 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by NeoPhono
I don't have any constructive arguments to add to the conversation, because I too believe our ability to ever conclusively proove that prallel universes exist is very small (the so-called multiverse). But I'm never going to say that they can't exist.
However, I will put forth an excellent program from Nova (on PBS). I'm a nerd and actually bought the series, but you can watch it for free here.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html
It's an excellent look at modern string theory, or Grand Unified Theory, if you will. Gotta love quality public programming. |
Can't say I read and listen to cosmology too thoroughly, though the info. fascinates the hell out of me. But a quick question- isin't the String Theory kinda on shaky grounds at present (i.e. little evidence supports it)?
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|
|
May-06-2004 20:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
NeoPhono
Übermensch

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: In Orbit
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by MisterOpus1
Can't say I read and listen to cosmology too thoroughly, though the info. fascinates the hell out of me. But a quick question- isin't the String Theory kinda on shaky grounds at present (i.e. little evidence supports it)? |
I'm by no means an expert in theoretical physics, but if I have a grasp of current trends, I wouldn't say that string theory is on shaky grounds, only that there is, as you said, little evidence to support it because it is so hard to test. The "strings" in string theory are ridiculously small on the order of 10^-35 meters in length (in the so called "Planck realm"). That being said, the hopes of being able to see these things are very slim. You may say, "how about how strings act on a macro level then, can't you show the existance of string theroy that way?" The problem is, string theory is used to describe on a micro level the things we see on a more tangible level, so you just have a loop of saying that things act the way they do because of string theory, even though you set about establishing string theory to explain how the macro environment works on a microscopic level. The only real progress I know of to prove the existance of string theory is in supersymmetry and particle accelerators. If you can show the pairing of a boson and fermion, which is at the heart of supersymmetry, a "subset" of string theory, you can begin to show the existance of strings themselves. The problem is no one has conclusively begun to show this pairing. Okay, hope that helps.
|
|
May-06-2004 21:46
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:56.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|