 |
|
|
|
 |
djshtr
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: T dot / MI / NYC
|
|
|
Yes
Check out CDEx (google it).
Its free and uses a lame encoder. You can drag a directory of tracks onto the window and it will convert your VBR to a CBR rate of your choice... Thats what i had to do for my CDJ 200 as well...
|
|
Sep-26-2005 17:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
Doctor-No
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by djshtr
I would have to differ with that. I've never tried converting my mp3s to wav.. Think about it.. if there is signal loss in the mp3 (Which there invariably is due to the compression), then converting it to WAV is not going to make it magically regain the lost digital bits of data?
So a 128k horribly sounding mp3 should sound the exact same if converted to WAV... assuming that the Pioneer CDJ mp3 decoder is as good as your software in your computer software..
I play 320k mp3s on my CDJ from beatport and they sound as crisp and clean as any store-bought CD. 192kbps from audiojelly is a different story, however... |
Yeah i can't understand why anyone would want to convert mp3 back
to wav, just a waste of storage and time. It's not a zip file, once
you have compressed it, you can only compress it more.
|
|
Sep-27-2005 05:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
Briden
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Victoria
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by djshtr
I play 320k mp3s on my CDJ from beatport and they sound as crisp and clean as any store-bought CD. 192kbps from audiojelly is a different story, however... |
i have no problem with the 192 from audio jelly, haven't got any from beatport yet actually, i looked around and didn't see much psytrance, so i left. to tell the truth, i can't tell the difference between 192 and 320 from AJ, but then again, my ears are fookin blown!
i'm gonna go get one right now and take it on a big rig and compare. i have heard complaints of the treble being a little harsh and once asked to take it down a notch, it sounded fine to me, but i was outta the main speakers and only had one pretty quiet monitor.
that's the thing with digital, "crisp and clean" is exactly what it is, but it can be harsh.
so yeah, sorta hijacked that, but yeah, converting back up to wav is dumb (unless you are doing it so that you can burn a regular audio CD, and want to run it through a better converter than the one built into your CDburning program, which is probably what the above guy meant)
___________________
stereoshift.org - Unifying people through musical celebrations; generating a moving and inspirational synergy.
|
|
Sep-27-2005 07:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
Magnus
I'm getting old

Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
|
Sep-28-2005 03:53
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:22.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|