Nintendo Ds also reminds me back in the 80s when you got those pocket games like Donkey Kong and Mario and what not.. those really 1 bit games or something..





At least they thought of something from back in the days and made it modern.

___________________

HighCouncil

nintendo sucks.

not handhelds

___________________

HighCouncil

Looks amazing!

Hope it lives up to it's design

looks nice, i wish the screen was wider though

___________________
In the beginning there was Jack. And Jack had a groove. And from this groove came the groove of all grooves. And while one day viciously throwing down on his box Jack boldly declared "Let there be house!" And house music was born. I am the creator and this is my house and in my house there is only house music. But I am not so selfish because once you enter my house it then becomes our house and our house music and you see no one man owns house because house music is a universal language spoke and understood by all. You see, house is a feeling that no one can understand really unless you're deep into the vibe of house. House is an uncontrollable desire to jack your body and as I told you before this is our house and our house music. In every house you understand, there is a keeper and in this house the keeper is Jack.

SWEET!!
it runs Game boy advance games right
cause if it doesnt
im not buying it

I LIKE!!!!

___________________

Nintendo doesn't suck at all. they prove time and time again that they can make awesome games, no matter what system its for. but for some reason, no other company seems to make good games for nintendo hardware.

___________________
*can't imagine it feelin' much better...
i wish it would just last forever.
and so, to feel like that?
i'd pay any price just to get that back.*

You know if nintendo decides to drop everything.. that will be the last for classic games. Which will truly suck.. and probably the last of the best innovations of the "actual gaming market".

Sony and MS just follow the bandwagon... All they know is if the hardware is powerful then people will buy it cuz its cool and has great graphics. It's not "ALL ABOUT THE GRAPHICS" thats why nintendo would rather have more gameplay then graphics. I bet whoever played games made in flash or java that were fun those graphcis don't compare to the games out in the box, but you play it because its "FUN".

And all i can say Nintendo DS is the one that will revolutionize the whole gaming market. Who would have thunk, to make it touch screen using a stylus pen, and you can play old games/new games. Now tell me 120 companies developing for it is not enough for the filling? thats more companies then the support on the PSP.

It's because those companies see the potential of the system and not becuase its all powerful. Nintendo DS is a flexible system. PSP is not a flexible system. The only difference on the PSP from that of the failed counterparts from the past years are, the movies,mp3s ,the wi fi support, and ps2 like graphics. Thats practically it.. there is nothing new. If you said oh they have the UMD aka MD.. well game cube had that? Now does PSP have a 1 gig semiconductor that can be programmed more easily? NO! because they haven't thought of that.

Thats the reason why Nintendo is still around because they have the best innovators among any one in the gaming market. DS is an example of what nintendo's new console could become.

Nintendo is the only one that has built 7 systems and out of those 7 systems 2 were bad. I don't get it.. even if nintendo is still around people don't realize their potential. They are more experienced then Sony or MS. Even if they are not number one it doesn't make them suck. Heck I'd shake my hand to anyone who has dealt and survived among 6 companies since the 80s. Plus! a big handshake for surviving for the past 7 years on the big Sony, Sega, and MS systems.

See even if nintendo is 2nd or 3rd they will make games because they want other people to expand their ideas more.

Once they go that is it.. you won't have anymore Adventure games like Mario, or metroid, or zelda.. ya know.. there is no other system that will ever have the likes of those games. It's because it's all in the mind and the fantasy and dreams you create. Something to make other people dream on their own. You expand your horizon and gain more to yourself. You create your world where the rules are set to your liking. Thats where a good game resides on, to just think out of the ordinary and stop following other people. Ya know.. would you rather have every year a game that comes out to be a FPS game??? No I don't think anyone would.. you would get bored of it and want something new! Thats where nintendo tries to make others think beyond FPS, and graphics. It balances everything out.. heck even if you don't like the system.. don't say nintendo sucks.. because I know you bought an snes or a nes back in the day or a gameboy.

