Private Message Add MisterOpus1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
rizo
rizoholic



Registered: Apr 2003
Location: sf south bay

the only good thing arnold has done has been trying to reduce prison spending to help out a bit. other than that his been shitty, where is all the overspending loopholes he said he would find? reducing the car registering fee didnt make things better, just made people feel better that they are saving a few dollars, yet dont know cities will have to cut down alot, especially in the fire and police dp areas. how the hell is borrowing more money, only for the future generation to pay it off, going to fix our budget? gray davis could of done that, and even recommended it but got turned down. i guess its okay with most people since the average credit card is so much in debt or just dont care about the furture/their kids or really give into bush being a role model

Old Post Jan-06-2004 21:00 
Click Here to See the Profile for rizo Click here to Send rizo a Private Message Add rizo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Tranc3
tranceaddict in training



Registered: May 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, US

In California it's a fairly well-known fact that the public school system is severely underfunded, especially the U.C. system. In a time when rates have gone up across all public institutions of higher learning in California, Ah-nold decides to cut back on spending with the U.C. system. He said something along the lines of the system not needing any more money. Public health care is also getting a drastic funding cut, esp. in programs dealing with the working lower-class.

Old Post Jan-09-2004 07:47 
Click Here to See the Profile for Tranc3 Click here to Send Tranc3 a Private Message Add Tranc3 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
smokeape
Lowland Trance Addict



Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Heart of Dixie

Yeah, the people that voted for him probably all knew he'd be a lousy Gov, but didn't care.
I'd still like to see him do another movie with Jesse the Body and the cast from Predator.


{{{smoke}}}

Old Post Jan-10-2004 23:34 
Click Here to See the Profile for smokeape Click here to Send smokeape a Private Message Add smokeape to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Is Aaanold doing the right thing in Cali?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackSo familiar... but I forget. [2008] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackDenzil & Dewayne - "Force of Habit" (Vincent De Moor Mix) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 21:46.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!