General football question: Should passive offside be abolished?
What's your opinion?
Many football experts think passive offside should be abolished because it's to complicated and is connected with to much work for the referees.
I find it SHOULDN'T be abolished because it's sensible to differentiate aktive and passive offside.
___________________
http://imageupload.com/out.php/i93407_maglang.jpg
Spring is when life's alive in everything.
Jun-30-2004 20:40
Floorfiller
Girl + Sweater = Hotness
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Illegal Pete's
i like football...but i must admit...i don't know what you're talking about.
can you explain what passive offsides is. because i know what offsides is, but i don't know what the difference is.
Jun-30-2004 21:33
marcooz
...
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Bydgoszcz, PL
i've voted to yes (edit: damn it should be no )
if sb's passive why should he break all action?
nonsense
Last edited by marcooz on Jul-01-2004 at 17:38
Jun-30-2004 21:53
Reactic
In Search of Sunrise
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: 50XXX (NRW/D)
quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
i like football...but i must admit...i don't know what you're talking about.
can you explain what passive offsides is. because i know what offsides is, but i don't know what the difference is.
maybe somebody else can explain it to you cos my english is to bad to explain such (complicated) rule, or you look for it in google or somewhere else.
___________________
http://imageupload.com/out.php/i93407_maglang.jpg
Spring is when life's alive in everything.
Jul-01-2004 17:15
marcooz
...
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Bydgoszcz, PL
passive offside: when some player is on offside but he don't participate in action... e.x. van Nisterlooij in the game with Czechs
Jul-01-2004 17:35
Floorfiller
Girl + Sweater = Hotness
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Illegal Pete's
i just realized that we're talking about european football hehehe...i get it now...its all coming to me...
Jul-01-2004 19:16
tribu
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
so he is offsides but is not the one passing or receiving?
Jul-01-2004 23:08
Floorfiller
Girl + Sweater = Hotness
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Illegal Pete's
quote:
Originally posted by tribu
so he is offsides but is not the one passing or receiving?
yes
Jul-02-2004 01:23
emander
Suspended User
Registered: May 2004
Location: Running Amok!
no
Jul-02-2004 01:26
marcooz
...
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Bydgoszcz, PL
quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
i just realized that we're talking about european football hehehe...i get it now...its all coming to me...
yep we are talking about soccer
Jul-02-2004 12:26
noikeee
dubstep convert
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: lost and wandering looking for directions.
it shouldn't be abolished, it's fine as it is. if you're not interfering with the play why should it be disallowed? it would punish the attacking side most of the times.
___________________
sempre contra a corrente do jogo
Jul-02-2004 20:27
Lira
Ancient BassAddict
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
Offside
Yes, we're talking about world football.
Offside is when a player is not allowed to continue his move because he's received the ball in a position beyond all defenders (so it's just him, the goal and, most times, the goal-keeper as well). In order to avoid players to stay in this position (which could make the game a bit boring).
I think the rule is alright the way it is.
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
)
