I think for any mix, you should try and refrain from using any tracks that sound out of place. As long as it sounds in place I don't think it would be bad to play an older track mixed in with the new. It shows that you have the knowledge of what's out right now and what's been proven as a floor banger in the past.

i am always throwing in older tracks into my mixes, and it does work well, especially if its a recognisable track, then it gives the mix a bit more of an edge.

for instance this is the last cd i mixed

01 Mark Thornton - Now You See (Ross Assenheim Remix) [e-tcr] 2006
02 Johnny Arthur - Out Of It [Whoop!] 2005
03 Way Out West - UB Devoid [White Label] 2000
04 Alvin Dorsey & Nick Petrel - K [Black Hole] 2002
05 BT - Dreaming (Libra Mix) [Headspace]
06 Sunny Lax - P.U.M.A [Anjunabeats] 2006
07 Ian Betts & Oceanforce - Polarise (Factoria Mix) [Elevation] 2005
08 Sybren Danz - Dizzit [Well Wicked] 2002
09 Marc Marberg - Guarana [Euphonic] 2005
10 The Chemical Brothers - Electronic Battle Weapon 6 [White Label] 2003


i suppose 3 or so new tracks in there, the rest are older, but it still flows well, and so long as you programme them well, you cant really go wrong, and what harm is there in dropping a classic now and again

___________________
ID 1ID 2ID 3

Last edited by shades_of_gray on Jan-25-2006 at 00:48

quote:

Originally posted by shades_of_gray i am always throwing in older tracks into my mixes, and it does work well, especially if its a recognisable track, then it gives the mix a bit more of an edge.

yyeah me too, I always find that when i do a mix of totally upfront stuff it always sounds a bit flat and lacking something.

Just in this case theres a big drop in the overall sort of fullness of the track and it sounds almost amatureish compared compared to the other tracks. Ah i dunno how to explain it, i may post a sample so you can see what i mean.

Anyone still play Dance 2 Trance or Jam & Spoon?

quote:

Originally posted by djdk yyeah me too, I always find that when i do a mix of totally upfront stuff it always sounds a bit flat and lacking something. Just in this case theres a big drop in the overall sort of fullness of the track and it sounds almost amatureish compared compared to the other tracks. Ah i dunno how to explain it, i may post a sample so you can see what i mean.

I know what you mean. I like dropping old tracks in between newer tracks but a lot of the time they do sound thinner and less "refined". This is particularily noticeable in tracks that are made before 1999.

I don't think there's any other reason I wouldn't put old tracks on a demo - just avoid the cliche'd tracks (like For An Angel or Suburban Train etc.).

___________________
Latest releases:
Endless Cycles [Capital Heaven]
The Charlatan [Morphosis]

Edited to add a sample

Just listened to the sample, and I don't think it's specifically the track, more the transition. It seemed very abrupt and noticeable when you switched the basslines of the tracks, and then there was a big drop in energy when you faded out the Mark Sherry track as it was done pretty quickly.

I was one of the people who told Dave I thought it sounded out of place - as Dave says, not just because it's an older track or not a good record or anything, but because it sounds a lot worse produced than the rest of the tracks (due to how production has moved on in the last 8 or so years).

But having said that I'm inclined to agree with Mr Brown here... I've always said that a REALLY good DJ can make any track work in any set and, as Dave said to me on MSN earlier, you'd have a seriously hard time putting that track elsewhere in the mix. But on reflection I think it could work if mixed differently - about all I can think of suggesting is just a REALLY long (& late), smooth-as-you-possibly-can mix... which will make the transition from new (+ well produced) to old (+ weaker produced) much less noticable. You'd have to give it a shot, but I think it could well be possible to make it work.

___________________
Stu Cox |

having listened back to it youre right, it is a bit of a crap mix.

the cm track had only just finished d/l'ing when i started recording the mix so i didnt really have a chance to listen to it properly and just kinda threw it in. having fiddled for 5 minutes last nite i think ive found a way of getting into dream universe without it sounding pants.

I think the problem was that theres a sub-bass element to the Mark Sherry track that just simply isnt there in the CM track, meaning that when it drops out it sounds really abrupt and noticable

i love old tracks.... old school!!!any old tracks on labels like slinky, fragrant, platipus, are very hard to mix togther with tracks that are being produced these days. certain tracks just arn't meant to be put together, man with no name is one of those. you might wanna try using something more goa sounding to open up for a track by m.w.n.n. you'll find it, but definitely keep the man with no name track if possible

I am contemplating whether I should download some really old classics from 1999/2000 such as Kamaya Painter's "Far From Over", "Soft Light", and "Summerbreeze" with a few remixes of "Autumn Tactics" and "Saltwater" by Chicane (the biggest thing I am contemplating is MP3 vs. WAV..if i want to spend $10 more dollars for WAV files on BeatPort). I'de want to make a demo sometime and put some of these tracks in, considering they are some of my all time favorites. I think tracks from 98 on should be fine. There hasn't been as much trance lately that has the same magic as some of those tracks IMO.