Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Is the MC-909 any good for trance production??
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
DJ ICE777
tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Zürich, Lufingen
Question Is the MC-909 any good for trance production??

I was wondering if the MC-909 groovebox was any good for trance production. i have read a lot about it and listened to some samples that were made by the groove box only. it sounds really nice and looks like a neat tool to have in your studio (if you have the money )

I was wondering if anybody at TA had a MC-909 and could tell me how much money they wasted, or how many songs they successfully created.

Thanks!! DJ ICE777

Old Post Jan-31-2005 18:50  Switzerland
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ ICE777 Click here to Send DJ ICE777 a Private Message Add DJ ICE777 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pho mo
tropical bliss



Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Darwin

Depends where you're at. I started out 2 years ago with a 505 groovebox, and it's the best fun in the world. Really easy to work with, lots of fat beats and the best thing is you can write trance in your lounge. I learnt alot about the basic structure + elements of trance in that time. I probably have about 12 songs from that year, all done on the 505. I love my MC-505!!

After a year of having fun with that, I started to realise the sound quality was never quite there (or even almost) - the reason? the 505 has reverb/delay per track but not eq, compression, phasing etc. etc. Professional trance has an awful lot of fx processing per-track and it's just not possible to get the same sound out of a single groovebox.

Now the 505 is relegated to the rainy-day synth when I just want to have fun, and as my only hardware synth source when I need an alternative to VSTi's. Cubase + VSTis were the way forward without a doubt. If you want to eventually have a hardware synth in your studio, then I'd buy a dedicated VA synth, not a groovebox.

Buy one, and enjoy! You'll love it! But in the end you'll only get a pro sound out of a fully-fledged software studio, or a massively expensive hardware one. Depends on where you want to end up!

Hope my little story helps


___________________

Monsoon - Astrosurf

Old Post Feb-01-2005 01:43  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pho mo Click here to Send pho mo a Private Message Visit pho mo's homepage! Add pho mo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
FrancoR
Tuomas Holopainen



Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Kitee, Finland

see Nu-Nrg they uses a MC-909 in yours live acts.
personally i dont know this machine

Old Post Feb-01-2005 03:27 
Click Here to See the Profile for FrancoR Click here to Send FrancoR a Private Message Add FrancoR to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DeZmA
Synth Addict



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Lalaland

quote:
Originally posted by pho mo
Depends where you're at. I started out 2 years ago with a 505 groovebox, and it's the best fun in the world. Really easy to work with, lots of fat beats and the best thing is you can write trance in your lounge. I learnt alot about the basic structure + elements of trance in that time. I probably have about 12 songs from that year, all done on the 505. I love my MC-505!!

After a year of having fun with that, I started to realise the sound quality was never quite there (or even almost) - the reason? the 505 has reverb/delay per track but not eq, compression, phasing etc. etc. Professional trance has an awful lot of fx processing per-track and it's just not possible to get the same sound out of a single groovebox.

Now the 505 is relegated to the rainy-day synth when I just want to have fun, and as my only hardware synth source when I need an alternative to VSTi's. Cubase + VSTis were the way forward without a doubt. If you want to eventually have a hardware synth in your studio, then I'd buy a dedicated VA synth, not a groovebox.

Buy one, and enjoy! You'll love it! But in the end you'll only get a pro sound out of a fully-fledged software studio, or a massively expensive hardware one. Depends on where you want to end up!

Hope my little story helps


straight on !!

you do have to realise the mc 909 has more efx tho and has 16 tracks to sequence. The 505 can make semi decent songs all by itself if you have even a bit skills, and I think the mc 909 can make really cool songs. If you ever think to go live, it's better to mute/unmute tracks than a mouse

Just remember it will never be wasted money, I sampled all the drums out of my mc (hi quality stuff !) and there is not one song I didn't use a sample of it, the classic instruments aren't that bad either. It sounds really good in the mix but for really pro leads you'll need a VA


___________________
www.dezma.be

Myspace: http://www.myspace.com/dezmamusic

Old Post Feb-01-2005 12:35  Belgium
Click Here to See the Profile for DeZmA Click here to Send DeZmA a Private Message Visit DeZmA's homepage! Add DeZmA to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Is the MC-909 any good for trance production??
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackAnother Favorite [2005] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackSvenson & Gielen - Unknown Pleasure (Dub Mix) [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 14:16.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!