embedding videos in html documents

Become a part of the TranceAddict community!

Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven't

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Chill Out Room > Archiving webpages

Last Thread Next Thread

Author

Thread

trancendental
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Somewhere between heaven and hell

Archiving webpages

Hey for those experts out there I was wondering which one is best for archving. What's the difference between saving a webpage on *HTML only file and *MHT file. I'm curious to the advantages of each. I tend to save alot of pertinent wepages of my intersts. I know they won't be around in a year or so.

So I appreciated your feedback.

Last edited by trancendental on Feb-24-2004 at 06:28

Feb-24-2004 06:20 Canada

Click here to Send trancendental a Private Message

arctic
Teh Pwn

Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Australia

An MHT is essentially the whole paged rolled into the one file, whilst an HTML only is, well, HTML only. It won't include any images and so forth, just the HTML code which basically includes the text and formatting. A "Web Page, Complete" does the exact same thing as an MHT, aside from one major difference. it will save the HTML file, and a separate folder on top of that that includes any images, javascript files and so on.

___________________
Currently Whoring: