Ive only seen them both once and preferred the first. But i wasnt totally engrossed in the second when i watched it so wanna give it another watch

Definitely the second one, it had Robert DeNiro. The first one just got your feet wet, the second wraps everything up…. then unwrapped in the 3rd one.. which sucked.

quote:

Originally posted by kaz1_2ghz Definitely the second one, it had Robert DeNiro. The first one just got your feet wet, the second wraps everything up…. then unwrapped in the 3rd one.. which sucked.

yep I feel the same way.Their both great though.

Third was the best. Instead of trying to develop a bunch of characters, they focused only on Michael Corleone.

Oh but eh, out of those, the first one was better.

Part 1 for me but its a close one.

___________________
. . .. . .. . . . .. . .

am i the only one who got bored by the godfathers? i really didnt take to them, or the untouchables.

and im not an action only film, i like goodfellas', casino, heat, k-pax, so i like my slow films, but these, i just didnt like.

Difficult question, but I go for pt 2

___________________

Down-Under was da bomb

quote:

Originally posted by MaGiK54 Difficult question, but I go for pt 2

I dont like either of them