hi guys
i have a question
what's the best bitrate? 192kbps or VRB because right here i read this:
PSYCZ INFO PSYCZ INFO .¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯|::
::| ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ |::
::| |::
::| As time goes by, the world matures. PsyCZ has matured and the scene has |::
::| matured. PsyCZ started releasing in VBR over two years ago, and was met |::
::| with skepticism. As time went by, more and more realised that VBR is |::
::| superiour to cbr 192. Finally, in 2004, VBR is allowed by the scene. |::
::| PsyCZ will also in 2004 continue to bring you the finest psychedelic |::
::| trance music from around the world, as we have since 2001.
VBR best quality that 192kbps??
___________________
Trance
Oct-25-2005 18:37
skip
a.k.a. skip2
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else
this is stupid
this has nothing to do with filesharing
he just wants to know which is better
just cause you saw a release group name doesn't mean it can't be discussed...
i know it's looked down upon, but is TA turning into nazi germany?
if you see a huge wad of cash in my pocket does it mean i robbed a bank?
___________________
Summary of an ASOT episode:
- The newest tunes selected!!!! the hottest tracks in a row!!!! here is your host arrrrrmin van buuuuuuuuhreeennnnnhnnhhn
- hello and welcome glad u cud join us this is a state of trance episode blah blah blah
- waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaah whineeeeeeeeeeeee blah blaaaaaaaaah
- that was the newest track by blah bla and before that was blaaaaaaah
- waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....the end
Vomit-inducing trifecta tunage: Zocalo | Summer Dream | Shivers
Oct-25-2005 19:32
allcentury18
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2005
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by digitul punk
Yes 192 kbps VBR is better than 192 kbps CBR .. NOW delete this thread.kthxbye.
no its not... the whole point of a VBR is to keep quality when needed but retain similar size as a CBR of lesser quality
___________________
http://www.bash.org BASH DOT ORG WHORE All those who believe in Telekenesis raise my hand.
Oct-25-2005 20:12
NicholasR
tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Flushing, NY
Personally i dont think theres much of a difference in the quality. you have to be one picky mofo to complain about the quality at that rate. anything above 128 is fine to me
Yeah, if you look at most digital download sites on the net, they feature mostly 320/192 kbps CBR MP3s. The only site I know of that has the option for 192 kbps VBR MP4's is BeatPort, and i've listened to both and there is not a big difference really in sound quality. If there was a big difference, it would cost more, and really the only ones that they could feature that would be better are WAV or Flac files, and I guess Oog, Real Audio or WMA files sound slightly better. But really even those don't have that big of a difference. BeatPort is also the only site I know that offers WAVs, but it costs extra and you can't download them yet.
Oct-25-2005 21:06
Soeder
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
quote:
Originally posted by NicholasR
Personally i dont think theres much of a difference in the quality. you have to be one picky mofo to complain about the quality at that rate. anything above 128 is fine to me
Maybe on your lap-top speakers or walkman, but on a real stereo the difference appear!
___________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Oct-25-2005 21:39
NicholasR
tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Flushing, NY
quote:
Originally posted by Soeder
Maybe on your lap-top speakers or walkman, but on a real stereo the difference appear!
HaAH, Man. Im talking about on my Yamaha RX-V1200 with Infinity's. Trust me, I know what sound good and what doesnt. but when ur talking about anything above 160kbps it doesn't make much of a difference. unless we get into analog...
And yes, i get some bangin quality with this biatch.