One more from Counterpunch.org...



So Why Do Manly Men Love Him?

W is For Wimp

By BRIAN J. FOLEY

The things seem inextricably linked: an SUV, a man's arm cocked out the driver's window, Bush-Cheney 2004 bumper sticker. Message: President George W. Bush is the candidate of Manly Men. But why do Manly Men support him?

Is it because...Bush was a war hero? No, he avoided Vietnam by joining a National Guard squadron, certain never to leave the Home Front.

Is it because...Bush was a jock? Well, no. He barely played sports in school. Instead, he was a cheerleader.

Because...he dominated the business world? Again, no. Rich friends bailed him out of his oil ventures. Taxpayers bought the new stadium when he co-owned the Texas Rangers. As Byron York wrote in the conservative National Review Online, Bush's business career is "a complicated tale of family connections, hard work, and sweet deals, topped off by a taxpayer-subsidized baseball bonanza that may leave some Republicans feeling queasy about how their candidate got rich."

But hard work appears the least of it. According to York: "If one superimposes a timeline over the Bush career path, one sees that his rise in business coincided with his father's rise to the highest levels of government."

I can't find anything in Bush's past that should cause Manly Men to admire him. Could it be they admire his invading Iraq? But Iraq had no means to threaten us and could barely defend itself. Bush showed little mettle when an Iraqi official suggested that Bush and Saddam Hussein face off in a duel in lieu of war. Through a spokesman, Bush refused, treating the offer as if it were a joke. But if he believed it wasn't serious, why didn't he manfully accept the challenge, and watch Saddam chicken out?

W did, however, dress up like a fighter pilot and declare "Mission Accomplished" after Baghdad fell. It turns out that the whole photo-op was dress-up. It took place not in Iraq but safely near California. And more than 80 percent of the 1,000 US soldiers who have died in the war were killed since then.

It looks like it all comes down to talk: Bush talks tough. After 9-11, he grabbed a bullhorn (like a cheerleader) and declared from Ground Zero that he would bomb "the people who knocked down these buildings." He said he would "smoke out" the terrorists, and get Osama bin Laden, "dead or alive."

Bush's specific brand of talk, his admirers say, shows that he's "decisive." The Bush campaign seized upon this idea and has relentlessly attacked John Kerry -- a combat veteran who says he can win the Iraq war -- as indecisive, a wimp, a "flip-flopper." The worst thing about flip-flopping, apparently, is not that it might show dishonesty, but that it reveals weakness. The tactic seems to be working. The label has stuck to Kerry so much that you can buy "John Kerry flip flop sandals."

But a look at Bush's record reveals that HE'S a flip-flopper. Bush wanted Osama bin Laden "dead or alive." Six months later, Bush said, "I truly am not that concerned about him." Candidate Bush said gay marriage was an issue for states to decide. As president he pushes to amend our Constitution to outlaw gay marriage nationwide. Bush opposed creating the Independent 9-11 Commission. Then, under pressure, he supported it. First he promised that we'd win the war on terror. Then last month, he said that the war is "un-winnable" but the next day said it is not only winnable, but that we're winning it. None of these flip-flops, however, has punctured the myth that Bush is "decisive."

Apparently, the MYTH that W is manly matters more than REALITY. Perhaps Manly Men stand by him because they are so afraid of flip-flopping themselves? How else can we explain why Manly Men cheer for Bush while he wastes billions of their hard-earned dollars in an unnecessary war? Why Manly Men have cheered Bush as he burned a budget surplus into a projected $400 billion deficit? Why Manly Men salute Bush while he leaves our seaports and nuclear power plants vulnerable to terrorist attacks? Why Manly Men SUBMITTED when the Bush Administration took away their -- and their wives and children's -- constitutionally based freedoms?

Being a pom-pom boy for Bush is easy, especially when all the other boys are doing it. On the other hand, citizenship is hard work. Protecting our Constitution requires vigilance. Standing up for America takes guts, especially against cowardly bullies who gang up and claim our flag as their own, jail people based on mere suspicion, and denounce anyone who disagrees as a "traitor."

Do Manly Men have the guts to look past the rhetoric of their Cheerleader-in-Chief, and judge him on his actions?

