|
yeah reading reviews about mixes vary alot. alot of good points are brought up in this thread so far, about how a reaction to a track can completely influence the 'quality' of the set, when in all honesty they are too different things.
also, i feel that the point of judging one's beatmatching is moot, because more than likely the dj knows when he's fucking up. however, i think its good to make comments about when tracks are dropped in, or how EQing/effects are used.
i think that when reviewing a set, its important to consider these aspects before actually commenting:
-flow of set (analyze the structure of the feel/tone of the set, regardless of genre)
-quality of track transitions (eqing/effects/placement/timing/beatmatching)
-track selection (this can be too subjective at times, refer more to the way that each track compliments each other)
there are other aspects, but i fel that those are the main three. if we get more objective/constructively critical reviews, the 'comment on my mix' threads/posts will be a more valuable addition to the dj booth.
razzi.
ps- and here is some more advertising for my radio show:
razzi's bi-weekly show 'the thirteenth hour'
on 89.3fm WNUR chicago.
check my sig for online streams.
nov 1, 9:30-11pm CST.
enjoy.
___________________
| Download LIVE WNUR 89.3fm Set | bio
|