 |
|
|
|
 |
IDarkISwordI
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Clay Center, USA
|
|
|
Nov-13-2005 00:30
|
|
|
 |
 |
FuzzyGreen
Music Addict

Registered: May 2001
Location: Bay Area, Ca USA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Pjotr G
well, personally, I'm against the act of attempting to clean up a sloppy mix with "mastering". Just get back in the mix until it sounds good! It's possible to create a mix that doesn't need mastering, which is always better.
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Shibby
He's right... a track that is perfectly written and mixed will need zero mastering.
If you did it all correctly and chose the right sounds and made it all work the way it should, then you don't need to do anything to master it. In fact, mastering may even ruin the song. |
You guys oviously aren't aware of what real mastering is if you believe that.
Yes, if you make a perfect mix (which is pretty much impossible and quite cocky for you to think that you are capable of doing) it will be perfect for your studio dynamics, your monitors, and equipment. But that is all it will be perfect for. Do you plan on having all your listeners come to your studio to hear your track?
Mastering makes your mix work on multiple other situations and formats and also will make your track louder so that it will equal levels of other songs. You don't want to have your song be the quietest track in a mix set and you also want to make sure that all parts of your track are heard evenly without one part being overbearing (something that may be impossible with just adjusting levels alone). Also Limiting can allow you to keep any nasty peaks from distorting. Expanders and sonic maximizers can give a more *full* effect which is impossible with mixing alone.
Exactly zero professional songs make it big without pro or semi pro mastering. I seriously doubt any big name DJ's would touch a track that hasn't been properly mastered.
If mastering ruins a track, the mastering was not done correctly.
|
|
Nov-13-2005 04:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
Limit
AKA:STEVE QUADRA
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: A State of Trance
|
|
|
all I hear is blah blah bullshit about if you do your mix right then you wont need mastering....who the hell do you think you are? Probably everysingle damn track out there needs mastering even if the mix is pretty damn good. So please don't consider yourself a master until proven worthy.
If any one of you can make a perfect mix that needs no mastering then your in luck because we just fired about 500 mastering engineers and replaced them with you!
|
|
Nov-13-2005 06:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ Shibby
Amphoteric Superbase

Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Of Earthzen and the Therethen
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Limit
all I hear is blah blah bullshit about if you do your mix right then you wont need mastering....who the hell do you think you are? Probably everysingle damn track out there needs mastering even if the mix is pretty damn good. So please don't consider yourself a master until proven worthy.
If any one of you can make a perfect mix that needs no mastering then your in luck because we just fired about 500 mastering engineers and replaced them with you! |
Whoa, whoa whoa...
I must have came across completely wrong here.
I was in fact describing a perfect and pretty much unattainable goal; it's the ideal. The thing you strive for in order to give yourself quality. The perfect mix.
I wasn't saying "AH HAH A I am DJ Shibby and my productions needs no mastering!!"
You're right about mastering for other mediums; but this is not something you do in your home studio with T-Racks. This is something that you let a professional do.
"Mastering" as far as a producer needs to achieve to give his song the most professional appeal towards a label... that's what we do.
Anyway, you guys are right... different media are mastered in specific ways (such as radio); as for your job as a producer, you can make an ideal mix that needs no mastering. It's possible.
Mixing and mastering for digital producers is usually something we do as we work; we add compression to our kickdrums, we duck certain instruments in certain places so that the others stand out, equalizing, we automate volumes and cutoffs, we place a limiter on there to stop clipping in the hot spots etc etc.
I'm just saying that when you get to the end of your process, you adding your waves L2 to make it louder shouldn't really change the song's sound too much. You should already be in a place where the song is solid, else the mastering plugs you use most likely won't make too much difference.
My personal advice is to ease up on EQ, compression, and limiting and focus on dynamics. That's what the master should be about : having a track that is both loud enough, and pumps properly.
Just tossing an L2 onto your track is *not* mastering. It's stuff that you should have done professionally if you get to that point.
Hey listen, I don't mean to come across as "I'm 100% right". The way you do things may be perfect for you; I'm just sharing what I've found to work well for myself. I'm also not meaning to blatantly disregard certain facts; like I said, you're right, Vinyl and digital MP3 need two different types of masters. If you know how to do that nicely, then that's awesome... share the knowledge.
Okay, peace.
|
|
Nov-13-2005 10:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|