BRIAN J. FOLEY is a professor at Florida Coastal School of Law. He can be reached at [email protected].

http://www.counterpunch.org/foley09182004.html

There will never be enough reasons to dislike Bush. At this point I have so many of them to choose from I don't need another one of these articles that seem to think I need to hear about another one.

Give me scandal. Give me someone's resignation. Anyone pro-Bush I don't care who. I'm so jaded. Three more years?! Say it ain't so lord, say it ain't so.

Well actually its more like 1,007 days.

Or 2 years, 9 months, 3 days excluding the end date

Thats
* 87,004,800 seconds
* 1,450,080 minutes
* 24,168 hours
* 143 weeks
http://www.timeanddate.com/date/dur...11&d2=4&y2=2008

quote:

Originally posted by josh4 Thats * 87,004,800 seconds http://www.timeanddate.com/date/dur...11&d2=4&y2=2008

I wonder if that includes leap seconds?

You guys are funny.

Unfortunately, I won't jump on the "I hate Bush" bandwagon, simply because there are two other branches of the government that fuck up this country.

Presidents can only be elected twice. But horrible senators like kennedy get elected every time. I am not pointing out kennedy because he is a democrat. I am pointing him out because he is just as corrupt as every other politician, otherwise he wouldn't be elected.

Actually, many of the men who are "manly" and "macho" are in fact losers insecure about their d*cks

There's a psychological basis for that - they try to compensate for their insecurities.

Ok the reason that "manly" man or whatever love bush is in fact a problem that has been around for hundreds of years. And something that I picked up on last semester in my history of european warfare and politics class. Basically as we all know every society is broken up into many parts.

You see that Trancer's article brings up all these "patriotic" and nationalistic words and keywoards, that in essence describe the feelings of "true red blooded Americans". That's because the working class will, virtually, always vote for the symbol of the greatness of a nation. These manly men are people who work hard physical jobs and represent strength, just as is found in their trucks/SUVs and their patriotism. They don't do this for financial gain but for greatness of the country and nation they live under. Happened in France, England, Germany, Italy, Russia, so on and so forth. This isn't a suprise. Especially since what makes America's economy and culture work is consumers and suppliers in the simpliest form, it comes out to be that tons of these people will vote for whoever presents them with the greatest image of their nation and what they stand for.

My greatest proof of this will have to be the commercial that aired 2 weeks prior to the Reagan/Carter election. Where Carter had a pretty damn big lead untill a series of commercials portraying Ronald and Nancy Reagan in cowboy clothing and in the saddle riding through the West into a sunset to some country or western music.

___________________
My SpaceMySpaceMUSIC
Anti-Purple Alliance.

I think that he may have fallen into one of the same traps that his father did, having too many unprepared advisors, listening to "the polls", or surrounding himself with "yes" men.

quote:

Originally posted by josh4 There will never be enough reasons to dislike Bush. At this point I have so many of them to choose from I don't need another one of these articles that seem to think I need to hear about another one. Give me scandal. Give me someone's resignation. Anyone pro-Bush I don't care who. I'm so jaded. Three more years?! Say it ain't so lord, say it ain't so. Well actually its more like 1,007 days. Or 2 years, 9 months, 3 days excluding the end date Thats * 87,004,800 seconds * 1,450,080 minutes * 24,168 hours * 143 weeks http://www.timeanddate.com/date/dur...11&d2=4&y2=2008

You got the time till Election Day right, but not time till eh actually leaves office. He leaves office on 20 January 2009 at noon, US EST.

Now till he leaves is this amount of time:

From and including: Friday, 3 February 2006, 13:18:26
To, but not including : Tuesday, 20 January 2009, 12:00:00

The duration is 1,081 days, 22 hours, 41 minutes and 34 seconds

Or 2 years, 11 months, 16 days, 22 hours, 41 minutes, 34 seconds

Note: This calculator does not take time zones, daylight saving time or leap seconds into account.
Alternative time units
1,081 days, 22 hours, 41 minutes and 34 seconds can be converted to one of these units:

* 93,480,094 seconds
* 1,558,001 minutes (rounded down)
* 25,966 hours (rounded down)
* 154 weeks (rounded down)




http://timeanddate.com/date/duratio...9&h2=12&i2=&s2=