 |
|
|
|
 |
razzi
seņor tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: new york
|
|
|
May-09-2004 19:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
dan_Saviola
tranceaddict
Registered: May 2004
Location: london, england
|
|
|
is that because you have that mixer? anything else good about it ? or do u think i should save my money and go for the numark?
___________________
"charlton 'till i die"
|
|
May-09-2004 19:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
stupidisco
Suspended User
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: the oc bitch
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Nemesis44
The build quality in the A&H is far supperior to anything Numark have put together.
I may upset a few people by saying this but I have never seen or worked on a Numark mixer that I have liked. They just always feel far too gimicky for me.
The vestax you mentioned is probably in terms of what you get for your money the best value of the three. Not to mention the fact that it will be more than enough to use at home and parties etc. You get them is some clubs too.
The A&H Xone 32 is far to expensive for what you are getting in my opinion, and if you are going to spend that sort of money you might as well put a couple of hundred extra into a Pioneer DJM 600. It's what a lot of the name DJs are asking for when they play at a place. It's a very versatile mixer too.
Cheers
Nem |
apart from the shitty digital effects that are played out till kingdom come, the djm 500/600 cant even touch the xone 32 in terms of build quality, sound quality, and did i mention the xone 32 comes w/ straight analog filters w/ q knob?
djm 500 and 600 is a thing of the past..
___________________
|
|
May-09-2004 20:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
visje
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: The Hague, Netherlands
|
|
|
im actually really curious on how the new denon mixer compares to the pion DJM 600.
|
|
May-09-2004 21:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
dan_Saviola
tranceaddict
Registered: May 2004
Location: london, england
|
|
|
guys this is great stuff thanks for your opinions. i was afraid there would be a dispute on which to buy and it looks like its happened. so what is it that the xone32 actually does, barring sound quality, that makes it 500 pounds worth of product. on paper it actually seems that the numark (sorry to blaspheme nem*) dxm06 actually has MORE features than the other two combined altho this may be just a novices view. wow im confused! i have heard a few stories about pioneer mixers mainly bad reports though saying they are no where near worth the price. and at 650 pounds i would need to be a name dj to get the value from it surely. either way im on a gap year before uni and i wanna buy the mixer now to ensure i have something to last before i go uni and have no money!does the dxm06 look the best bet at only 200 pounds???
___________________
"charlton 'till i die"
|
|
May-09-2004 22:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
stupidisco
Suspended User
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: the oc bitch
|
|
|
this is a funny thread.
you get what u pay for.
digital effects are lame. id rather take clean subtle and fluid eq's and faders then some shitty digital effects that in no way make you a creative dj.
this is my advice, get the xone:32 and play around for a while, then if u REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY want a fx unit then look into the efx-500 or just wait for the new fx unit to come out.
___________________
|
|
May-09-2004 22:43
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:50.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|