the book is better.

quote:

Originally posted by Shudder the book is better.

yeah the book is a decent Crichton novel.

quote:

the book iheard is much better but i don't read books anymore and i want to see the movement and images not the words.

maybe you should try it sometime. you obviously need some english instruction, plus how hard is it to read Crichton?

|

___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

fuck u ahole

-shudder-


read a book!

which is the worst of the 2 cutdowns?


if a movie has Paul Walker innit it shouldnt be watched. hes a poor-man's bad actor|

___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

as a few people have said, the book is better, by far.

all books are always better than movies. movies have limits. books let your imagination fill in the blanks (how people look, etc.) which makes the books better per each own's mind.

movies turned into books suck

the best book-made-movie, however, is jurassic park

the first one only though

is this the movie with paul walker? if so, thats the worst movie ive ever seen.. not sure what you're talking about.

i thought duplex was horrible so i am just going to assume that i won't like timeline... but maybe i will like it? such a gamble.

quote:

Originally posted by wienerschnitzel i thought duplex was horrible so i am just going to assume that i won't like timeline... but maybe i will like it? such a gamble.

unless the *cuteness* of paul walker will sway you, save yourself and all mankind. if anything only read the book. its reasonable and takes less time than the movie would feel like it took|

___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

book is better, always. i love films but the book is always better. and reading is more fun anyway

___________________

The movie is average.. The book is much better.

Most movies based on book are just worse than the book, like Dreamcatcher for example.