___________________

HighCouncil

quote:

Originally posted by DJ Lac You know if nintendo decides to drop everything.. that will be the last for classic games. Which will truly suck.. and probably the last of the best innovations of the "actual gaming market". Sony and MS just follow the bandwagon... All they know is if the hardware is powerful then people will buy it cuz its cool and has great graphics. It's not "ALL ABOUT THE GRAPHICS" thats why nintendo would rather have more gameplay then graphics. I bet whoever played games made in flash or java that were fun those graphcis don't compare to the games out in the box, but you play it because its "FUN". And all i can say Nintendo DS is the one that will revolutionize the whole gaming market. Who would have thunk, to make it touch screen using a stylus pen, and you can play old games/new games. Now tell me 120 companies developing for it is not enough for the filling? thats more companies then the support on the PSP. It's because those companies see the potential of the system and not becuase its all powerful. Nintendo DS is a flexible system. PSP is not a flexible system. The only difference on the PSP from that of the failed counterparts from the past years are, the movies,mp3s ,the wi fi support, and ps2 like graphics. Thats practically it.. there is nothing new. If you said oh they have the UMD aka MD.. well game cube had that? Now does PSP have a 1 gig semiconductor that can be programmed more easily? NO! because they haven't thought of that. Thats the reason why Nintendo is still around because they have the best innovators among any one in the gaming market. DS is an example of what nintendo's new console could become. Nintendo is the only one that has built 7 systems and out of those 7 systems 2 were bad. I don't get it.. even if nintendo is still around people don't realize their potential. They are more experienced then Sony or MS. Even if they are not number one it doesn't make them suck. Heck I'd shake my hand to anyone who has dealt and survived among 6 companies since the 80s. Plus! a big handshake for surviving for the past 7 years on the big Sony, Sega, and MS systems. See even if nintendo is 2nd or 3rd they will make games because they want other people to expand their ideas more. Once they go that is it.. you won't have anymore Adventure games like Mario, or metroid, or zelda.. ya know.. there is no other system that will ever have the likes of those games. It's because it's all in the mind and the fantasy and dreams you create. Something to make other people dream on their own. You expand your horizon and gain more to yourself. You create your world where the rules are set to your liking. Thats where a good game resides on, to just think out of the ordinary and stop following other people. Ya know.. would you rather have every year a game that comes out to be a FPS game??? No I don't think anyone would.. you would get bored of it and want something new! Thats where nintendo tries to make others think beyond FPS, and graphics. It balances everything out.. heck even if you don't like the system.. don't say nintendo sucks.. because I know you bought an snes or a nes back in the day or a gameboy.

*applause*
*remembers Zelda: Ocarina of Time*
*applauses again*

___________________

This should be interesting...

I cannot argue that Nintendo has had some of the most fun games around. They were on its older systems though. The N64, in my opinion, was an utter failure. A cartridge system? Are you insane? In no way shape or form did the slight increase in loading space compensate for the lack of space for a game on cartridge. And one game after another sucked more than the one before it on that system. The reason I originally bought the system was for Robotech: Crystal Dreams, which was promised to be released at about the same time the system was. Never showed up. Amongst other supposed great titles. And the cartridges were way more expensive than the other systems' CDs. And let's not start on their "Kiddy Friendly" rock headed philosophy for the system. Or the fact that barely allowed any third party developers to make games for the system. They have made massive improvements with thier GameCube, but i still think they are suffering from the blunder that was the N64.

Sony and MS had a better marketing plan, the cooperation of many a good developers (SquareSoft, anyone?) and flexibility of their platforms.

One or two great games, does not a great gaming platform make.

___________________
http://www.myspace.com/deejayghosh
www.OldNorskProductions.com
[email protected]
Old Norsk
FloorBangrs
Don't Panic! Productions
Live mixes @ www.DJGHOSH.com
Old Norsk Web Site: www.OldNorskProductions.com
signature edited, height exceeded