|
| quote: | Originally posted by Derivative
this happens alot but if you let it get to you then thats a shame. a synth is like any instrument - it is only limited by the ability of the musician that is playing it. synths dont just sit well in the mix by default, nor is it the hallmark of a good synth. the virus is certainly no exception because, quite the opposite of the nord lead, it is difficult to get very bright sounds out of it - the raw waveforms have very little top end. thats not to say it isnt possible - it is (for instance, by using FM and tuning the 2nd oscillator up/saturating the filter pretty hard/using rectified or digital distortion/lots of filter resonance with the cutoff very high/using the 3 band EQ on the virus c/post processing/or a combination of some or all of the above). but it takes a little more effort and a little more thought. thats the work that you as a producer should do. if you fail to achieve this, it is not because of something inherantly wrong in the instrument. it is a failure on your part to make anything happen using that instrument.
my advice - try harder. try some things differently. if you spent this much time and money it would be a shame to see all of that go to waste. and maybe this will be reassuring, but most of us have been through periods where we just cannot build any sounds we seem to like. part of being a good producer and a good musician is trying to overcome these barriers. many people here would be ecstatic to own a nord lead. i can think of quite a few people around here who could really build some amazing things on it. having played on a nord lead 2x myself and having heard too many records to mention that have put this instrument to good use, you will have to excuse me for believing that you are flat out wrong.
just one question though. out of curiousity. why did you (at various points) decide to buy all the nord lead models? including both rack and keyboard versions? |
First of all, thanks for rational reply and not jumping out with flaming. I would agree with you that instrument is only limited by artist's imagination or lack thereof. However, some instruments have more or better presense than others. It all depends on application, right? I mean if I wanted to write a pure "death-metal" tune, I would not use a violin as an exclusive instrument to create it with.
I am sure you agree that on a basic level, every instrument has some sort of characteristic and certain limitations. Sure, they may be virtually endless but without examining each sound on a microscopic level, I am sure we can deduce that each synth has a particular sound and application where it excells.
Let's not throw away baby with bath water but at the same time I should clarify my statement. For my musical application, I found Nord synths dull. Perhaps for someone else this will be just the ticket. Sure, my initial comments were based on more of an emotional response to technology (heh! BT, eat your heart out!).
Hence my disapointment with Nord. It just failed to "wow" me.
To further prove my point about instrument and application, let's do a quick test. I name instrument, you think of association - e.g. what would you associate it with. My thoughts are included below.
Example: Electric Guitar - Rock
So, let's go:
Moog - Bass, leads
303 - Bass, acid lines
Jupiter 8 - "Rio" arp, spacey pads, lush basses
JP8080 - Supersaw
and....
Nord Lead - ......... er... mmm...
Sorry, can't really think of any example, perhaps short of "Solar Stone - 7th City", for "that guitar" sound (which, ironically got me interested in Nord in the first place).
Oh, and to answer your question about nords, why did I have all models at different times? Simple - trying out different ideas, to see what worked.
Started initially with Nord Lead 3 Kbd. Didn't like it too much - had no built in FX and I was a beginner then. Didn't really appreciate the flexibility of synth (vs. rompler). Returned to the store virtually the same day.
Then, I picked up a 2x - that one actually got me quite interested but filters were too cold and too harsh for my ears. So, on e-bay it went.
I then traded some obscure gear for original rack version of Nord - as it got rave reviews from trance producers. I had the 12voice version. I liked it but it was just sounded too damn thin in the mix and compared to my arsenal of Analogs - it just didn't stand out. So, I sold it.
Right after I sold it I had a great deal offered to me to pick up NL3 rack. Figuring it's been 3 years since I tried NL3 and now that I have a decent external FX unit - this could be the freshness I was looking for. Plus I was looking for some decent EP/Wurlie type sounds. Well, I was actually more impressed with NL1 than NL3 in that area.
so, that's the reason for my critique.
But positives are:
1. Styling
2. Pitchstick and Mod wheels
3. Size
4. NL3 design - to die for.
It is a cool instrument but I just have a love-hate relationship with it and it turned more towards dislike lately.
oh, and I am not a synth novice - I don't rely on patches for anything more than demo of synth range and capability.
I "roll my own" ;-).
___________________
| quote: | | No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don’t want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life’s change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true. |
--Steve Jobs (1955 - 2011)
|